Wildlife as a public trust resource. This means that the government holds wildlife in a trust for the people. No one person has more claim on wildlife than any other person but all citizens have the same right to use the same wildlife.
2. Elimination of markets for game. Commerce of wildlife was a large contributor for the decline in the 19th century. Professional hunters would kill many animals to sell at market. This tenet prohibits the sale of wildlife to keep populations sustainable.
3. Allocation of Wildlife by Law. This tenet ensures that wildlife is available to everyone and not privatized to companies or people of wealth. No laws should be written without due process of a democracy.
4. Wildlife should only be killed for legitimate reasons. This tenet ensures that wildlife is not killed for trivial reasons. Food, fur, property protection and self-defense are all legitimate reasons.
5. Wildlife is considered an international resource. Migratory birds and fishes move between countries in different seasons. This requires that the two countries work together in order to preserve and manage a migratory species.
6. Science as the basis for wildlife management. This means that science, not emotion or opinion, will be the foundation on which we make our laws and regulation to manage our wildlife …show more content…
The common person did not have the right to hunt or pursue wildlife. Theodore Roosevelt thought that this was a poor policy for America. He position was that equal hunting opportunity for all people, rich or poor, would be beneficial to society. Roosevelt called this idea Democracy of Sport.
“We do not intend that our natural resources shall be exploited by the few against the interests of the many... Our aim is to preserve our natural resource for the public as a whole, for the average man and the average woman who make up the body of the American people.” – Theodore Roosevelt
As can be seen in this quote, Roosevelt intended to appeal to the interest of the masses and the quality of our nation’s natural resources instead of the interests of the elite. This was a revolutionary idea that, on the surface, looked wonderful. Although this was a spectacular idea in theory, it has a few unintended