Preview

Discretionary Power

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
812 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Discretionary Power
DISCRETIONARY POWER The power to punish a delinquent conferred on the disciplinary authority and the appellate authority is a discretionary power and the question what is adequate punishment is a question of discretion. According to Black's Law Dictionary (5th Edition) discretionary power means "one which is not imperative or, if imperative, the time, manner or extent of execution of which is left to donee's discretion."
Discretion, when applied to public or statutory functionaries, means a power or right conferred upon them by law of acting officially in certain circumstances, according to the dictates of their own judgment and conscience, uncontrolled by the judgment or conscience of others. Chief Justice Coke said : "Discretion is a science or understanding to discern between falsity and truth, between right and wrong, between shadows and substance, between equity and colourable glosses and pretences, and not to do according to their wills and private affections and opinions." Lord Halsbury says : "Discretion means when it is said that something is to be done Within the discretion of the authorities that something is to be done according to the rules of reason and justice, not according to private opinion according to law and not humour. It is to be, not arbitrary, vague, and fanciful, but legal and regular and it must be exercised within the limit, to which a honest man competent to the discharge of his office ought to confine himself -" Discretion implies power to make a choice between alternative courses of action. The need of discretion arises because of the necessity and expediency to individualise the exercise of power by the administration i.e., the administration has to apply a vague or indefinite provision from case to case. The sphere of judicial discretion includes all questions, as to what is right, just, equitable, or reasonable so far as not determined by authoritative rules of law but committed to the liberum arbitrium of the donees

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Con Law Outline

    • 5129 Words
    • 28 Pages

    The Executive Realm is split in half. Half of it is political/discretionary that is not subject to judicial review. The other half is a legal duty that is subject to judicial review.…

    • 5129 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abraham Lincoln exercised discretionary power beyond the limits of the Constitution when he increased the size of both the army and navy in response to the Southern secession that occurred when Congress was out of session. This power is specifically prescribed to Congress in Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution of the United States. Thus the power to increase the size of the navy and army reside outside of the executive branch in the safe arms of the legislative branch. Abraham Lincoln also exercised discretionary power beyond the limits of the Constitution when he suspended the writ of Habeas Corpus in some states. The suspension of Habeas Corpus is also prescribed not to the executive branch but rather to Congress in Article 1 Section 9 of the Constitution. This suspension of Habeas Corpus like…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Vocabulary Handout Unit 1

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Professor Segura has a facetious sign on his office door: “I’d like to help you out. Which way did you come in?”.…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Discretionary authority: The right to choose what action to take; permission to act. Each facet of the criminal justice system has its own level of discretionary authority. Whether or not each facet wants to acknowledge it, each facet eventually answers to the public. From a police officer writing a ticket or deciding to pursue a fleeing suspect to the probation/parole officer filing a violation of probation or parole – and the organizations in between – each facet must adhere to the policy and procedures for its own agency.…

    • 1812 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the U.S. Supreme Court, in its discretion, decides to take a case, it is said that the Court has:…

    • 610 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Case Against Tipping

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages

    3. More discretion equates to unpleasantness- When individuals are unsure how to handle a situation it can be unpleasant, but it also allows them the ability to determine on their own what is adequate.…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Executive Privilege

    • 2337 Words
    • 10 Pages

    A big argument for those against executive privilege is that there is nothing in the constitution about it even though there is something…

    • 2337 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    4. Judicial Review- the power of a court to adjudicate the constitutionality of the laws of a government or the acts of a government official…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In terms of Statutory guidelines a number of acts inform the exercise of Judicial discretion. The Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) is the primary source of sentencing law in NSW. It sets out the purposes for which a sentence and types of penalties may be imposed, when they can be used and also recommends general guidelines in relation to sentencing. The Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) prescribes the maximum sentence that may be imposed for various offences. It identifies what might constitute a mitigating or aggravating circumstance. However, it is left, to some degree, to the exercise of judicial discretion to determine the most appropriate sentence, providing it fits within the prescribed statutory guidelines. As well as this Judicial officers can be guided by former judgements in cases with similar facts. The Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act allows for the NSW Attorney General to apply guideline judgements, that will set out sentencing guidelines for a particular offence. These guidelines, although limiting the judicial discretion, are used to ensure the right to a fair trial, by limiting the amount cases with similar circumstances can differ in their final sentencing. Ultimately this means that, although judicial discretion is…

    • 1161 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Discretion is the eminence of once behavior or the way of speaking in order to avoid any offensive occurrence or speaking up any private issues or information in public. It is the self-determination for someone to choose or think what should be better to be done in particular circumstances. Especially for a judge, a public official or other private party has the authority to make decisions on any legal matters or other big official subjects. Thus, a person who is authorized with the power of discretion often thinks about how to apply the given supremacy.…

    • 1914 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Police Officer Discretion

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Discretion is a term that describes the flexibility that people like judges have when deciding the fate of offenders. They could choose to give someone the maximum penalty or be a little more lenient. This is all dependent on the situation and the amount of discretion they are given. There are many individuals involved within a case that have discretion. Three of the most prominent of these individuals would be police officers, prosecuting attorneys, and judges…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Meaning of Discretion

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    By definition, discretion means freedom to act or judge on ones own. With this privilege, evolves both pros and cons. A major problem which may occur are inconsistencies with the law. The same type of crimes may be given different punishments by judges. This would create controversy and accusations of prejudice and bias would certainly evolve. If the law were emphasized on discretion, the power would be mainly in judges and government official’s hands. It would be their responsibility that our nation continues to follow the principles of democracy and equality. If this did not occur, discretion could end up marking the downfall of our great nation. However I believe the pros overrun the cons in when looking closely at our legal system, in regards to discretion. In too many cases in our nations recent history, has discretion helped in making the right decisions. Every crime has different scenarios and plotlines, making it impossible for the same punishment to fit all the same kinds of crimes. This is why that in our legal system now, murder has evolved into manslaughter and other types of crimes. I believe that the best legal system looks at every case as a separate entity, and is run by judges that have no bias and do not look at any other factors besides, what is true justice. Our country will continue to evolve if we continue to use the component of discretion in our legal system.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Constitution is often loosely interpreted to meet the issues of the present. In the words of former Justice Charles Evans Hughes, "We are under a Constitution, but the Constitution is what the judges say it is”. (Hughes) Judicial activism and judicial restraint are the philosophy and the reason behind the majority of judicial decisions. Most people are often confused over the true meaning and their proper applications. The theory of judgment that takes into account the spirit of laws and the changing times is referred to as judicial activism, and judicial restraint looks at strict interpretation of the law and the importance of legal precedent. To figure out whether a judge or court is considered to be an activist or restrained, you must look back at the history of judgments made by either the judge or the court.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who should determine what this means? How does one go about defining “good” or “reasonable” judgement? Porter explains that the American Court system has worked to limit the discretion of its nation’s people, which leaves the discretion to be decided by the “dominion.” Moreover, the political institution does not remove discretionary power completely.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Police and Corruption

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages

    people. The police is a government service to all people, but all people do not…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays