Preview

Damien Cervantes

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
701 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Damien Cervantes
Damien Cervantes
Kim Wombles
English 1301
October 19, 2012
Abortion: Right or Wrong? In the extremely sensitive topic of whether or not abortion is something that should be morally accepted or cast out of thought, there will always be opposing sides to the argument. Many people argue that variables such as rape, infection, and possible death of the mother should be considered for a fair and accurate argument but it all leads to the same question: is abortion right? Harriet McBryde Johnson was a woman that lived her life in a wheelchair but still believed that her life was just as important as everyone elses. On the other hand, Peter Singer is a man who believes that if a baby is born with a deformity or disability, the baby should be aborted to ensure the lives of the family are kept “normal.” Personally, abortion isn’t something that I believe in, but Peter Singer does do an impeccable job of proving his reasoning.
To start, Peter Singer describes the definitions behind his claims. Defining the difference between words like “Involuntary Euthanasia” and “Non-Voluntary Euthanasia” help straighten out some confusion on how he views the subject. Singer states that, “If a human being is not capable of understanding the choice between life and death, euthanasia will neither be voluntary or involuntary, but non-voluntary.” Basically, Singer feels that instead of involuntary euthanasia, meaning that the human has neither been asked or has declined the choice of euthanasia but killed anyway, the human was given non-voluntary euthanasia. In a way, Singer takes the blame that people thrust on him for his views and shifts it to make it seem that the baby being killed wouldn’t have cared one way or another about being killed because it “isn’t capable of understanding the choice between life and death.” Singer also presents the argument that because an infant has never been aware of self-consciousness, rationality or autonomy, they are not normal. In which case, killing



Cited: Johnson, Harriet McBryde. “Unspeakable Conversations.” NYTimes. The New York Times Company. 16 Feb. 2003. Web. 18 Oct. 2012. Singer, Peter. “Taking Life: Humans.” Practical Ethics. n.p. n.d. Web. 18 Oct. 2012

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Abortion is an on-going debate throughout the United States. Americans divide 50% as pro-choice and 44% on pro-life. (Saad, 2015) Majority of women side with pro-choice, and being a woman myself, I stand with pro-choice. I believe that it’s an individual’s right to decide what they’re doing to their bodies, and no one else should be allowed to deny them of said right. There are many different reasons as to why someone would get an abortion. Whether it be from results of rape, birth control failure, teen pregnancy, or whatever the case may be, every abortion is thought out and no option is an easy option.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a reflection, the Gonzales v. Carhart case in 2007 had a significant impact on the way abortions were performed. It established the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act which prevented D&E procedures, the dilation of a woman’s cervix followed by the extraction of the unborn child. (Kennedy 2) All doctors that knowingly performed the procedure were punished through the form of jail time or their license being revoked (Kennedy 8) since this was looked upon as inhumane. Also, making abortions illegal directly violates women’s human rights according to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The document states that slavery and servitude is a violation of the rights (UN General Assembly 1948), so the denial of abortions violates women’s human rights because their bodies are slaves to the government and they have to serve the government with their body, meaning continuing with an unwanted pregnancy. The document also states that everyone should feel secure and when this is not the case for the women that attempt to be an abortion; they fear for their life. Nevertheless, legalizing abortions is the best choice for the nation because it comes with benefits. Sadly, before abortions, they were many births that resulted in children being sent to orphanages since…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This essay was interesting, however it lacked a few details that could help readers better profit Mary Patterson. This essay allowed the ideas for pro-life stance to be explained without offending anyone or discouraging those who do support pro-choice. Abortion is always a touchy subject because people are always very passionate about it, but this essay didn’t necessarily take a stand on a side. The essay only highlighted what one individual did to help her cause and what motivated her actions.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Campbell discusses some of the issues associated with palliative care of newborns. His main points was concerning the slippery slope argument of euthanasia and how it relates to the situation and its unjustness. He states that these arguments are merely saying to the baby "as far as your interests are concerned it would be morally best if we induced a quick and painless death. But if we do, it will launch the rest of us down a slippery slope. So put up with your distress, and save us all from the slippery slopes" (Campbell, pg. 283). His argument is that while creating a quick and painless death for the infant may be cause a serious debate on euthanasia, we should keep the best interest of the child first and foremost. I do agree with Campbell…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Wilson he has demonstrated the ways of the human property theory to determine the moral status of the fetus. Dr.Wilson looked at the situation from a doctor’s point of view by suggesting an abortion based on scientific and medical means. The human property theory influenced Dr.Wilson’s greatly in my opinion. “Some of the characteristics that would give a being with moral status under this view would include things like, being conceived from human parents, or having a human genetic code, or the features of a human (physical human characteristics). And since the baby will be born without arms, the doctor might have found it just to abort the baby since it lacks the physical human characteristics of arms. However, if the baby were to be born with arms and just have down syndrome I’m sure the doctor would not be for abortion since there are babies born with down…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reading “A defense of Abortion” by Judith Jarvis Thomson and what he had to say with his violinist analogy involving the kidney replacement. I agree with what he has to say on not only abortion itself but, whether or not a fetus should have the right to the women’s body. I don’t think that the fetus should be given the right to use the women’s body because what if she does not what to have a baby and ends up getting pregnant anyway. Also, each time a woman engages in sexual intercourse, she is not inviting the fetus to live inside her body. This is why birth control and other contraceptives are not a sure deal when dealing with sexual intercourse. What if the birth control method fails and the women end's up getting pregnant? She did…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Neumayr is an executive editor of The American Spectator, which is a conservative journal devoted to politics and culture. In 2005, George Neumayr wrote in this journal an article called “The New Eugenics.” In this article, he focuses on the ethical and moral values of aborting a disabled fetus. In his article, George Neumayr uses three strategies to present his argument including giving background information about prenatal screening, gives examples of lawsuits, and how it has become a duty to abort a child with a disability.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patricia E.Bauer is an American former reporter, and the current bureau chief for Washington post. In her article “The Abortion Debate No One Wants to Have”, Bauer expounds on some of those in the general public who have no sympathy and are unconcerned about the connection between children’s with down syndrome and abortion. As the mother of a young beautiful girl with a disability, she expresses the eternal love she has for her child and the pain she has to go through when a not as much as thoroughly considered remark or question about Margaret is coordinated at her. She discusses the accomplishments that Margaret has achieved and the delight that she brings to the rest of the family. Even though, this article is very well elaborated but there’s quite a few critical thinking barriers that are present.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bill Muehlenberg a philosopher has an viewpoint that, “the push for legalized euthanasia is misguided and immoral because it is an act that ‘directly and intentionally causes an peron’s death’” (2015, Muehlenberg). He then considers it to be homicidal, pointing out that there's a big difference between deliberately ending a life and caring for one, allowing a natural death. Being an act of murder would be using euthanasia, he argues. Children offered this decision, it would be nearly impossible for an child to understand the finality of death to accept his or her fate. The pressure that would be upon the physicians and family would be way too high having that decision to tend their lives before the patient is ready for it. In Muhlenberg's…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    PHI208 QUIZ WK1

    • 1304 Words
    • 16 Pages

    James Rachels points out that when passive euthanasia is employed on infants, they typically die of:…

    • 1304 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The continued debate between anti-abortion lobbyists and pro-choice activists regarding the ethics of abortion has ensured a steady stream of written opinions. With fairly recent advances in prenatal screening, doctors can detect whether a fetus is healthy or not and more abortions are being performed due to this awareness. In turn, the issue of whether aborting a handicapped fetus is ethical or not is being much debated. Paul Greenberg, an editorial page editor of the Little Rock Democrat-Gazette and a nationally syndicated columnist, shares his opinion in an essay titled "Aborting a Handicapped Fetus is Unethical." (1996) "Perfect Babies via Abortion" Arizona…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jaime Alfonzo Escalante

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What does it takes to become good at math? For Jaime Escalante, one of America’s most famous teachers, it only takes “ganas”. As Mr. Escalante often explained, “ganas” (Spanish word for desire) will motivate any student to find and exploit their full potential, regardless of their economic or ethnic background.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unspeakable Conversations

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Could the killing of an unborn disabled child be considered acceptable in today’s society? Selective infanticide is a very controversial topic that many have argued about over past years. In her article “Unspeakable Conversations” disabilities activist and lawyer Harriet McBryde Johnson demonstrates her viewpoint on this issue. She writes this article as a story, with herself being the narrator. It follows her journey as she feuds with Peter Singer, a Princeton University professor, who has an opposing perspective regarding the killing of unborn disabled children. With this in mind, Johnson reveals her point of view using the strategy of a Rogerian argument and the rhetorical elements of ethos and pathos.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pro Choice

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cagan 1 Erica Cagan ENC1103.036/Prof. Bieze December 2, 2011 Word Count: 1147 Her Choice If a woman doesn’t have control over her own body, than does she have any control at all? Abortion has fostered one of the most controversial, contentious and ethical debates in the United States. People divide themselves into two groups: pro-life and pro-choice. Pro-life argues that abortion is murder, and the mother has no right to take the life of a potential child. Prochoice “ refers to the political and ethical view that a woman should have complete right over her fertility and that she should have the freedom to decide whether she wants to continue or terminate her pregnancy” (Bose). In 1973, the Supreme Court made it possible for woman to obtain a legal abortion from well-trained medical surgeons which was a giant step forward for women’s rights (Pomeroy). Undertaking an abortion is a woman’s choice and any proposal to take away this autonomy not only violates a woman’s civil rights but would also cause many more problems in regards to a woman’s health. A woman’s autonomy is the one thing no one should be able to take away from her. Abortion is an extremely private matter that the government has no right to interfere in. If the civil rights of a person entitles him or her to not have unwanted infringements by the government and the government tells a woman that she cannot have an abortion, then is this not a violation of civil rights? Without abortion, woman would be condemned into pregnancy which “forces them into submissive roles in society” (Pomeroy). Pregnancy denounces women to “second class citizenship, since in our society, mothers are second class citizens. Once a woman becomes a…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Abortion Debate

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Wade should be repealed.Republicans call for replacing family planning programs for teens with sex-education programs but only for teens who attend private schools. For many republicans abortion is unethical since to them this is taking away the unborn child’s right to live.Many conservatives argue that abortion is wrong because this kills innocent human beings, a fetus is a human being therefore, it is wrong to kill a human being. In Peter Singer’s Utilitarian argument about abortion, he states “To describe a being as 'human' is to use a term that straddles two distinct notions: membership of the species homo sapiens and being a person, in the sense of a rational or self-conscious being. If 'human' is taken as equivalent to 'person' the second premiss of the argument, which asserts that the fetus is a human being, is clearly false; for one…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays