Preview

Attractive Nuisance Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1354 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Attractive Nuisance Case Study
Our clients, the parents of their deceased son Opie Taylor, who was the age of ten years old. Every year the local Cub Scout troop, that Opie Taylor was apart off, would spend Thanksgiving at Floyd Lawson home that included fifteen acres of surrounding land. There is a ditch surrounding the premises which at the time of incident was filled with water that was from the continuous rain of that day. Opie Taylor on this day had slid down the embankment on a flattened cardboard into the water and never resurface. He was later found deceased from drowning in the ditch.
QUESTION PRESENTED Can a landowner be held liable under the "attractive nuisance" doctrine for an accidental death that occurs on the premises?
BRIEF ANSWER No, the child or any of the children that were present was not trespassing and the child was of age to understand danger. The landowner did have a duty to care for invited minors and to refrain from willfully and wantonly injuring him which he obliged. The embankment was in plain view and not hidden from invitee.
DISCUSSION
While the landowner has the right to make sure that his land is safe from natural and manmade hazards on his land. History has found that as safe as
…show more content…
In the case of Goodwin v. Jackson, 484 So. 2d 1041, 1046 (Miss. 1986), though this was an infant who had died, in a trailer park swimming pool, there was a fence around it to keep unwanted visitors from entering but at the time the gate door was open. The infant who died wondered out of her home and towards the swimming pool. In this case the infant died from drowning and no one was watching him. Though the parents sued in court; the court ruled in favor of the defendant, because even with the safety precautions accidents can still

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    shaw and baerry

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages

    •Finally, the world today is full of news about fracking, the process by which a high volume of liquid is pumped into the ground to fracture rock and extract natural gas. What are the ethical considerations of either permitting or prohibiting property owners from using their property in this manner?…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In a wrongful death suit for Stephan Andres the trial court did not err by rejecting the plaintiffs offered jury instructions for not providing a supervisor in the locker room required by Cal. Code Regs., tit. 22, § 65521, subd. (a), requiring that every pool be under the care of a competent person, which is not related to a lifeguard but the person in charge of the sanitation and hygiene of the pool. Negligence in itself only pertains if the person suffering the death or injury was one of the relatives for which the protection statute, ordinance, or regulation was adopted. Stephen, a victim of drowning rather than unsanitary facilities, was not related to the person whose protection section 65521 was…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Dustin Soldano v. Howard O’Daniels case models the common dispute between negligence and a party’s responsibility in an event. Likewise, chapter 1 of the Legal Environment textbook features Kuehn v. Pub Zone, a case that demonstrates a different scenario but the same battle of negligence and liability. The commonalities between the two cases support one another in the demonstration of the judges’ decisions as well as contribute to later common law.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Study Eminent Domain

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages

    He then noticed that on his front door a letter was posted communicating that the city authorities will be taking his property by eminent domain to create new businesses and jobs in the community. Not unlike the mountain property Martin is now facing another dilemma in which he is uninformed and reacting to an active developing issue. Therefore, I proceeded to explain that eminent domain or taking clause is a constitutional right granted by the Fifth Amendment that “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation” (Miceli,2015). Similarly, to Martin’s situation, I shared the Kelo v. New London case which was one of the most controversial cases concerning eminent domain, that precipitated protest across the U.S. Likewise, the facts from the Kelo’s case corresponds with Martin’s issue with the government seizing private property to sell to private developers, hence is where Kelo felt that New London was overstepping and violating the Fifth Amendment by selling the private property to a private developer instead of using it for public use (Kubasek et al.,2016). However, the decision ruled in favor of New London for the reason that, the city seizes the property to…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    dynamic business law

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Javier Galindo, the husband of the plaintiff, was sitting in his car in the driveway of Mr. Clark's property waiting to pick up his wife, who worked as a housekeeper for Mr. Clark, when a leaning 80 ft tree on an adjacent property fell on the plaintiff's husband's car and killed him. Ms. Galindo sued Mr. Clark for failing to notify her husband of the danger posed by the leaning tree.…

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This is the story that I have witnessed in my community. The dispute between the boundaries of houses led to the misunderstanding of each other. Since I do not own any rights to appear theirs real name in this paper, let’s assume they are James and Taylor. James and Taylor were longtime neighbors and best friends before the dispute happened. One day, Taylor had done some changes in her front gate, which included laying a concrete slab. This concrete slab intruded on James’ property line. Taylor and James had many strong emotions about what was the best way to resolve this property line dispute. For Taylor it was only a few cm. But for James it was a very important few cm. James, concerned about maintaining his current property rights, insisted that Taylor to remove the concrete. Taylor felt that in the spirit of being good neighbors the cm should be overlooked. On the top of the issue, there was a third party, “the property line agency” that was called by Taylor to mediate this issue. James felt betrayed that Taylor had called the property line agency on him a few months earlier. Taylor had called property line agency to get help with the property line issue. Shockingly, while investigating the property line, the agent noticed that James had constructed a concrete grave of his father 5cm in the backyard of Taylor’s property land. James was forced to move his father grave from Taylor’s land. James blamed Taylor. Taylor hadn’t meant for that to happen. Then she understood James’ anger towards her. In the end, James and Taylor made several apologies to one another and let go these past transgressions. Concrete slab of Taylor was still constructed and James’ father grave was also not removed. As a result of the mediation, James and Taylor were spared the expense of the property line agency and more importantly, returned to being good…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government should not come in contact with property that does not belong to them unless consent is given by the owner. In the case of Standing Rock, the government was never given permission to construct the oil pipeline in their Indian Reservation territory. The government should not be allowed to construct the pipeline in Indian Reservation territory because first of all that property is not theirs is the Sioux’s Tribe property. Second of all, the oil pipeline is going to produce many complications for the environment and the community around it. Third and final of all this is going to give America a bad image.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    5. As the property owner, the Defendant was in control of the property and had a duty to remediate the conditions and make sure the warning signs of the pool were listed and the dangers of no life guard on duty but failed to do so prior to the Plaintiff’s Injury.…

    • 1746 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alabama recognizes two theories of strict liability, which are ultra-hazardous or abnormally dangerous activities, and unreasonably dangerous products. Ultra-hazardous itself and the risk of harm it creates to those in the vicinity. The basis for liability is that one who for his own purposes creates an abnormal risk of harm to his neighbors must be responsible for relieving that harm when in fact it does occur. Unreasonably dangerous products are unreasonable when it is foreseeable, and the manufacturer’s ability or unreasonable danger is the measure of its duty in the design of its product. A manufacture’s failure to achieve its full potential in the design unreasonable danger forms the basis for it strict liability in tort. In the following case Dickinson v. City of Huntsville, 822 So. 2d 411, 417 (Ala. 2001) is an example of the ultra-hazardous strict liability.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Should the Pittston Coal Company be held liable for the emotional damages and psychic impairments of the plaintiffs?…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wk2DrillGripp

    • 821 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The stakeholder’s moral failings come only thinking of the revenue that mining would bring and not the effect on the environment. The beauty of the Green Valley will change with industrial growth. The involvement of politics may play a role since the land is public and owned by the government. Bureau of land Management is in charge of issuing permits for drilling, and some people think that they are catering to particular political groups.…

    • 821 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abbey goes on to name several large businesses and universities and charges them with “looting” these public lands, and compares their behavior to that of “gangsters.” His tone in this essay is harsh and accusatory, continuing to name several politicians who in his words would, “sell the graves of their mothers if there’s a quick buck in the deal.” Attacking the integrity of these men based on this opinion alone, and not directly addressing their stance on preserving our ecosystem, is an example of ad hominem, yet another logical fallacy that discredits his arguments. His claim that any person who goes into a field and begins drilling is committing a crime against the human race is barbaric. Human kind has evolved, and our tools and equipment have evolved as well, but the fact that some people make their living by using what is naturally available through plants and animals and even…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Summary: Fracking Democracy

    • 8942 Words
    • 36 Pages

    zoning laws to forbid drilling. Under the law in 2010, communities had the right to influence development. The challenge…

    • 8942 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If no harm or injury results from an allegedly negligent act, there is no tort.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "Does not the land have any rights?" they cry. "What about the plants and animals, birds and fish? What gives us the right to mine and burn and kill without care for nature?"…

    • 1819 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays