Preview

What Are The Similarities Between The Federalists And The Whigs

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1298 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are The Similarities Between The Federalists And The Whigs
The statement “Although historically represented as distinct parties, the Federalists and the Whigs in fact shared a common political ideology, represented many of the same interest groups, and proposed similar programs and policies” is partially true. Both the Federalists and the Whigs shared common political ideas of the same interests groups, and proposed similar programs and policies- such as Clay’s American system and Hamilton’s economic plan. Both parties also believed in the National Bank because they thought it was necessary and proper. But, both parties had many differences as well. These differences consisted of representation, leadership and origination. The new supporters of the constitution became known as the Federalists. The Federalist Party was established originally to support the creation of a strong national government, after the …show more content…
The Whigs favored more governmental involvement in commerce and favored the National Bank (like the Federalists) and industrial growth. They opposed rapid, uncontrollable settlement in the west. Southern and Northern businessmen supported the Whigs (they favored the wealth). The Whig party was led by former National-Republicans Daniel Webster and Henry Clay. The platform of the Whigs bared remarkable similarities to that of the old Federalist Party. The Whigs supported a more active national government that would check the "excesses of unrestricted individualism." The Whigs were also very supportive of the National Bank. They agreed with Hamilton in saying that it was "necessary and proper" in running the government and the economy smoothly. Henry Clay’s American System was similar to Hamilton’s economic system. The goal was to make America economically independent by increasing industrial production in the United States and by the Creation of the Second National Bank (bank, tariff, and internal

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In 1787 when the Constitution was created it caused many people to start a grand debate. Of course, there were people that supported the constitution and people that were afraid of the constitution. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists created documents that are within the Constitution that have shaped United States political parties. The Federalists supported a strong central government because the Articles of Confederation didn’t have strong national power, and was very restrictive.A reason why The Federalist wanted to change the constitution was to add people’s opinion into the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists supported a strong state government because they believed that a strong national government would cause a monarch and they were afraid of who will have the power.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the 1700’s, the first political parties formed over disagreements in the government. The two parties were the federalists and Antifederalists. Federalists made up the people who felt that the stronger government was better for the country and supported the Constitution. The federalists had felt as if different “fiscal and monetary policies” were a weakness for the national economy. Also, the federalists supported banking("Anti-Federalist vs Federalist"). Federalists wanted to fight for stronger governments, managing the country’s debt and ratification. Antifederalists were people who opposed the Constitution of 1788 and disagreed with a stronger federal government. The Antifederalists wanted to keep the power to be for states and local…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two-party system was formed by the end of Jackson’s presidency. [1] Although both parties, Jacksonian Democrats and Whigs, grew out of the same roots of the Jeffersonian republicanism, each bore different political philosophy and policy. For example, the Whigs welcomed the involvement of government and favored protective tariffs. They believed in internal improvements, schools and black colonization with the federal finance. They also advocated the regulation of currency and credit based on the similar idea of the Bank of the United States. Furthermore, the party supported moral, intellectual, economic advance, and the state school systems as well as a soft approach to the Indian removal. The Whigs emphasized principles of system and disciplines…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    America’s first two political parties began with Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. This established the three branches treasury, state, and war. Hamilton had the role of secretary of treasury which he was with the federalist while Jefferson had the role of relations with foreign countries and he was with Republicans. Jefferson believed that America would be more successful if it had agricultural traditions while on the other hand Hamilton beliefs were more economically planned through facilities. Hamilton’s ideas and the Federalists were having a stronger central government acting in interest of commerce and manufactured (like Britain).…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thesis: The political and economic views of Hamiltonian Federalists and Jeffersonian Republicans differed in terms of centralized or state governments, acts passed by congress, American liberty, and industries. Later on when the Republican party dominated the government after the War of 1812, their original ideals started to blend in with Federalists’ and the lines blurred.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Jefferson and Madison felt that the national bank was unconstitutional, they fully supported it. Jefferson felt that supporting the national bank would avoid a political war between parties. He also believed that destroying all of the Federalists ideas would upset them and cause the country to divide into the political parties. Madison carried over Jefferson's beliefs to keep peace and continue what Jefferson began, although the bank was considered unconstitutional. Madison and Jefferson were both viewed by the Federalists as hypocrites because of their fickle loose or tight construction beliefs of the constitution. Although Jefferson and Madison both went against their political parties, they were doing it to benefit the country as a…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    hamilton v jefferson

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When the Constitution was ratified, conflict began between Hamilton and Jefferson. Hamilton’s followers, the Federalist, were in favor of the new Constitution because it had a balance of power and created a central government. He believed running the country on a loose interpretation of the Constitution. In other words, whatever was not forbidden in the Constitution should be allowed in which he supported the national bank. He was more focused on expanding the economic growth of the countries to bring success and establish a strong federal government to create a great deal of tariffs on the people, which would help pay off the national debt the country was in because of war. Hamilton thought the future would prosper more if the commercial and industrial society grew. He promoted the growth of factories…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Whig Party was similar to the Federalist Party in terms of favoring a powerful central government. They supported the national bank and paper currency. This Party believed in moral and social reform which included the development of schools and abolishing alcohol consumption. The…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The federalists were mostly developed by high-class wealthy merchants, bankers, manufactures or professional men from New England and the Atlantic Seaboard, along with farmers and Southern planters. They admired the English aristocracy. Federalists considered the common people ignorant and incapable of self-government. They desired high voting qualifications claiming that unfettered democracy was anarchy. They favored a broad interpretation of the constitution to strengthen the central government at the expense of the state’s rights and wanted an expanding bureaucracy.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalists’ envisioned a strong national government due to the fact that they thought humans were selfish. Alexander Hamilton, the leader of the Federalists, believed that a powerful, central government that use the rights protected in the Constitution would strengthen the state's. Moreover, Hamilton would rather have power in the capital than giving the states rights. “Real liberty is neither found in despotism or the extremes of democracy, but in moderate governments,” Hamilton remarked. In order to get the strong nation and government, he desired, Hamilton made a national bank to pay off taxes, print money, and to make loans. He also wanted to expand the economy to benefit business and trade.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The democrats and Whigs of the 18th century had more similarities than they had with the Jeffersonian Republicans and Federalists from which they declared to be originated from. American government in the new regime was different from their forerunners.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    After the American Revolutionary war, the budding country was deeply in debt. People had different ideas on how to pay off this debt, later leading to the formation of political parties. The Federalist Party was formed and they believed that it was in the new country’s best interest to have a strong centralized…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Anti Federalists

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The antifederalists were a coalition made up of people from many different backgrounds who opposed ratification of the Constitution. Their organization was not as good as the Federalists; however, they had a profound group of leaders who were exceptional in state politics. Anti-Federalists were an important existence in most states. In several states, supporters of the Constitution agreed to provide support from mild anti-Federalists with recommendations to secure amendments. During ratification the expectation was that the Constitution would be changed to address some of the opponents' concerns. The anti-Federalists worked within the Constitution's bounds after the ratification and they expected Federalists to do the same. Their ratification…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first political party system includes the Federalists v. Democratic Republicans. The Federalists, led by John Adams and Alexander Hamilton, believed in a strong national government. They wanted to create a Constitution. They argued that government power should be used to promote economic development through a national bank. Democratic-Republicans, were led by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. They supported a weaker national government. They feared that federal involvement in the economy would benefit only a few wealthy northeasterners, and they thought that agriculture should still be the country's economic source. The second party system which included the Democrats v. Whigs differs from the first political party. Whigs, led by…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the early years of our nation, there was not a great deal of brotherly love, peace and agreement that could be found in the government. Two political parties had evolved that possessed interests that spanned both ends of every argument and political idea. The Federalists believed that the nation should have a very centralized government and stood firm that this would bring about the most order and prosperity. To the contrary, Republicans wanted the rights to stay with the people and States and therefore felt that the federal government should have little control to protect the rights of the people. Many historical documents record the struggles between the two parties. The main struggles revolved around three areas. The first area…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays