Preview

Comparison Of The Necklace And A Doll's House

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
289 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparison Of The Necklace And A Doll's House
There are many ways how both plays, The Necklace and A Doll’s House, can compare and contrast. But I am going to go through the basic problems and resolutions they face. In these plays, they both found happiness in money. In the Necklace, Mathilde “had no dresses, no jewels, nothing. And she loved nothing but appearance of its possession, led Mathilde to borrow an expensive necklace from a wealthy friend to show it off at the ball she was invited to by the Minister of Public Instruction. She ended up losing the necklace and worked half of her life to get it back. Not knowing that the necklace was fake. She didn’t want anyone to know that she had lost it, and would do anything to earn money. In the play, A Doll’s House, Nora was having
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mathilde vs. Dee
    • 622 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mathilde vs. Dee

    In “The Necklace”, Mathilde is seen as a poor woman who had low self-esteem and was married to a clerk. In this story, she was invited to a ball and borrowed a friend’s necklace. After the ball, Mathilde discovers that the necklace was lost. As a result, she had to search for a similar necklace and had to take out loans to make a purchase. She was forced to work for ten years to pay off the debt until one day when she saw her friend. Little did Mathilde know that the necklace she lost was worth much less than the new necklace she paid for.…

    • 622 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Doll's House Analysis
    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    A Doll's House Analysis

    1. Two examples of literature that share the theme of relationships are William Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily” and Henrik Ibsen’s “A Doll House.” Although there is a love relationship between Emily Grierson and Homer Barron in the story “A Rose for Emily,” a deeper relationship exists between Emily and the town she lived in. An unsound relationship between the town and Emily is seen throughout the story. We learn about the connection between the town and Emily in the first line of the story as the unnamed narrator tells us “When Miss Emily Grierson died, out whole town went to her funeral” (516). We also learn in the first line that the town had different feelings towards Emily and the men and women…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Realism Reflects On the Ways of Human Beings in A Dollhouse
    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages

    How Realism Reflects On the Ways of Human Beings in A Dollhouse

    In the play A Dollhouse by Henrik Ibsen realism plays a major part in how the ending played out. Most stories have that happily ever after feel, but in A Dollhouse things are not as they seem. In the beginning it looked like it is going to be one of those stories with a happy family who seems to be the ideal couple with money, kids, and a nice house. However, as time goes by the plot starts to become more realistic; Nora starts to question her marriage and her sanity. In Brian Johnston’s essay, “Realism and a Doll House,” he discusses how verbal irony plays an important role in the play. The word ‘wonderful’ is used in a different context in each part of the book. The use of the word ‘wonderful’ in three different ways is a good way of foreshadowing the decline of Nora and Torbert’s relationship. In Oedipus the King, Oedipus starts out a proud man and then finds out that he slept with his mother, killed his father, and as a result was dethroned and banished. The mood of the play goes from light to darker as the play goes on and more is revealed. That is realism it is about the human condition; people’s mistakes, lies, and problems without sugarcoating it. Some people do not like reading books inspired by realism because it gives them a magnified look at themselves through the characters. So therefore, the human condition is what inspires plays like A Dollhouse and Oedipus the King into a metaphorical rendition of how human beings really are, and using the different context of words to create a sense of foreboding for the characters.…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Role of Symbolism in a Doll's House
    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Role of Symbolism in a Doll's House

    8- Ibsen was able to write this play externalizing inner problems with effective use of symbolism. Point out these examples and explain their overall impact within the characters and the overall effect on the storyline.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    A Dolls House" and "The Glass Menagerie
    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A Dolls House" and "The Glass Menagerie

    There is a common struggle between the call of duty and the desire to live one’s life in the two plays “A Doll’s House” by Henrik Ibsen and “The Glass Menagerie” by Tennessee Williams. Nora, from “A Doll’s House” didn’t realize her desire to live her own life until the end of the play and she dealt with the struggle by convincing herself that she was unfit to be a mother and a wife. Tom, from “The Glass Menagerie” always struggled between his responsibility to his family and his desire to be a merchant marine. Both Nora and Tom were trapped by the circumstances of life and needed to get out. Other characters struggled as well, and we can see this through character traits and flaws, abandonment, and character transformations.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Necklace Comparison
    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Necklace Comparison

    There are many similarities , and differences in the short stories “The Gift Of The Magi”, and “ The Necklace”. In the plot both stories are having an event coming up soon. In The Gift of the Magi Christmas is coming up soon, on the other hand in The Necklace with the upcoming dance. In both stories they have little or nothing for this event. In the story the Necklace Mathilde isn't grateful for what she has, and wants to look wealthy. In both Stories Loisel, and Jim are both giving up money, and possessions for the sake of their partners. Also when Mathilde loses the necklace she hides it, on the contrary Della tries to fix her hair after losing it, and doesn't try to hide it from Jim. In conclusion in the two short stories “The Gift of the…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Necklace: Devastation Greed
    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Necklace: Devastation Greed

    In “The Necklace,” GUY DE MAUPASSANT character loisel Mathilde who is a very greedy and selfish woman, believes that she was born for every delicacy and luxury there is and feels that she was made for all beautiful jewels and clothes, which cause her emotional…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Necklace By Guy De Maupossant
    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Necklace By Guy De Maupossant

    She wasn’t able to tell her friend the truth because she felt guilty and embarrassed for borrowing an expensive necklace and not being able to look after it. When they replaced the old necklace, they had used all their money. Mathilde’s friend was considered someone from a higher class and Mathilde was afraid she might think she was a thief for giving a different necklace back. After purchasing the necklace Mathilde’s character had a dramatic change. She let go of your maid and did the entire house work on her own. Mathidle and her husband also gave up their apartment for a cheaper one. She was no longer living as a middle-class life, but instead a poor one. She gave up her lifestyle and lived one that she had never imagined nor wished for. As completing all the deeds her appearance seemed to look older than before. Although, she lived a poor lifestyle she gained an advantage of becoming a strong woman. Yet there will be days she would dream about the ball and how happy she was. Mathilde realized that, “life is such a strange thing with its changes and chances”. This all allowed for her thinking to change, specifically towards her appearance. This allowed her to develop into a more responsible and hardworking…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Doll's House Controversy
    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages

    A Doll's House Controversy

    In the nineteenth century, and even before, society was not as it is today. A lot has changed since then, such as cultures, works, rights, laws and even society itself. Plays were a form of entertainment back in the days and even now. Entertainment has never been so pivotal for the society until the play “A Doll’s House”. Henrik Ibsen, the creator of the play “A Doll House”, have led the readers and public with the desire to study, analyze, comment, question the actions and characters of the play. In the play, a woman, call Nora, took a loan to save her husband’s life, Torvald. The problem of the play is that she did not tell him. Due to a letter Torvald receive from Mr. Krogstad, he gets to know about the debt. The husband reclaims Nora for her actions, calls her a stupid woman and then tells her she is not an adequate mother. As the result of Torvald acts and words, Nora decides to leave the house. Ibsen’s play has evoked a lot of controversy and new views of the…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Necklace
    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Necklace

    In The Necklace, Mathilde Loisel is presented as a hopeful ‘Glamour girl’. She finds the idea of glamour and the pretty and expensive gifts that come with it very appealing, however, unfortunately for her; she was not born into a life of wealth or money. Rather than living the life of her dreams, she gets married to a ‘little clerk’ husband in an upstairs apartment, which apparently brings tears to her eyes. Although her failure to reach her aspired dreams of money, wealth and glamour, should make the reader feel empathetic and sympathetic; the literal techniques and methods used (along with the general narcissistic…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Doll's House English A1 Higher Level Paper 1
    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A Doll's House English A1 Higher Level Paper 1

    The idea of the play itself makes it spectacular since nothing can be more fascinating than the emergence of a new individuality and a new state of mind in front of the spectator’s eyes. The main character, Nora, lives in her husband’s doll house, leading the life of a doll wife. When her husband falls ill, she borrows money illegally by forging her father’s signature to save her husband’s life, and consequently finds herself in an ambiguous position. Unfortunately, she cannot comprehend the severity of her decision to commit an illegal deed as well as to lie to her husband about it. This situation leads to her epiphany about the realities of the world, ruining the doll’s house. What makes this play fascinating is that contrary to audience’s expectations, Nora musters her energy to stop acting as a disobedient child and decides to discover and educate herself in order to find her individuality. Like a phoenix rising from the ashes, she emerges as a new person from her false life in a doll’s house. What the audience remembers in “A Doll’s House” is the message of the play that was very controversial in the times of Ibsen. The message that a woman can go against societal morals and conventions in Ibsen’s times would be a very notorious topic to discuss, let alone put in a play to be performed in front of hundreds of people. The play was even banned for a long time.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Doll House, NORA comparison
    • 1780 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A Doll House, NORA comparison

    It is fascinating how a writer 's personal beliefs, upbringing, and era can dramatically change a characters persona. One such character is Nora Helmer from a play called "A Doll 's House". "A Doll 's house" was originally written in 1879 by Henrik Ibsen. Henrik Ibsen was born in 1828 in Skien, Norway. Ibsen portrays Nora as a person with very low self esteem, untrustworthy, and self absorbed. During Ibsen 's era women where subservient and listen to what they are told by the dominant man in their life. Ibsen 's own views about women come through in this character. Even though Ibsen attempts to address women 's rights, he fails women by portraying Nora as a selfish woman who ran out on her family to fulfill her own needs.…

    • 1780 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mathilde's Change In The Necklace
    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page

    Mathilde's Change In The Necklace

    At the beginning of the story, Mathilde was selfish, ungrateful, and was always complaining about her life. After she lost her friend’s necklace and needed to work hard during ten years to get money to buy a new necklace for her friend, she blamed Madame Forestier for having miserable days since the lost of the necklace.…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing and Contrasting the Necklace, and the Gift of the Magi
    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Comparing and Contrasting the Necklace, and the Gift of the Magi

    The main character in The Necklace’s, and the main character in The Gift of the Magi’s, personalities differ from one another vastly. In The Necklace, the main character Mathilde Loisel is an ungrateful middle class woman who seeks riches and admiration. Alternatively, the main character in The Gift of the Magi, Della Young, is compassionate and works very hard to buy her husband a present, and ultimately, selling the one thing that was more precious to her than anything else, her hair. Mathilde is selfish, and when her friend, Madame Foreister is sympathetic enough to let her borrow her jewelry, Mathilde asks rudely, “Haven’t you anything else?” (Maupassant, ¶39). In contrast, Della is very appreciative when she receives a hairpin, and is very unselfish when giving away her hair to buy a present for her husband. Mathilde and Della are also both remotely poor. In the beginning of The Necklace, Mathilde and her husband were pretty well off, not too rich, and very simple. But at the end of the story, they are dirt poor, having spent 10 years paying debts. On the other hand, Della started out fairly poor, only being able to gather $1.87 for a Christmas present, but enjoyed life all the same.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Necklace Analisys
    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Necklace Analisys

    You could easily read the necklace as a symbol of "wealth" itself – flashy, but false, in the end. Perhaps the revelation of the necklace's falseness at the end is meant to mirror the falseness of Mathilde's dream of wealth. Even deeper than wealth, the necklace might represent appearance, the world in which it's the outside that matters. Wealth belongs to the world of appearance, because money buys glamour. Mathilde's unhappy because of the way her own shabby house looks, and the way her lack of money prevents her from wowing the people she wants to wow with her natural charm and good looks. The necklace is glamorous, and it also gives her the opportunity to be the woman she wants to be, for one evening. Beneath the fancy exterior, though, the necklace is not worth anything – it's a fake. In that respect, it fits Mathilde's own situation at the party: though she fools everyone there, she's not really wealthy.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics