Film Vs. Reality In Hollywood's Labels At Their Finest
Labels at Their Finest Have you ever thought about Hollywood’s tendency to repeat history, plots, and setups? Do movies accurately represent the true way of high school life? All too often, we are placed to believe the most popular, pretty, blonde girl is the one we want to be. She appears to have it all together. Her “slatternly tongue” “devastates other kids.” But, is she the only place the stereotype stops? However, there is always a catch between fantasy and reality. Does Denby present enough logical and emotional evidence to prove so? Let’s find out. Youth in today's time are given a false sense of verisimilitude when entering high school. Movies portray high school as either the best thing ever or a hell on Earth if you will.
…show more content…
He and all readers are utterly baffled by his findings on how everything cinematic truly escapes our reoccurring mindset. On the contemplation of films versus reality, David compares plot lines of movies such as “Disturbing Behavior”, “Ten Things I Hate About You”, and “Never Been Kissed”. From these three movies, he pulls out all of the overlapping pieces of cliche terms. In the solid representations of this “poisonous system of status, snobbery, and exclusion” many aspects come to light. The pretty girl always has the male sidekick who is the star quarterback or athlete. The structure of Denby's passage tends to not use any transition words at all. Although many of his paragraphs start with rhetorical questions or a minimally worded sentence to introduce his next point, the only transitional word introducing his next paragraph is "initially". To keep viewers on their toes, film writers may throw in an objective character who, in turn, These two have it all, power, looks, money, and sometimes even talent.
In a final attempt to make his point completely comprehensible, the way his text is structured mocks Hollywood’s proclivity to reiterate false authenticity. The article is probably three times the length it would be if another repetition was not involved. By representing this technique of movie makers everywhere, he creates an almost annoying effect, bringing the down right purpose home. Even though it is strong rhetorically, it leaves readers slightly bored and banal. It may sound bad but it then again proceeds to prove his point
He and all readers are utterly baffled by his findings on how everything cinematic truly escapes our reoccurring mindset. On the contemplation of films versus reality, David compares plot lines of movies such as “Disturbing Behavior”, “Ten Things I Hate About You”, and “Never Been Kissed”. From these three movies, he pulls out all of the overlapping pieces of cliche terms. In the solid representations of this “poisonous system of status, snobbery, and exclusion” many aspects come to light. The pretty girl always has the male sidekick who is the star quarterback or athlete. The structure of Denby's passage tends to not use any transition words at all. Although many of his paragraphs start with rhetorical questions or a minimally worded sentence to introduce his next point, the only transitional word introducing his next paragraph is "initially". To keep viewers on their toes, film writers may throw in an objective character who, in turn, These two have it all, power, looks, money, and sometimes even talent.
In a final attempt to make his point completely comprehensible, the way his text is structured mocks Hollywood’s proclivity to reiterate false authenticity. The article is probably three times the length it would be if another repetition was not involved. By representing this technique of movie makers everywhere, he creates an almost annoying effect, bringing the down right purpose home. Even though it is strong rhetorically, it leaves readers slightly bored and banal. It may sound bad but it then again proceeds to prove his point