Drug Testin for Welfare Recipiants

Only available on StudyMode
  • Download(s) : 136
  • Published : May 7, 2013
Open Document
Text Preview
Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients

In the last couple years there has been a debate weather to drug test welfare

recipiants. As of March 28, 2013, at least 29 states have proposed legislation requiring

some form of drug testing or screening for public assistance recipients in 2013. At least

seven states including: Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee and

Utah, have passed legislation regarding drug testing or screening for public assistance

applicants or recipients. The purpose of the bill has been said to help recipients be

available for a job. Many people agree with drug testing and feel if welfare recipients

choose to spend the money of taxpayers on drugs or alcohol, they are taking advantage of

the system and should not be entitled to benefits. This is true but not all welfare people

have a problem with drugs and alcohol. So why should anyone be tested unless they are

suspicious of it? Some say its unfair to drug test an applicant without reason to believe

that drugs were being used or is it? ( http://voicepopstar.hubpages.com/hub/Pros-and-Cons-for-Drug-Testing-Welfare-Recipents)

The way proponents of the new drug testing initiative and lawmakers who sign it into

the policy sees it as not being fair to ask taxpayers to pay for the drug addiction of those

who are receiving welfare if they are, in fact, using those funds to buy heroin, cocaine,

crystal meth, and such. So the best thing they could come up with was to test the

recipients for drugs. They had to come up with some way to control people from doing

drugs and to get a job. The recipients are required to pay for the testing but if negative

they will get reimbursed. Drug testing will reveal recipients who are wasting taxpayers'

money on drugs and will require recipients to stay free of drug use, making them

employable. ( http://www.aclu.org/blog/tag/drug-testing-welfare-recipients)

They have been trying to pass this law in many states for years. The bill never took

until now. There is people on welfare longer then some should be, only because they

don’t want to work, have a drug problem, or some psychological reason. The incentive

not to use drugs is a positive aspect to the new legislation. If knowing that your cash aid

depended upon your ability to produce a clean sample and pass a drug test could help you

to stay clean, then it’s likely that you’ll be able to spend your time going to school or

looking for a better job that pays more than welfare and so more quickly reduce your need

for state assistance.

The supporters of many drug testing bills say the rules are intended to help people stay

healthy, avoid substance abuse problems and eliminate fraud. If people test positive they

will be kicked of welfare. They believe there is to many people that are not using the

system fairly “Why pay someone not to work when he has taken himself out of the hiring

pool?” ( JACK KINGSTON[->0], U.S. Representative, Georgia's 1st District )

They hope that people will get a job and stay off drugs. The government believe by

passing the bill could minimize the purchase of illegal drugs, making our children and

society a safer place.

On the other side of drug testing it is so unconstitutional and stereo-typical. It is taking

away their rights. Just because they do not make an adequate amount of money to support

themselves and their children does not make them any less of an American then anybody

else and doesn’t mean they are drug abusers. “The Fourth Amendment declares that ALL

persons shall not be subject to unreasonable search and seizure and the courts recognized

these laws as dangerous precedents to the government being allowed to run roughshod

over our rights, and that these drug tests that singled out one segment of society for

suspicion-less search...
tracking img