Preview

Fielders Model

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
824 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fielders Model
Fiedler’s Contingency Theory
Fiedler’s Contingency Theory shows the relationship between the leader’s orientation or style and group performance under differing situational conditions. The theory is based on determining the orientation of the leader (relationship or task), the elements of the situation (leader-member relations, task structure, and leader position power), and the leader orientation that was found to be most effective as the situation changed from low to moderate to high control. Fiedler found that task oriented leaders were more effective in low and moderate control situations and relationship oriented managers were more effective in moderate control situations.
Increasing effectiveness of the leader

Relationship Oriented

Correlations between the leader’s orientation and the leader’s effectiveness Task Oriented

Increasing effectiveness of the leader Increasing favorableness to leader

Leader-member relations Task structure Leader position power Structured

Good Unstructured Structured

Poor Unstructured

Strong Weak Strong Weak Strong Weak Strong Weak

High control situation

Moderate control situation

Low control situation

Contingency Theory Definitions
Situational Elements
Leader-member relations: The regard with which the leader and the group members hold one another determines, in part, the ability of the leader to influence the group and the conditions under which he or she can do so. A leader who is accepted by the group members is in a more favorable situation than one who is not. Task structure: Factors that determine task structure are 1.) can a decision be demonstrated as correct, 2.) are the requirements of the task understood by everyone, 3.) is there more than one way to accomplish the task, and 4.) is there more than one correct solution. If the group’s task is unstructured, and if the leader is no more knowledgeable that the group about how to accomplish the task, the situation is unfavorable. Leader

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Leaders encompass principal styles that persuade his or her values and preferences. The Fiedler contingency model centers upon suitable blending amid the leadership conditions and his or her leadership style. Determining a leader’s situation is a necessity within this model. Within the realm of The Path-Goal theory, leaders can escalate subordinate satisfaction and performance through simplifying and clearing the road to goals and by escalating the quantity and types of available rewards concerning goal achievement. The Situational Leadership Theory contends that leadership actions should adapt to match the demands of specific situations as successful leaders must…

    • 1221 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Relationship-oriented leaders are primarily concerned with developing good relationships with their subordinates and being liked by them” (Jones), because of this close relationship the subordinates want to perform well. This method has already worked well for Robin but needs to be strengthened due to the fast expansion of the organization. The first situational characteristic that plays a role in the Fiedler’s contingency model for leadership is the leader-member relation, which refers to the feelings the members have towards the leader such as fondness and trust. The more positive the feelings the better the performance in the situation. The second situational characteristic is the task structure.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ldr 531 Week 1

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Trait Approach assumes that some people are natural leaders and examines motives, values, personality, and skills. The Behavior Approach branches into two sections. One method to the Behavior Approach is to look at leader behavior. What does the leader actually do? The other portion of the Behavior approach is to determine what actions are helpful and what actions are less helpful for leaders. The Power-Influence Approach looks at leadership from the perspective of power. This approach asks the questions like, “What type of power does the leader have in regards to the followers?” This approach looks at the amount and type of influence the leader has on the people around him or her. The situational approach looks at the situation leader must deal with. This approach examines the mission of the unit, the type of organization the leader is a part of, and the nature of the work environment. The Integrative Approach involves multiple types of approaches. Participative Approach involves both the behavior and the power-influence approach. Participate leadership involves the group in decision-making and creates a sense of project ownership by the group. Members who feel empowered are more committed to mission accomplishment. For these reasons, the Participative Approach is the desired…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hughes et al 2014 defined leadership behaviors as actions taken in response to situations. Behaviors were defined as a function of personality, knowledge, experience, traits, intelligence attitudes, values, and interests. Available literature suggests that while some traits are common across studies, the overall findings suggest that leaders in one situation may not necessarily be leaders in all situations. According to the contingency theory approach,…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fiedler’s contingency model actually focuses on the two most important things in leadership styles. 1. Why, in particular situations some leaders will become more effective than other leaders even though they have equal credentials, and 2. Why a particular leader may be effective in one situation but not in another. Like the trait approach, Fiedler’s theory acknowledged that personal characteristics influence the effectiveness of leaders and he was particularly interested in the styles of leadership, and how a person approaches being a leader. Basically Fiedler considers leadership styles to be relatively fixed or enduring. He stated that leaders cannot be “taught” to be relationship oriented or task oriented, nor can a leader alter his or her style according to the situation. Their managers must either change the situation to fit the leader or put the leader somewhere where they will be effective.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Evans, M. G. 1996. R. J. House’s “A Path Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness”. Leadership…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Leadership Style

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Fiedler’s research demonstrates, in essence, if you don’t fit the team mold, you are unfit to lead the team. The contingency model asserts that leadership styles can be gauged by the Least Preferred Coworker (LPC) scale. This model posits leadership styles on a spectrum ranging from task motivated, low LPC, or relationship motivated, high LPC. The contingency aspect ties the leadership styles to situational variables of the organization.…

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    evolved over the years in some organizations to a more participative style and yet there are still…

    • 10294 Words
    • 42 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    the group, and sorting tasks by level of interdependence—and of team leadership, such as emphasizing purpose, building…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A leader 's behavior is acceptable to subordinates when viewed as a source of satisfaction and motivational when need satisfaction is contingent on performance, and the leader facilitates, coaches and rewards effective performance. Path goal theory identifies achievement-oriented, directive, participative and supportive leadership styles.…

    • 2668 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Since it is unlikely for one individual to meet all of the group’s demands all the time, it becomes important for the role of the leader to be…

    • 3761 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The path-goal theory can best be thought of as a process in which leaders select…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stages of Forming a Group

    • 1443 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to Tuckman and Jensen (1977), there are five stages of group development. The five stages are “forming”, “storming”, “norming”, “performing”, and “adjourning”. Forming is when everyone is instructed to group together for a particular purpose and understand the task to be accomplished but there are sceptical between each other. This is the period of "testing-out" our group members. Storming is where some minor confrontations will arise that is quickly dealt with. These may relate to the work of the group itself or to responsibilities within the group. The conflict will be more or less suppressed, but it'll be there, under the surface and here is where leader is being chosen by everyone or subconsciously. Norming is they now understand each other better, can appreciate each other's skills. Individuals listen, support each other, and are prepared to change pre-conceived views. They feel they're part of a cohesive, effective group. Performing is the group can begin to get some work done on a relatively stable structure. Everyone knows each other well and can work together, trusts each other to allow independent activity. Adjourning is about completion and disengagement, both from the tasks and group members. Individuals will be proud of having achieved much and they reflect on what they've done, and consciously move on. (Knights & Willmott 2010, p91)…

    • 1443 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Developed by Paul Hersey and Kenneth H. Blanchard, situational leadership is a contingency model that focuses on the followers. The model suggests that successful leadership is accomplished by selecting the right leadership style, based on the level of followers readiness. Emphasis on the followers in leadership effectiveness reflects the reality that it is the followers who accept or reject the leader. Regardless of what the leader does, effectiveness depends on the actions of his or her followers. Fred Fiedler, developed the Leadership Contingency Model; and, I think that situational leadership uses the same two leadership dimensions that Fiedler identified: task and relationship behaviors. However, Hersey and Blanchard delved a step further by considering each as either high or low; and also, combining them into four specific leader behaviors: telling (high task-low relationship). The leader defines roles and tells people what, how, when, and where to do various tasks. It emphasizes directive behavior; selling (high task-high relationship). The leader provides both directive behavior and supportive behavior; participating (high relationship-low task). The leader and follower share in decision making, with the main role of the leader being facilitating and communicating; and also, delegating (low relationship-low task). The leader provides little direction or support.…

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week 3 Homework

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Researchers began to focus on what style of leadership was most effective in a particular situation with a particular manager. Contingency or situational theories look for the best fit between the leader and the situation and provide guidelines for a manger to achieve this fit. Managers adjust their decision making, orientation and motivational approach based upon a unique combination of factors in their situations for example characteristic of an employee, type of work and organization structure, personal preferences for the employee and the upper level management input.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays