This case study reviews the effectiveness of self manage teams in Levi Strauss & Co. The self manage teams were not performing and was facing problems such as low morale, high overhead cost and decrease in efficiency. The problems were analysed to determine the causes. The causes were insufficient training; poor management commitment; unclear objectives; poor strategy and implementation plan.
Solutions were then brainstormed for the above causes, which are; -
Establish a comprehensive training program which is a critical component for successful self manage teams. The whole training cycle, encompassing the training needs analysis, the training program and training effectiveness, must be carried out. -
Establish specific, measurable, achievable, realistic and timely objectives to ensure alignment through out the organization. -
Develop proper and clear guidelines and best practices to govern the teams as they need to know the boundaries of their decision making. The guidelines must incorporate reward system reinforcing the nature of self managed teams.
The above solution will help the team morale and empower the teams to perform effectively to achieve the team and organization objectives.
Statement of Problem
Implementation of self managing teams (SMT) which resulted in the following problems; -
Deterioration of employee morale.
Increase in labour and overhead cost by 25% during the first year of implementation. -
Decrease in efficiency (quantity of pants produced per hour worked) by 23%. -
Decrease in market share of men’s denim jeans in United States from 48% in 1990 to 26% in 1997.
Analysis of the cause of the problem
Levi Strauss & Co. implemented its SMT in 1992 with the intent of lower cost and increase productivity in order to remain competitive and keep their North America plants open.
Upon implementation SMTs, various problems affecting employee morale surfaced. The problems ranged from absenteeism to infighting among team members. Some brief seminars and training on team building and problem solving was given to the employees.
The question here, is the training given to the employees sufficient?
SMTs advocate team work and job rotation and therefore workers must understand team roles and also be multi skilled. It seems that Levi Strauss & Co only touched the surface in terms of training. Wellins (1992) suggested that organization underestimate the types of trainings required for team based work culture. He states that at least 20% of the time of a team member is spent on training during the first year of team activities in successful organizations. It is important that understanding each others roles as helps build trust among them. This is further supported by Belbin (1993) who stress that without understanding of team role theory, teams cannot be successfully established. It was evident that the teams did not understand the stages of group development. They were fine during the forming stage and problems started rising during the storming stage, where there were lots of mistrust between the team members to extent of threatening to kill. The team members clearly did not understand their roles and expectation. There was virtually no or poor leadership during this group develop stage as the teams had limited supervision. The teams did eventually move into the norming and performing stage despite limited intervention from management. However it took them quite long as it was too late for the teams to show effective results and drastic measure had to be taken by the management.
The mismatch of skills of team members clearly shows that employees were not given proper job skills training. Members were not cross trained in each others area. Apart from that it seems also the team members lack quality and actions skills even though some problem solving skills training was given. Fundamentally 3 categories of trainings are important for effective team performance,...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document