Preview

Explain Why the Great Reform Act of 1832 Was Passed

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
318 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain Why the Great Reform Act of 1832 Was Passed
Explain why the great reform act of 1832 was passed
A major factor in the passing of the great reform act was the old electoral system, which was extremely unorganised and unfair. In cities like Manchester there was little representation but Old Sarum, a town with a population of just 15, could get two seats in parliament. Bribery in the electoral system was common due to there being no secret ballots; usually the person that was voted into parliament was the person that could provide the best bribes. Catholic Emancipation was a reason why the Reform Act was passed, also. George IV died in the June of 1830 which meant a general election would automatically follow. The Tories won the election but by a slender margin. The Tories were split over Catholic Emancipation, a number of the Ultras felt they had been forced to pass the Act in 1829 and were offended by this. The Whigs were content on getting into office and knew that if they pushed the issue of parliamentary reform, the Tories would split even further. The Duke of Wellington claimed that that the system in place at the time was as near perfect as anyone in Britain could have hoped for. There was protest against this and his resignation followed. William IV, the new king, called upon Earl Grey and his Whig party to form a government and having made a Reform bill a condition of acceptance, he agreed. The whigs were not the liberal reformers who believed in sharing political power more sparsely that many thought they were. It is more likely that they were desperate to regain office and saw parliamentary reform as the best way to acquire support. They recognised the danger of a French style revolution, however. The whigs were mostly aristocrats and realised that if they didn’t share some political power they were in danger of losing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The rejection of constitutionalism by Charles I’s sour relationship with the Parliament and Oliver Cromwell’s dissolving of Parliament, along with the acceptance of constitutionalism through the Glorious Revolution during the reign of William and Mary all resulted in a strong English power and newly reinforced parliamentary rights.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Between the years 1846 and 1868, the Conservative party was only in power for a total of just under four years – 1852, 1858-97 and 1866-68. Throughout these short-lived periods, they were never able to achieve a majority and this illustrates and defines the extent of Whig/Liberal dominance in this period. Their dominance was without doubt partially as a result of their free-trade agenda, but other factors, such as other policies the grouping made in this period, the gravitation of the Peelites towards the Whigs, the growth of popular Liberalism, the work of specific individuals and the weakness of the Conservatives also caused their dominance in this period.…

    • 2523 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Liberals claimed that the Lords were the selfish rich who weren’t willing to help the country, whereas the Conservatives tried to appeal to the wealthy stating that this would lead to social revolution and that is was the duty of the House of Lords to block controversial policy that the public hadn’t voted on. The Liberals won with a 2 seat majority and the support of the Irish Nationalists who were hoping to obtain Home Rule through the Liberal government which led to the tax being passed. This Liberal win led to the second constitutional crisis where the Liberals pushed a bill which sought to remove the power of the House of Lords to veto bills and replace it with a power of suspensory veto, to delay a bill for 2 years – yet remove their power entirely to alter ‘money bills’. The Lords rejected this again which led to Asquith going to King Edward VII asking him to create more Liberal peers which he agreed to but died before he could bring this reality. His son King George V preferred a more consensual agreement between the two parties and this led to the 1910 constitutional conference where the conservatives offered to reform Lords powers, yet the Liberals rejected this and the conference ended in November which led to the second 1910 general…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They also helped form the faction to lead the two party system. It was under the United States operates. Also , they came to represent their division of the shape early in the national polities. The men's were opposing their vision to the nation's path. Hamilton distrusted the popular will, but he believed the government should considerable the power in order to have a successful course. By the way , Jefferson was placing his trust of the people as governors.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the years progressed from 1815-1840 the voter participation was increasing drastically. As seen in document A, in 1824 there was a 26.9 percent of voter participation which tripled in a matter of 16 years. After the controversial “corrupt bargain” of 1824, voters were determined to have their voices heard in order to bring who they truly wanted into power. In addition to the rise of participation, the percentage of state allowing the common voters themselves to chose presidential electors climbed to almost 100%. Andrew Jackson assisted the increase of voters, he removed the requirements and opened up the voting pool to more common folk; this gave the common people more power equal to that of the aristocracy.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This question focuses on the importance of the Second Reform Act in Disraeli’s rise to the top of the Conservative Party and his emergence as the leader. In order to decide on the relative importance of the Send Reform Act, I will also consider other factors, which impacted on Disraeli’s emergence, including the 1846 split of the Conservative party and the death of George Bentinck, Derby’s ineffective leadership, Palmerston’s death in 1865 and Disraeli’s determination and political skill.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Whigs had split to the point that the party was declared dead by its leaders. In 1853 the Democrats controlled every Southern State and the Whigs elected only 14 of the 65 congressmen from those states.…

    • 3820 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the 1867 reform act was passed it gave the vote to every male householder living in a borough constituency, the working class men in the towns. Even though is increased the amount of individuals able to vote in Britain it was still very restricted as it was explained that the vote was only passed to men that owned a property over the value of £10 a year. This did double the amount of men able to vote although women still had no right to vote for their country. The 1884 reform act extended the vote to the working class people in the countryside; this managed to increase the electorate by 50%. However the undemocratic feature of this which still remained was that men who owned a property in a different constituency although they could also vote in…

    • 1328 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Gladstone was a leader of the Liberal Party in 1867 and became prime minister the following year. Gladstone's ideas involved simplifying the tax system and abolishing hundreds of duties. He was prime minister four times and spoke for human rights and against atrocities in the world. His opponent, Benjamin Disraeli served as Chancellor of the Exchequer and leader of the House of Commons. Disraeli’s goal was to make conservatism relevant again and create ideas of reform for the working class.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The title, “great” is reserved for a select few characters and documents in history. Alfred earned his through establishing stable change, peace and improvement. So too the Magna Carta, which brought about greater justice and freedom for the common man and limited royal influence. In the same ways, the reform act of 1832 warranted the title. It was by no means a revolutionary measure, nor “the final solution of a great constitutional question” as Russell had put it, but both symbolically and physically, it spelt change for Britain. This in itself showed its greatness – despite Pitt having attempted reform in the 1780s, and the issue having repeatedly returned to parliament, no reform had been achieved. The fact that finally after so much time and so much fight, a reform measure had been brought in, it did not so much matter what was contained in the act, or if it benefited anyone. The symbolic victory and relief that ‘reform had begun’ was enough for most people to perceive it as “great”. The symbolic victory would not have been enough for long though; for the reform act to be considered “great”, it would have to be a step towards a fairer, more democratic government. In addition to this, it would have been imperative for it not to worsen the common man’s situation. Some historians have argued that reform was brought in by the Whigs purely as a political move to secure more seats; if this was the primary motivation it would detract from the “greatness” of the act. In essence, the reform act was “great”. In the short term, it avoided bloody revolution, strengthened and stabilised the current social and political situation and granted a fairer and more democratic system. In the long term, it did open Peel’s feared “door” of reform that the Tories were unable to close (reform continued and advanced), but it did so in a measured, safe and gradual way so as to preserve tradition, maintain peace, and ensure the continued development of a secure, fair and benevolent…

    • 2586 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The statement “Although historically represented as distinct parties, the Federalists and the Whigs in fact shared a common political ideology, represented many of the same interest groups, and proposed similar programs and policies” is partially true. Both the Federalists and the Whigs shared common political ideas of the same interests groups, and proposed similar programs and policies- such as Clay’s American system and Hamilton’s economic plan. Both parties also believed in the National Bank because they thought it was necessary and proper. But, both parties had many differences as well. These differences consisted of representation, leadership and origination.…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This leniency started with the drafting of the Carter of Liberties. Foner states “the charter required that elections be held every three years among male property owners and the freemen of New York City; it also reaffirmed traditional English rights” (Foner, p. 93). The English liberties that were establish allowed more individuals to vote, and gave some power back to the lower class colonist. Forer states “it is estimated that between 50 and 80 precent of adult white men could vote in eighteenth century America” (Foner, p. 150). More of the lower class having the availability to vote make the statement that the upper class had more power in government less persuasive. This is because the lower class had more power of choosing who would control the power of their respective…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Poor Law of 1834 (New Poor Law), The Poor Law Commissioners of England and Wales, and The Purpose of the 1834 Poor Law. These liberal reforms were put in place to help the people and the government to create a better place for everyone.…

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This soon changed based on the teachings of Adam Smith who wanted to lift the working conditions as well as spread wealth among more people. From the ideas of Smith, Classical Liberalism formed which valued individual’s freedom with a limited government. People were wanting limited government because they wanted a say in policies and issues that would effect their lives. The next government reform was the Jacksonian Democracy which opened voting to all white men, which at the time was the highest number of people eligible to vote then anywhere else. Utilitarianism made it so it maximized benefits for all people including the minority. This reform focused on what made the best sense for everyone and not just one type of person. The last reform was Chartism which focused on political rights for the working class. Chartism brought up many issues with the industry life and working class people. People wanted laws to help with the issues like unsafe working conditions, over crowding, and child…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many authors write books about events, their lives and their environment, and their corrupt government. One satirical author who wrote a novel about living in a corrupt society is Jonathan Swift who wrote Gulliver's Travels. The places the protagonist had visited reflected on the author's English government. The life of the author will be shown similar to this book because of the way he lived.…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays