Language reveals one’s identity. With language, we can communicate who we are and what we think. Without language, we would be isolated. We would have no discipline, no past, no present and no future. To understand how meaning works, then, is to understand part of what it is to be human .Ultimately language is a necessary means of life, which some say that language derived from grunts and groans and evolved into the complex form that we know today. As a writer you choose the direction you will follow when communicating to your reader .To a degree you hold the “power” of defining yourself. Should you allow others to dictate you’re identity
We have three writers Kincaid, Fanon and Anzaldua, all with similar viewpoints, however all electing to communicate their story differently through language. All expressing their beliefs differently (between there tone, and careful choice of words), all speaking about events they have either witness and or experienced throughout their lives. All seem to be obsessed with their topic choice. Question that I have is if these writers are similar, expressive and passionate about what they do, then what makes one writer work seem more appealing, more impactful, and more powerful to a reader then the other? Is it the dialects the writers utilize that has the reader prone to one writer over the other? Is it the way the writer’s language translates to paper, and does that solely play a role in distinguishing them as a writer? Perhaps it is where they receive their education, which allows them to get their point across in a comprehensible way and keep the attention of the reader? By the way that Fanon, Kincaid and Anzaldua choices to convey language fuels them with the power, whether it is power that they receive from the reader, the power that is self-inflicted, or the power that is forced upon them. They all receive, utilize and gain from their power as writers. Just as knowledge is power so is language.
We have Fanon, a Negro, a Doctor, a Man, an Object (he, himself, not really aware of what title he will represent on what day) seeming to be imprisoned in his Black Man’s body but living in a White Man’s World ( Fanon wants to be looked at as man, a person, not by the color of his skin). Although Fanon himself is trapped he continues to criticize every writer that he references within his book (why reference them if you’re going to solely criticize them). How is it that you could feel trapped in your own human skin, however chapter by chapter criticize those that have made a stance for what they believe.
We have Kincaid, a Negro, a Women, and a Native; (she never really referencing herself by a title, nor does she disclose detailed information about herself in this book, at one point the language she uses makes it difficult to determine even her sex) Kincaid uses language to express her bitterness, fury, and resentment at colonists and the Antiguans for failing to fully achieve their independence.
Lastly we have Anzaldua, a Teacher, a Chicano, and a Woman (a person that has learned to embrace all three titles) who wants her readers to be able to comprehend the problem that she has faced with her own language. If we look at Fanon, Kincaid and Anzaldua they all have one thing in common, they all have referenced language in their own way. They also have one thing in which they go in different directions with, which is the verbatim that they use to convey the message to the reader.
Kincaid begins her book “A Small Place” utilizing a peaceful direction of language; however she quickly rises to a bitter, angry writer. I believe revisiting Antigua was the beginning to her fueled bitterness. “T H E A N T I G U A that I knew, the Antigua in which I grew up, is not the Antigua you, a tourist would see now. That Antigua no longer exists.” Kincaid remembers the area around her where she grew up, no longer exist due to...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document