Dakota Pipeline Case Study

This week for PLN I read Dakota Access Pipeline: What's at stake? by Holly Yang. Why this topic is blowing up is because where Native American tribes live the government approved a pipeline to be built and where the pipeline is going to be constructed invades the native American's land. Some background of the Dakota Pipeline is it is a 1,172-mile pipeline would stretch from the oil-rich Bakken Formation to the southeast into South Dakota, Iowa, and Illinois. The Army Corps of Engineers approved the project then Standing Rock Sioux tribe sued the Corps because it would threaten the tribe environmentally and economically. Some people are arguing that they need the pipeline because it will be an economic boom but on the other hand, people are
Also, people are disputing about the environmental aspect. Energy Transfer Partners estimates that the pipeline could bring an estimated $156 million in sales and income taxes to state and local governments. The protests have been going on for months.

When I read Dakota Access Pipeline: What's at stake? by Holly Yang the topic was bothersome. For some people reading and they are part Native-American, they would be mad that the government approved this project. The people who have lived there all their lives on the land that the government granted and now the government is going to invade their own land to build a pipeline to carry oil to benefit their economy. The Native-American's have a right to say what happened on their land. The Standing Rock Sioux tribe sued the Corps because it would threaten the tribe environmentally and economically