A Doll's House Controversy

In the nineteenth century, and even before, society was not as it is today. A lot has changed since then, such as cultures, works, rights, laws and even society itself. Plays were a form of entertainment back in the days and even now. Entertainment has never been so pivotal for the society until the play “A Doll’s House”. Henrik Ibsen, the creator of the play “A Doll House”, have led the readers and public with the desire to study, analyze, comment, question the actions and characters of the play. In the play, a woman, call Nora, took a loan to save her husband’s life, Torvald. The problem of the play is that she did not tell him. Due to a letter Torvald receive from Mr. Krogstad, he gets to know about the debt. The husband reclaims Nora for her actions, calls her a stupid woman and then tells her she is not an adequate mother. As the result of Torvald acts and words, Nora decides to leave the house. Ibsen’s play has evoked a lot of controversy and new views of the
As time passed, critics continued to recognize how this play’s theme transcends its 19th century context to relate to the lives of people today. A Doll's House shows his gifts for creating realistic dialogue, a suspenseful flow of events and, above all, psychologically penetrating characterizations that make the struggles of his dramatic personages utterly convincing. Overall, Ibsen’s work created a social backlash with those opposed to the feminist movement. While women’s groups eagerly stacked up praises and honors for Ibsen, he fervently tried to disassociate himself from the feminist movement and satiate the critics with “humanist” rather than “feminist” intentions. His creation of an alternate ending to save himself from vituperative critics proves the extent of social upheaval created by his play in the context of the women’s rights movement in Europe and