Preview

Eminent Domain Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
686 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Eminent Domain Essay
Eminent domain, also referred to as condemnation, or expropriation is the government’s ability to seize private property for “public use” while paying the landowner a fair price. As innocent or necessary as the concept may have been in its beginning, today it is a power play that is being abused, and has potential to negatively affect the environment. The original intent of eminent domain was for the betterment of society as a whole. Over time political officials have used the courts to corrupt this law from the benefit of society, to the betterment of a few. Needless to say there needs to be changes made to this law to protect the environment and landowners from the exploitation of this law. The original intent of eminent domain was a powerful way for the government to …show more content…
The Supreme Court’s ruling did not favor the land owners as the Boston Globe (2) states “The court’s 5-4 holding in Kelo v. City of New London gave local officials a green light to seize and demolish private homes through eminent domain, then turn the land over to developers itching to build something more lucrative.” It is a slippery slope when you remove the land owner’s ability to maintain private property just because it has the potential to gain economic profit. More recent is the Dakota access pipeline, an oil pipeline that calls into question the “public use”. As motherjones states (3) “The pipeline will cross through sacred lands and pass under the Missouri River twice. For the Standing Rock Sioux, the Missouri provides drinking water and irrigation, while its riverbanks grow innumerable plants of cultural important, including sage and buffalo berries.” Now more than ever the potential abuse of eminent domain brings up important questions about the sustainability of the environment and what people are willing to risk for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In this case, the City of Monroe, North Carolina decided in April of 2002, to supply the citizens of Monroe and surrounding area with natural gas through a direct connection between its natural gas distribution system and the Transcontinental Pipeline. The Transcontinental Pipeline transports and distributes natural gas from the Gulf of Mexico up through the northeastern United States. The parties of this case requested the court to focus on the validity of a local government’s exercise use of its power of eminent domain. According to our textbook, Business Law Text and Cases, eminent domain is sometimes referred to as the condemnation power of government to take land for public use. The town of Monroe, North Carolina entered into an agreement with the town of Midland to facilitate the acquisition of land for the construction of the new pipeline by acquiring the rights of way to local land required for the installation of the pipeline. Per the agreement, Midland had the option to tap the pipeline at discounted rate. Midland then exercised its eminent domain authority to condemn the need…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case was the taking clause in the fifth amendment which enshrines your right to private property without undue government interference traditionally takings on the public use is included highways , schools and other owned government private projects but in 2005 supreme court turned that notion in to its ear .…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This week for PLN I read Dakota Access Pipeline: What's at stake? by Holly Yang. Why this topic is blowing up is because where Native American tribes live the government approved a pipeline to be built and where the pipeline is going to be constructed invades the native American's land. Some background of the Dakota Pipeline is it is a 1,172-mile pipeline would stretch from the oil-rich Bakken Formation to the southeast into South Dakota, Iowa, and Illinois. The Army Corps of Engineers approved the project then Standing Rock Sioux tribe sued the Corps because it would threaten the tribe environmentally and economically. Some people are arguing that they need the pipeline because it will be an economic boom but on the other hand, people are…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One recent autumn evening while I stood in line to comment at a public hearing about a proposed natural gas pipeline through Virginia, I befriended an inspirational environmental advocate by the name of Bear Redstar. Bear grew up in a Lakota family as a part of the Dakotas’ seven Sioux tribes. Bear’s initial exposure to the destructive potential of a pipeline occurred while he worked as a welder for ExxonMobil on the Trans-Alaska Pipeline, where he witnessed the steel pipe rupture and release crude oil into the environment. Upon his return home, he advocated alongside Native American community members against the Dakota Access Pipeline. A few months ago Mr. Redstar, moved to Roanoke, Virginia, again facing the trouble of a pipeline. He and I were at the public hearing to warn the Appalachian community of the risks associated with a pipeline.…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States government possesses a long history of double-crossing Native Americans. The most recent event is the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline currently being protested by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and their supporters. Though the pipeline is more than halfway completed, protestor's have held their ground since April of 2016, and show no sign of losing momentum. The tribe argues construction of the pipeline has already bulldozed into the sacred burial grounds of their ancestors, and further digging will result in irreparable damage to historical, religious and cultural sites. Along with the possible contamination of the Missouri River in case of a leak or oil spill. Followed by The Army Corp of Engineers, responsible of approving the final permits for the pipeline, failing to properly consult with the tribe beforehand. The pipeline has been momentarily halted, while…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the landowner has the right to make sure that his land is safe from natural and manmade hazards on his land. History has found that as safe as…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There should never have been a problem with the Dakota Access Pipeline, and it should be built. The pipeline has many benefits, and few, if any, actual problems. Nodaplsolidarity.org, a site dedicated to opposing and protesting the pipeline, avoids the issue of what the problems with it actually are, saying that the pipeline is a violation of the United Nation’s Declaration of Universal Human Rights, and a violation of the United Nation’s Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, without actually naming what it is about the pipeline that violates these declarations. Since there appear to be no actual issues violated (and they are declarations of the United Nations, not the United States) these problems can be dismissed, leaving us with…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government should not come in contact with property that does not belong to them unless consent is given by the owner. In the case of Standing Rock, the government was never given permission to construct the oil pipeline in their Indian Reservation territory. The government should not be allowed to construct the pipeline in Indian Reservation territory because first of all that property is not theirs is the Sioux’s Tribe property. Second of all, the oil pipeline is going to produce many complications for the environment and the community around it. Third and final of all this is going to give America a bad image.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What would you do if the government denied your rights, threatened to harm your land, and threatened your primary source of water? Would you let them get away with it, or would you fight for what is right? The Dakota Access Pipeline is said to be “the safest and most environmentally sensitive way to transport crude oil from domestic wells to American consumers” (Dakota Access Pipeline Facts). It’s a pipeline that was built under Lake Oahe, which is located upstream of the Sioux tribes’ land. It would also would save a lot of money and energy to transfer oil across the nation. The Dakota Access Pipeline should have been stopped because the Sioux tribes have rights, the pipeline could damage the environment, and the government needs to care…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Gas Man Cometh

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The documentary, “Gas Land”, by Josh Fox, is a film about the problems with contaminated groundwater due to excessive and unregulated natural gas extraction across the country. In the film, Fox travels all over to talk to many people who have rented out their land to natural gas companies, only to get contaminated water and no help from any company or organization with the problems that ensue. Fox uses many techniques in his film to get across his point that America should not be subjected into a wasteland because of poor industry ethics and unregulated polluting of our water sources. By building his appeals, especially to ethos, as well as arranging many elements of the film, Fox creates a very staunch argument.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law Notes

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. One rule that emerges from the social contract is that people should never make unsupported judgments about one another but should instead always investigate the facts in an effort to uncover the truth about the character of a person or the nature of a situation.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    People hung, women treated as criminals, children branded for their religion, hundreds of people dying because of the government. A government where religion was the law and if you did not conform with what the Puritans believed, your life was in danger.(Solid hook!) However, things could be different with one phrase: the Establishment Clause.(Nice transition!) The lives of people in the Puritan society would have been different if the Establishment Clause had been enforced at the time because there would be a separation between church and state, Quakers would have been able to practice their religion and they would have lived peacefully.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On 1st Amendment

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages

    I am writing about the 1st amendment in this project.I am in the view of a lawmaker so I have to chose the best one for my prospective as of a law maker.And I thought the 1st amendment was the best. Also my team chose to Canada as our country where we are making are laws, but we only got to chose 5 amendments.We pick the 1st of course, the 3rd ,the 4th ,the 5th ,and the 8th.We have one teacher two lawmakers and 2 citizens in our group.To learn more keep on reading.…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When it comes to determining water rights there are two forms of defining them. On the eastern side of the United States they use a system called riparian rights. This system came down from English law, which states that all who own land along a water source have the right to use it. This system is great for areas with a large amount of rainfall. In the western states with low annual rainfall this method becomes a problem for those down stream. As a result water rights are controlled by the state government. Their system is called, “Prior appropriation which can be best summed up in the phrase "first in time, first in right."1 Along with this issue there are other groups who have claims to the water rights. They include that states, the federal government, and the American Indians. Because of this competition for water conflicts, repercussions and even law suits arise.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout Australia’s history, Aboriginals have been treated with disdain and disrespect. Early Australian legislative principles have allowed Indigenous Australians rights to be minimal. However, throughout the past century acts have been passed which have allowed the rights of Aboriginal Australians to become equal with their counterpart. It is this hypothesis that will be investigated. Key events and people throughout the history of Australia have developed their land rights. These events have formed various different legal principles and acts which have further shaped the course of Aboriginal land rights. One such principle that has been vital in early land rights is the term, Terra Nullius. Terms such as these have been abolished. Subsequently,…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays