The “Necklace” story is about greed, passion for more that what one can have. In this short story, French Writer Guy de Maupassant writes about Mathilde Loisel who is consumed with the desire to have everything that she cannot have. Despite the fact that she has a nice home and a great spouse, she is unsatisfied with everything in life. All she is a think about is riches and privileges that other people have. Her craving for riches is a steady torment and turmoil. Whenever she visits her rich friends she cannot help but overcome with desire to possess of these costly garments. Sometimes the desire even put her to tears. I think craving for these things is a way to complement for things she could not afford. She so obsessed of looking better…
It is nothing but human to want more. This essential quality is what makes people human. By striving to be better, this species has done countless extraordinary things by wanting to elevate ourselves higher than others. However, Guy de Maupassant’s “The Necklace” shows the story of young, beautiful, 19th century housewife Mathilde Loisel aspiring to be a luxurious white collar. Even though it is human nature to want more, Mathilde ravening desire to appear as higher class blinds her of what she has and becomes her own downfall.…
In “The Necklace”, Mathilde is seen as a poor woman who had low self-esteem and was married to a clerk. In this story, she was invited to a ball and borrowed a friend’s necklace. After the ball, Mathilde discovers that the necklace was lost. As a result, she had to search for a similar necklace and had to take out loans to make a purchase. She was forced to work for ten years to pay off the debt until one day when she saw her friend. Little did Mathilde know that the necklace she lost was worth much less than the new necklace she paid for.…
Every writer creates a unique story that takes a life of its own, and teaches us a lesson. These stories can be similar with the same themes, plots, and other characteristics however overall they are unmistakably different. The similarities and differences of, Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck and “The Scarlet Ibis” by James Hurst is the quintessential example of this.…
If you were never happy for what you had, and always wanted more, you would live your life like Mathilde. In the Necklace, Mathilde was a young woman whose life was great. She had a loving husband, a house, clothes, and food to eat. But in Mathieu’s eyes she had nothing, and needed more. In the beginning of the story, Mathides’s husband got her an invitation to a ball, in hopes of her becoming happy. Instead…
Mathilde Loisel is not a sympathetic character in “The Necklace” because of her materialistic and selfish motives. She is not just poor financially but also in character. She is always dissatisfied with her life. Nice clothes, expensive jewelry, a beautiful house, more furniture and rich friends are the only things she loves in her life.…
In these plays, they both found happiness in money. In the Necklace, Mathilde “had no dresses, no jewels, nothing. And she loved nothing but appearance of its possession, led Mathilde to borrow an expensive necklace from a wealthy friend to show it off at the ball she was invited to by the Minister of Public Instruction. She ended up losing the necklace and worked half of her life to get it back. Not knowing that the necklace was fake. She didn’t want anyone to know that she had lost it, and would do anything to earn money.…
about Mathilde Loisel a poor women who desires indulgence in leisure. She gets her wish when she receives an invitation to a ball. She borrows a diamond necklace from her wealthy friend, Forrestier to complete her attire for the event. “The day of the party arrived. Loisel was a sensation. She was the prettiest one there, fashionable, gracious smiling” (Maupassant 129). Happy night for Loisel, she goes home and remembers the night for the rest of her night. But not quite, Loisel loses Forrestiers necklace. Throwing her into debt slaving to pay off the replacement necklace, after years of labor Loisel and her husband pay…
The irony that is implied in the story is that in the fact borrowing the necklace was what the main character, Mathilde hoped would help her into the life she coveted, yet it was also what put her into a life of poverty. In the story, it stated that “ She suffered endlessly, feeling herself born for every delicacy and luxury. She suffered from the poorness of her house, from its mean walls, worn chairs, and ugly curtains. All these things, of which other women of her class would not even have been aware, tormented and insulted her.” This shows how Mathilde has a poor family background while compared to the rich classes for the women in that time period.…
In the nineteenth century, money was a symbol of power and wealth, for the amount of money a person has defines their social status. In “The Necklace”, the setting plays an intricate role in the decisions that Mathilde makes, and the consequences that come along with her actions. In “The Necklace”, Guy de Maupassant uses the setting to further display and develop Mathilde’s greed.…
As Linton says, “A status is closely related beliefs about expectation of those having status”. A simple way of identifying one’s status in the society is to see his position that he holds after a certain merit or biological.…
Both begin sad and then light hearted and happy then both end in some sort of dismay. Della and Mathilde are complex characters seeing that they both change from where they started. In the begging Mathilde is vain and only cares about luxury and finds her life insufficient. In the end it says "She came to know the heavy work of the house, the hateful duties of the kitchen. She washed the plates, wearing out her pink nails on the coarse pottery... She washed the dirty linen... And, clad, like a poor woman, she went to the fruiterer, to the grocer, to the butcher, a basket on her arm, haggling, insulted, fighting for every wretched halfpenny of her money" (Maupassant). She changes to working and insulted, she seems to give up the life of luxury. As for Della in the begining of the story she wanted to get her husband a present so badly and that seemed like all that mattered but in the end it looks as if she finally realized that her husband would've been happy even if she didn’t give him a present. Both stories have a very valuable message, be happy with what you have even if its not the best, at least you have…
The short story, The Necklace is a warning against the desire for wealth. In the short story we find Mme. Loisel, whose thirst for wealth and luxury destroyed her life. Mme. Loisel wanted to live a life of luxury and comfort like any other women. She was not ready to live with the simple income of her husband. She desired for expensive jewelry and costumes though her husband had a small income. She wanted to be a society woman who wears expensive dress and jewelry. Mme. Loisel was crazy to enjoy life to the fullest. This attitude is evident throughout the story. She loved to dress like the rich women of her society. She desired to attend parties like her contemporary society women. When she sat down for dinner at the round table covered with a three-days-old cloth, opposite her husband, who took the cover off the soup-tureen, exclaiming delightedly: "Aha! Scotch broth! What could be better?" (Guy De Maupassant, 2003). She imagined delicate meals, gleaming silver, tapestries peopling the walls with folk of a past age and strange birds in faery…
There are two environments in the story. Claire and the narrators childhood environments. Claire, who is grown up in a rich high-class society and the narrators poor and not very well trained socierty. In Claires society it is very shallowed and it is all about who you see and date, how you look and how well you are educated. The narrator is grown up in almost the opposite.…
Parts of this paper will focus on the structure of the short story, and the contrast between the two “worlds” that are represented in the story.…