Tracy Brown
Kaplan University
Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients
When considering effective ways to cut government spending, each state should start requiring mandatory drug testing among all its welfare recipients. Cutting welfare benefits to known drug abusers will allow benefits to be doled out more effectively and efficiently to those Americans that are truly in need, diminish drug use in those poverty stricken communities that tend to rely on welfare assistance and take a chunk from the government’s out of control spending.
I think that this is an effective thesis statement because it clearly outlines my paper and it states what side of this discussion I have chosen to represent. It is stated clear, concise, and to the point.
Because mandatory drug testing for welfare recipients is an issue that is not in full effect, it may be difficult to find opinions from “reliable” sources concerning such legislation. It may also be difficult to determine long term effects of such a program like cuts in spending and reductions in drug abuse.
I will be researching government websites both nationally and locally. I would also like to contact local government representatives to perhaps get an opinion about the idea of said legislation. In addition, because this is such a new topic, there are many newspapers to research that will have the latest on states that want to begin developing the idea of mandatory drug testing.
It will be difficult to avoid logical fallicies on this topic. Because I am coming down on one side of this discussion and want to persuade my audience, I will want to use comments and information from those that view it as I do. Using statistics that are deemed factual will help in showing that these are not just biased opinions from politicians that are simply looking for another vote.
If I were to begin to persuade a city council meeting or write a letter to my local government representatives about the importance of mandatory drug testing for welfare recipients, I would begin by saying: Welfare is not an entitlement! It was never intended to be as such. When President Roosevelt enacted the Social Security Act in 1935, it was during the great depression, when 25% of Americans were unemployed. Since then welfare has generously extended its hand to millions of Americans (2012). When someone is benefitting from these programs, and is not deemed disabled, it should be viewed as a “hand up” not a “hand out”. It is an issue all over the country that welfare is being abused by its benefactors. Cards are being used for ATM withdrawals, to purchase liquor, buying cigarettes, and even gambling in casinos. Food stamps are being openly traded for drugs (Camden, 2011). Not to mention the deception that is occurring about how many dependents a recipient is responsible for. To be subjected to a simple urine test to receive money and benefits from the U.S, government is not too much to bear. It is no different than obliging to mandatory drug testing for a job. Florida state governor Rick Scott has stated that in his state alone they will save 9 million dollars a year because of benefits being cut due to mandatory drug testing. With these kinds of cuts in spending nationwide, it is sure to reduce government spending a great deal. Not to mention the effect it will have on drug abusers. Florida state governor Rick Scott has implemented drug counseling on a volunteer basis for those benefactors that test positive (Delaney, 2011). Cuts in spending, responsible distribution of benefits and reductions in drug abuse, this sounds like a win-win scenario for us all.
References
Author Unknown, (2012), The History of Welfare, Retrieved from: http://www.welfareinfo.org/history/
Delaney, A., (2011, November 27). Rick Scott Backs Drug Tests for Welfare Beneficiaries, Public Worker, and Himself, Retrieved from: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/27drug-testing-welfare-_n_983235-.html/
Camden, J., (2011, February 04). The Spokesman-Review, Abuse of Welfare Electronic Benefits Transfer Cards Targeted, Retrieved from: http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2011/feb/04/abuse-of-welfare-electronic-benefits-transfer/
References: Author Unknown, (2012), The History of Welfare, Retrieved from: http://www.welfareinfo.org/history/ Delaney, A., (2011, November 27). Rick Scott Backs Drug Tests for Welfare Beneficiaries, Public Worker, and Himself, Retrieved from: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/27drug-testing-welfare-_n_983235-.html/ Camden, J., (2011, February 04). The Spokesman-Review, Abuse of Welfare Electronic Benefits Transfer Cards Targeted, Retrieved from: http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2011/feb/04/abuse-of-welfare-electronic-benefits-transfer/
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Florida Governor Rick Scott made plans to test all welfare recipients to see if they are using drugs before they can receive payments is hardly saving the state any money, according to recent reports. At $30 per test, the state paid $28,800 in drug test reimbursements (960 reimbursements at $30 each, since about 2 percent also didn’t finish the application process) for those who did pass, while saving themselves about $66,000 in payments that did not have to be made for the year to those applicants that didn’t make it through for one reason or another (applicants receive $138 a month, or $1,656 per year).…
- 493 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Drug testing welfare recipients has been a major topic across the United States for a few years now. Many argue that if working class people are subject to a test prior to hire or randomly during the length of employment, why should those that don’t have to work for money not have the same treatment? Invasion of privacy is a huge disadvantage on the government’s part, yes it is free money but that doesn’t entitle anyone, even government, to control every aspect of your life or hold it constantly over a person’s head until they feel guilt or just flat decline assistance. Let’s ask ourselves just one question; if you went to the bank for a car loan, being this is a necessity for everyday living to own, how would you feel if they asked you to take a drug test prior to lending you the money? I feel many peoples’ tune would change drastically.…
- 1433 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
The, Associated P. "Growing Support for Drug Testing of Welfare Recipients." New York Times: A.18. Feb 26 2012. National Newspapers Core. Web. 5 Oct. 2012 .…
- 2044 Words
- 9 Pages
Better Essays -
In the current state of the American economy, needless spending is something the government needs to avoid at all costs. With some trillion dollars owed to various foreign countries, the United States literally cannot afford to pump money into programs that do not benefit the country as a whole. Michael Tanner, who is the Director of Health and Welfare studies at the Cato Institute, reports that this year the Federal government will spend 952,000,000,000 dollars on programs to help the poor (10). While some of this money goes to people who truly need it, there are many people that take advantage of the kindness of others. Robert Rector, who is the Senior Research Fellow in Domestic Policy at the Heritage Foundation, discovered in a study that one third of welfare recipients use illegal drugs. What the results of this study translate to is simple, that almost 300 billion dollars is fueling the drug habits of those who selfishly turn down assistance. In order to fully understand the nature of welfare programs it is important know the history behind them and the steps that can be taken by the average citizen to increase the effectiveness of said programs. Drug testing welfare candidates will save capital, discourage drug use in children, and stimulate the economy by preventing welfare users from using the government as a crutch instead enabling the recipient to become financial stable.…
- 2276 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays -
Firstly, drug testing would decrease the amount of people abusing the system. People who are drug users and refuse to stop or get help will not apply for welfare. Also, drug testing would send a message to society that abusing the system will no longer be tolerated and it would free up extra funds for families who actually need the help. Thus, drug testing welfare recipients would stop people who are abusing of the system.…
- 444 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Walters brings up arguments from both a favoring side and an opposing side. Favoring sides would not want to give someone government benefits if they are using the benefits to support a drug habit and could save the government money by denying applicants. The opposing side feels that drug testing would come to a great expense to the government and rather than drug testing an individual who needs help because of their drug addiction other programs such as rehab would save money to local, state and federal governments. The author feels that both are good arguments.…
- 566 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
work one day and mentioned to me that Florida is now drug testing their welfare recipients and so I started doing some research. The current situation in Florida is what ultimately led me to choose this subject as my research topic. Due to this topic being fairly new, my main research sources will come from trusted internet and library sites. There will be little material on certain specifics that will come from books. In…
- 416 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
There are approximately 30 million Americans on some sort of welfare right now. In 2010, the United States Federal Government spent $0.8 trillion toward welfare. The amount spent on welfare in 2010 is one of the top expenses, money spent on defense and healthcare were the highest expenses, but welfare was third (Chantrill, Christopher). The main purpose of an economic welfare system is to assist citizens who are not able to support themselves or their families due to unemployment, underemployment, hardship, unskilled labor capacity, disability, or other similar reasons. So why are there some many Americans that solely rely on welfare benefits? Welfare recipients should be drug tested. Testing for drugs among welfare recipients would save the US Government millions of dollars, it would help many Americans overcome their illegal drug habits, and taxpayer’s money would not support somebody’s illegal drug use.…
- 879 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
a.i) Government assistance, or welfare, is a very broad term. There are many different welfare programs available in the United States e.g., food stamps, cash assistance, and government housing. Currently there is mass debate, in courtrooms across the U.S., regarding the legality and morality of pre-assistance drug testing. This report is intended to familiarize the reader with the history of welfare reform; the histories of drug testing in regards to assistance eligibility; and persuade the audience to vote yes for mandatory pre-assistance drug testing.…
- 1704 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Studies of the prevalence of substance abuse among welfare recipients have varied widely in their findings, with rates of between 4 and 37 percent. Much of the difference in rates found in these studies is due to different data sources, definitions, and measurement methods and the different thresholds used to define substance abuse. Another difference is whether alcohol abuse and/or the abuse of prescription drugs are included in the estimate. Also how can we get true evidence when we don’t have the means to drug test these welfare recipients yet (US Dept of Labor, n.d.). Government should not be paying for illegal drugs whether its 4 or 37 percent of the Medicaid recipients. Employers require drug testing before employment so why should welfare recipients get the same treatment for the gift of receiving government funding. Its tax dollars of the working people funding someone else’s addictions. Drug use and use and its consequences affect all of society that is vital to a strong America. Drug use strains our healthcare, criminal justice systems and endangers the future of our young people with the overall strain on our economy.…
- 1409 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In 1996, the Welfare reform Act gave all the states permission to impose mandatory drug testing a prerequisite and guideline to receive and qualify for welfare benefits. Since 1996 there have been numerous states that have argued this idea within their house. Recently Governor Rick Scott, R Florida, states “ It's not right for taxpayer money to be paying for somebody's drug addiction, On top of that, this is going to increase personal responsibility, personal accountability. We shouldn't be subsidizing people's addiction." (Scott, 2011). The state of Florida approved this bill that took effect July 1, 2011. Governor Scott also stated "It's the right thing for taxpayers," Scott said after signing the measure. "It's the right thing for citizens of this state that need public assistance. We don't want to waste tax dollars. And also, we want to give people an incentive to not use drugs." (Scott, 2011) Florida is not the first state to pass this law; Michigan passed a similar law but was found unconstitutional in 2003. The court states that the law was in violation of the US Fourth…
- 932 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The biggest positive of this program is that it would deter recipients from purchasing and using illegal drugs. This might mean they don't even need the welfare in the first place. It could also keep children and society in general, safer. It could help social workers know when children are around drug abuse, and thus prevent further abuse in families. It could help lower the demand for illegal drugs on the streets. It could possibly even save the system some money, as those who are on drugs would not receive welfare. Also, it could create new jobs for people to oversee the drug testing.…
- 578 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Requiring welfare recipients to stop using illegal drugs is a must because it's a real issue in today's society. Most recent studies indicate that one third of welfare use illegal drugs. Florida's policy of requiring drug testing for welfare applicants, appears to have reduced new enrollments by as much as 48 percent. Applicants who use illegal drugs simply chose not to enter the welfare system. Of course, they could sign up for welfare in the future, but…
- 522 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Right now only 3 out of the 50 states require drug testing to qualify for benefits. There are 23 other states that are seeking to adopt this same requirement (Alcindor). Of the three states that currently require testing, Florida is the only state that has practiced this for every applicant. As a result of the legislation that took effect of July 1st, people seeking welfare benefits in the state of Florida will have to submit urine, blood, or hair samples to be tested for the use of illicit substances, and pay for the testing (Kondro E721). If the applicant tests negative, then they will be reimbursed for the cost of the drug test. If they test positive, then they are prohibited from receiving benefits for six months. The only way that they can reapply during that six month period is if they can document successful completion of a substance abuse treatment program that meets state criteria. If the legislation passes, then the 23 other states will follow through this policy as well.…
- 545 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Thesis Statement: By enforcing a mandatory drug test to all welfare recipients, you ensure that hard working people 's tax dollars are being used the correct ways, and not being used to support a drug addiction,…
- 898 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays