Preview

Directive Leadership-Toolbox's Autocratic Style

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
78 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Directive Leadership-Toolbox's Autocratic Style
The autocratic style is one of the most recognized forms of directive leadership. At first, the style seems to contradict many modern work environments that emphasize teamwork, group input and shared decision-making. However, certain conditions and specific industries, such as the military, manufacturing and construction, thrive when a leader takes tight control and makes most of the decisions, according to Leadership-Toolbox. Even so, the most effective autocratic leaders remember to communicate task expectations and to respect their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This article is really enlightening on the way autocratic managers affect their subordinates. I was always under the impression that even though an autocratic leader may be frustrating, they are at least very effective. This article shows that they can be for a while but it brings into perspective the underlying prey-predator relationship between the autocratic manager and his subordinates and how that can tear…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    2. Autocratic leader benefits those employees who require close supervision. Creative employees who thrive in group functions detest this leadership style.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Autocratic leadership has benefits in some circumstances where a leader needs to take sole control of a situation with no one causing any distractions from the task in hand to enable the quick and efficient completion of…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Robbins & Judge, the increasing rate of change in the external environment of organizations and the many new challenges facing leaders suggest that success as a leader in the twenty-first century will require a higher level of skill and some new competencies (2013). Effective leaders must be visionaries, inspirational, charismatic, strategic, focused, persuasive, likeable, decisive and open to positive and negative feedback. The most memorable leaders observe the dynamics around them and take pride in staying ahead of the game. Effective leaders learn how to overcome adversity and make sure that the same mistakes are never repeated. Oprah Winfrey, influential, dynamic, and powerful, has the leadership traits, characteristics and qualities of an effective leader. She is trusted, respected, and admired by people all over the world. This paper will analyze and identify Ms. Winfrey’s leadership characteristics and provide examples of leadership qualities that have contributed to her success. After discussing leadership theories and styles with my mentor, this paper will also explain my leadership style and my ideas and plans for improving my effectiveness.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Autocratic Leadership

    • 2326 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Thus, leaders feel that the best way to conduct their job is to practice different style whichever suits the best to the situation. thus a leader may use transactional leadership style, autocratic leadership style, laissez faire leadership style, participative leadership style, transformational leadership style etc. while practicing the style of autocratic leadership style, the leader would make all the decisions by himself, build strict guidelines which is to be followed by all the employees, having centralized power and authority etc. the leader using bureaucratic leadership style would have strict guidelines for everything while and would want all the activities to go as per the guidelines and may be lacking in flexibility and creativity in operations. A leader practicing charismatic style of leadership or transformational leadership style would be constantly offering inspiration and enthusiasm to its employees and gain high level of commitment from the employees towards the jobs and roles of the organization. A leader using participative style of leadership would be continuously engaging employees to discuss and participate in decision making in taking actions for long term and short term while using their suggestions to form the policies and in building the strategies of the future. A leader who…

    • 2326 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ilm level 3

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Autocratic leadership, also known as authoritarian leadership is a leadership style characterized by individual control over all decisions and little input from group members. Autocratic leaders typically make choices based on their own ideas and judgments and rarely accept advice from followers. Autocratic leadership involves absolute, authoritarian control over a group. It can also be derived as a dictator, domineering and aggressive behaviour. An autocratic leadership can be beneficial in some circumstances such as that decisions have to be made quickly without consulting anyone, also when projects sometimes require strong leadership so that things can get accomplished quickly and effectively. Some team members may actually prefer the autocratic style this can let the team focus on performing tasks without worrying about the decisions that have to be made, this style of management does have its problems managers / team leaders can learn to use the elements of this style wisely and correctly. As an example autocratic management can be used effectively when the leader has the most knowledge and has access to information that can make the task more productive. This style of management is best used when the team are primarily unskilled workers, casual workers or new starters.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Since 1948, the U.S. Army has taught its leaders that there are three major styles of leadership. These styles are: authoritarian or autocratic, participative or democratic, and delegative or free reign (U.S. Army Handbook, 1998). However, there are also several other styles discussed in…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Public Services

    • 2846 Words
    • 12 Pages

    AUTHORITARIAN: This style is also know as Autocratic Leadership, it is a dictatorial method of leading, low concern for followers and high emphasis on task, typically reinforced with threat, punishment, and often ruthless exploitation of workers, who have little or no freedom to resist or desert. This style is used when the leader dictates policies and procedures, decides what goals are to be achieved, and directs and controls all activities without any meaningful participation by the employees.…

    • 2846 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    My scores from the path goal questionnaire indicate that I am leading to two different paths of leadership. They are directive and achievement-oriented styles of leadership.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The authoritative style of leadership, also known as autocratic, is a style where leaders provide their expectations of what needs to be done and how. The authoritarian leader typically makes his decision without input from the group. This type of leader is seen as bossy and controlling.…

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Strengths of Autocratic Leadership Style are that they have improbable efficient choices made instantly. They get their work done as efficient and quick as possible. Their weaknesses are that some team members are not up to doing work as quick…

    • 4932 Words
    • 141 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Woolworth Management Concept

    • 2427 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Autocratic style used by Roger Corbett is referred to as the classical management style. This management style is one of the oldest styles used by leaders and managers, in which they make all the decisions and retain all power and is referred to as a one way communication system(7). Autocratic leaders are known to negatively motivate employees through fear, using front line managers merely to instruct and monitor staff of decisions made by the CEO, leading to resentment, no responsibility or accountability and a lack of experienced middle management.…

    • 2427 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Autocratic leaders also known as strict authoritarian leader do not consult with the workforce and take all responsibilities themselves, they wield a great deal of power and control over their team members . This style is used in situations were very tight deadlines and budgets have to be met and decisions have to be made quickly. Team members would be of the type X…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Post-bureaucratic practices in leadership have branched from bureaucratic leadership practices (Grahn 2008). Current leadership practices have grown into a hybridization of democratic principles and bureaucratic forms (Josserand, Teo & Clegg 2006), and continue to grow further from bureaucratic leadership methods. As such, we examine traditional leadership theories and explore its roots to bureaucracy. Firstly I evaluate the movement from the trait theory by calling on the views of Galton contrasted to Conger & Kanugo (1994) and House & Aditya (1997). Following this is an examination of Rosen’s (2008) article that exhibit soft power controls as links to bureaucratic procedures of the behavioral theory. Adding upon the criticisms of democratic…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In every business organization it would be fair to say that communication is considered to be the main vehicle to becoming a successful leader. Autocratic and democratic leadership are comparable in communication as both types of leaders communicate somehow with the workforce to run the business. However, both these leadership styles are very distinct in the methods of communication. According to Nayab, (2011, n.p.) an “autocratic leader adopts one-way communication”. This signifies that autocratic leaders communicate with their subordinates by strictly instructing the tasks that have to be done without taking any opinions into consideration. This can be useful to a business as close supervision of workers can lead to faster rate of production with less slack (Nayab, 2011). In spite of this, close monitoring can increase boredom in the work place as employees cannot work…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays