Preview

What Are The Causes Of The Civil War Confederate Families

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1965 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are The Causes Of The Civil War Confederate Families
During the Civil War, Georg a, a state in the Confederacy recognized that soldier’s families were suffering from having the men at war; the women and children were forced to take over the responsibilities of the men. “The Georgia government started programs that gave money and salt to the civil war veteran families”(Fowler, 2010. P.11) The Georgian government created the Soldiers' Families Fund to provide financial assistance to make sure confederate families had enough money to survive on while the war waged on.
The next time welfare would be addressed was at the start of the Great Depression. The Great Depression was a time when the United States Stock market crashed. The Stock Market crashed on the day October 29th, 1929; otherwise known
…show more content…
“The unemployment rate went from 3.2 percent to an immense percentage of 24.9 in 1933 and from there it went up to 26.7 percent. At one time after the crash, thirty-four million men, women, and children were without any income at all not including farming families who were hit more severe” (Rothboard, 2000. Pg. XV). Due to the economy crashing, the government was scrambling looking for things to get the economy back on track. President Franklin Roosevelt moved quickly from taking office wrote and got congress to pass numerous programs to help the economy know as the New Deal (Writers, 2009). The New Deal would be crucial if the country were to come back to an economic norm. One of the programs provided economic benefits to the Elderly and unemployed. One of the main parts of the New Deal was Aid to Families with Dependent Children, “This provided benefits to families with children under eighteen living with their parents, or families with only one parent due to death or just absence”(Shoffner, D; Tambarini, C. 2011. P.6). Another central part of the New Deal was the Tennessee Valley Authority Act, this act created …show more content…
Drug testing has its pros and cons. One pro is that it would immediately take off any drug users who could use the money for drugs or other illegal substances; adding to that, it would give people the motivation to stay off drugs for themselves and their families if they want to still receive government benefits. Some people look at it like, if people are getting jobs have to get drug tested, why don’t the people receiving welfare have to?”(HRF, 2014). One of the cons for drug testing is that people feel like it is discrimination against the poor. The poor believe that higher up people who are considered rich aren’t required to take a drug test (HRF,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Stock Market Dbq

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After World War I, the United States attempted to rebuild itself both politically and economically. Unfortunately, the United States economy was very unstable; therefore, the stock market crashed in October of 1929. Many people were investing their income and savings into speculative ventures and even borrowing money from brokers and banks in order to pay for the stock in cash. The stock market crash caused financial turmoil which resulted in many businesses closing and countless layoffs. With so many people unemployed or underemployed, businesses continued to fail and unemployment was at an all-time high. Also, the dust bowl was going on at about the same time, therefore farmers were hurting as well and crops were not flourishing. By 1932,…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roosevelt’s New Deal had a major debate whether welfare or new opportunities should proceed, because welfare gave the people necessary resources to survive like in the TVA act, however, the new opportunities such as the CCC act would not only benefit them and their family now but also in the future. Welfare wasn’t considered a terrible thing, the flaw was it only solved the problem temporarily and never really helped put an end to poverty. The Tennessee Valley Authority gave people in the southeastern part of the U.S. electricity, flooding control, and helped with economic development, but the act itself didn’t give people jobs or direct money. This really helped people get back on their feet since they now have electricity but more people thought it was better to have new opportunities and the CCC act did just that. The CCC act was set out for young, unemployed men to plant trees and conserve the environment. Working outside in the parks helped create the environment to be healthier while also giving all of the young men sturdy and new paying jobs. The Civilian Conservation Corp act gave many opportunities for thousands of men and also gave them checks that will help them get through the tough life today and possibly some of the future. These types of new opportunities are what helped society break loose from the extreme poverty in the Great Depression.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The prosperity of the “Roaring Twenties” had left Americans extremely vulnerable to the economic depression that they would face in the 1930s. On October 29th, 1929 the stock market crashed and in an instant the Great Depression had unleashed it terror on the American workforce. As a result, unemployment rates rose dramatically and by 1932 just under 40% of the nation’s workers(non-farm workers) were without work.(Doc. 8) Along with the unprecedented unemployment levels, bank and business failures mounted, and those in poverty increased significantly. Similar to past presidents, Herbert Hoover maintained the government’s laissez faire attitude when dealing with the economy and strongly believed in “rugged individualism” the idea that the American people could pull the nation out of the depression with ‘hard work’ and ‘self- reliance’. Despite Hoover’s best efforts, the American people had begun to reject this policy and the country’s morale continued to decline. But the election of Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1932 buoyed the nation’s hopes with his fresh ideas and…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The years of the Depression were disastrous. The crisis seems to deepen as the years went by. The unemployment rate peaked at 25% in the year of 1932. With no end in sight, the Americans people looked to their government to protect them against starvation, hopelessness, and perpetual poverty.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Roosevelt took office on March 4, 1933, thirteen million Americans were unemployed and hundreds of banks were closed (Walsh). During his First Hundred Days, he quickly proposed a plan known as the First New Deal, this provided immediate relief, and worked toward reform and recovery; which became known as the three R’s of his policies (Shmoop Editorial Team). This showed that Roosevelt came into office with ideas that came along with his background in government. He was aware of how to implement and enforce his tactics to the law, thus taking the initiative towards a visionary…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Beginning in 1929 with the Great Crash, Americans suffered greatly from financial instability during the Great Depression. In 1933, after Herbert Hoover’s failed laissez faire approach to the economy, President Franklin D. Roosevelt took office in the depths of economic despair. As opposed to Hoover, Roosevelt believed that the government had to step up and take an active role in the American economy because he saw the damage that a free and unregulated stock market could cause. In response to the middle class’s desperation, Roosevelt created many relief, recovery and reform programs to help Americans get back on their feet and prepare for the future, and which became the backbone of Roosevelt’s presidency. Roosevelt’s signature program was…

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Testing poor and working people for drugs is not a new idea. It’s a trend that picked up significant steam during the war on drugs when in 1986, President Ronald Reagan issued an executive order requiring all federal job applicants to pee in a cup. The order was quickly followed by the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988, which required employers with federal grants to keep their businesses drug-free. The act led to widespread drug testing in the private industry and, in a decade, the rate of drug testing applicants among large employers increased almost four fold, from 21 percent in 1987 to 81 percent in 1996 (Wessler, 2012).…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The New Deal Dbq

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Roosevelt did not manage to end the Great Depression, he did live up to his promise as he made every effort to provide “every man… a right to make a comfortable living” (Foner, GML, 810) through the New Deal. The goal of the first New Deal was on economic recovery and relief. The first New Deal did live up to its promise as banks were recovered. As stated by Foner, “not a single bank failed in the United States [in 1936]” (Foner, GML, 813). Although tenants and sharecroppers were often excluded from the benefits, the first New Deal also improved America’s algriculture through the Agricultural Adjustment Administration. Additionally, the first New Deal provided jobs for millions of Americans through programs such as the Civilian Conservation Corps. President Roosevelt even made efforts to reassure the public through his fireside chats. In one of the chats, he announces that, “...we are moving forward to greater freedom, to greater security for the average man than he hasever known before in the history of America” (Foner, GML, 830). The goal of the second New was on reforming the system and producing economic security to protect Americans from umemployment and poverty. Like the first, the second New Deal also lived up to its promise. The Works Progress Administration managed to support the umemployment and created jobs for many others. Most importantly, Roosevelt kept his promise by creating the Social Security Act during the second New Deal that provided aid for the elderly, disabled, and the unemployed. The Wagner Act of 1935 also provided protection to the labor force and was responsible for the growth of labor movements. While one can argue that the New Deal did not live up to its promise because it did not provide economic recovery and security for all Americans, it is still crucial to consider how Roosevelt, through the New Deal, did create jobs for millions of Americans and provided a new foundation for America’s economy and the federal…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There is much debate regarding this issue. Supporters of requiring drug tests for welfare applicants believe that there will be many people deterred from applying due to knowing they will not pass. They also believe that some will fail the drug tests. These supporters believe this number of people will be so large that there will be a significant decrease in welfare spending. Other supporters have said “substance abuse is a prominent barrier preventing people from making the necessary transition from governmental dependence to self-reliance.”(Targeted News Service) Opponents have said this is a direct violation of our constitutional rights as American citizens. Some have even said it is not right to assume that just because people are poor, they drug users. Other opposers of welfare drug testing have argued that it will not save money at…

    • 1822 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great Depression was a period during American history which featured the largest economic crisis the nation has seen to date. A combination of a massive stock-market crash and failure of the people to invest in government programs left many working ‘paycheck to paycheck’ so to speak, and even more completely unemployed. Banks began to fail, as more and more workers became unemployed, leading the country to a traumatic time of poverty. The Social Security program was arguably the largest leading factor in guiding the Country out of ruin. Passed in 1935 by Franklin D. Roosevelt, this act helped many unemployed Americans to receive financial security and assistance, as well as citizens of an older…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But it shouldn’t be stereotyped to only people who have a history of drug abuse. Because anyone could be a drug abuser but some people just got busted in their drug use earlier than others. Granting any financial assistance to the poor individuals with drug addictions, proponents contend, does little to help them. Giving financial aid is only enabling them. We shouldn’t pay for someone welfare because they choose to be lazy. If we can work they should work to, and if they choose to suffer than that’s on them. We shouldn’t have to get our paychecks shortened to pay some one who wants to not work. We got up and put the over time in so we could get some extra not to pay someone who wants to do nothing with their life. On the other hand opponents argue that drug testing is uncalled…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As of today, over sixteen percent of Americans are receiving some form of welfare benefits. “Welfare is classified as a statutory procedure or social effort designed to promote the basic physical and material well-being of people in need”: Welfare is provided by the government, both state and federal. (http://dictionary.com/browse/welfare) The government receives the money from the taxpayers in order to support welfare recipients. Tax payers are the working class. Seventy-five percent of citizens that are among the social class, also known as the working class, are required to take pre-employment drug screening. When citizens receive welfare; however, they are not required to take drug screenings, even though they receive the funds from the government. Drug tests for welfare recipients will be one way to start saving money in this country.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Welfare has become more accepted by mainstream American society, and it has become more of a long term commitment for some. More people than ever are now dependent on government handouts in order to survive, and the workforce is slowly shrinking as people give up looking for jobs and see government assistance as the only way to put food on the table” (Concordian).…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate over Welfare has been a hot topic in the U.S for many years now. Welfare in the U.S. started long before the government welfare programs that we know today. Welfare started in the early days when the U.S. colonies imported the British Laws. The laws made were established for those unable to work because of their age or physical health and those able to work just unemployed. When the Great Depression began, nearly 18 million elderly, disabled, and single mothers already lived at the bare subsistence level. Welfare does not benefit everyone, but who does it benefit? Welfare is meant to help the unemployed and also help is extended to the poor through programs that include Medicaid, called the Woman, Children, and Infants Program. Welfare…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Companies want their employees drug free in order to receive a paycheck. Welfare recipients should also be drug free to receive their benefits. It is a normal part of life to be drug free. On the other hand, drug testing for welfare has its cons. To start with, some people may feel discriminated. Although there are many people who are drug tested in order to have a job, not everyone is. Making everyone eligible for welfare undergo drug testing could be considered discrimination against the poor, based on the assumption that they are a drug user just because they don’t make a lot of money. The biggest con against trust testing for welfare, is that if one loses their benefits, the child of the person will lose them too. By requiring drug testing of parents who are on welfare and not receiving direct benefits, there could be a lot of children who won’t receive benefits that they may rightly deserve under the law. Chances are if a parent is buying drugs, the child is not receiving the amount they deserve. If a parent can not manage their drug addiction, they may possibly put their child at risk for malnourishment, or even abuse. If that is the case, and a parent is unfit and incompetent, they should lose all…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays