Preview

Critically discuss the main research methods that are used in Social Psychological studies.

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2290 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Critically discuss the main research methods that are used in Social Psychological studies.
The purpose of this essay is to review the literature investigating key research methods that are used in Social Psychology, while providing an overview of the respective method’s strengths and weaknesses. The essay will also seek to review any ethical considerations which should be taken into account when pursuing a particular research route within social psychology.

Social psychology employs the scientific method of research to study behavior and as such has been defined as:
‘The scientific investigation of how the thoughts, feelings and behaviours of individuals are influenced by the actual, imagined or implied presence of others.’ (Hogg and Vaughan, 2011, p.8).

When a researcher is investigating a particular field of study they have several options available to them, surveys can be completed, their own intuition implemented, questionnaires developed or observations made, essentially the chosen approach will vary depending on a variety of considerations (McQueen & Knussen, 2006, p. 8). These factors may include the context, ethical issues and practical considerations at play. (McQueen and Knussen, 2006, p.8).

In most instances the research process aims to investigate, if a relationship exists between or among variables (McQueen and Knussen, 2006, p.67). The concept of causality or ‘cause and effect’ has been extremely important throughout the history of psychology (Baron, Branscombe and Byrne, 2009, p.24). Within a social psychology context the approach is to review the level to which a number of variables are associated to each other, when taken at a single point in time (Howitt and Cramer, 2011 p. 8). In essence causality is a statistical index or test, which describes the degree and direction of the relationship between two characteristics or variables. (Howitt and Cramer, 2011, p. 8). Thus it can be said that the stronger a correlation exists, the more confident one can be in predicting the outcome. This can also be known as the correlational



Bibliography: Baron , R.A., Branscombe, N.R., Byrne, D. (2009). Social Psychology. (12th ed.) Boston: Pearson Education Inc. Hewstone, H., Schut, H.A., De Wit, J.B., Van Den Bos, K. and Stroebe, M. (2007). The Scope of Social Psychology Hewstone, H. Stroebe, W. and Jonas, K., (2008). Introduction to Social Psychology. A European Perspective Hogg, M.A, Vaughan, G. M. (2011), Social Psychology. (6th). Harlow: Pearson. Howitt, D. and Cramer, D. (2005) Introduction to Research Methods in Psychology. (2nd ed.). McQueen, R.,A. and Knussen, C. (2006), Introduction to Research Methods and Statistics in Psychology Repper, K.K. (2007). The relationship between anger rumination and agression in childhood Walliman, N. (2006). Social Research Methods. London: Sage Weigold, A., Weigold, I

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful