Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Conformity and Obedience

Powerful Essays
963 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Conformity and Obedience
Conformity and Obedience The desire to be accepted and belong to a group is an undeniable human need. But how does this need affect an individual? Social psychologists have conducted numerous experiments and concluded that, through various forms of social influence, groups can change their members ' thoughts, feelings, and behavior. In her essay "Group Minds," Doris Lessing discusses our paradoxical ability to call ourselves individuals and our inability to realize that groups define and influence us. We, as humans, hold individualism in the highest regard yet fail to realize that groups diminish our individuality. Lessing writes, "when we 're in a group, we tend to think as that group does... but we also find our thinking changing because we belong to a group" (p. 334). Groups have the tendency to generate norms, or standards for behavior in certain situations. Not following these norms can make you stand out and, therefore, groups have the ability to influence our thoughts and actions in ways that are consistent with the groups '. Lessing 's essay helps set the context to understand the experiments that social psychologists Solomon Asch, Stanley Milgram and Philip Zimbardo conducted to explain conformity and obedience. Solomon Asch 's experiment in "Opinions and Social Pressure" studied a subject 's ability to yield to social pressure when placed within a group of strangers. His research helped illustrate how groups encourage conformity. During a typical experiment, members of the group were asked by the experimenter to claim two obvious mismatched lines were identical. The single individual who was not privy to this information was the focal point of the experiment. Twelve out of eighteen times the unsuspecting individual went along with the majority, dispelling his beliefs in favor of the opinions of the group. Why did a subject conform in two-thirds of the tests? Influence causes us to think and act in ways that are consistent with our group, especially when we look to the group as a source of information. We also tend to assume that a large number of people can 't all be wrong. Asch writes, "the sheer weight of numbers or authority sufficed to change opinions, even when no arguments for the opinions themselves were provided" (p. 337). Stanley Milgram is well known for his work with obedience to authority. His work, "The Perils of Obedience," studied whether average individuals would obey an authority figure, telling them to do something that harms another individual. In his study, the "teacher" is instructed to read a list of words and ask the "learner" to recite them back. If the learner answers incorrectly, the teacher is supposed to shock the learner, starting at 15 volts and increasing to 450 volts. With each incorrect answer the teacher is supposed to increase the shock. Although the teacher thought that he/she was administering shocks, the learner was actually never harmed. Milgram 's study undermined the theory that only the most sadistic individuals would submit to such cruelty. His findings showed that, "two-thirds of this studies participants fall into the category of ‘obedient ' subjects, and that they represent ordinary people" (p. 352). Milgram concluded that when a person is obeying orders he "views himself as the instrument... and no longer regards himself as responsible for his action" (p. 354). Milgram 's experiment proved that when doing a job as instructed by an authority figure the feelings of duty and personal emotion are separated. Responsibility shifts in the minds of the subordinate from himself/herself to the authority figure. There is a purpose for the actions or goals of the authority, and the subordinate is depended upon to meet those goals. Another important study in the area of social roles and obedience is Philip Zimbardo 's "Stanford Prison Experiment." A group of 21 college men were divided into two groups for a study on group dynamics. Eleven men became "guards" and the other ten "prisoners." The prisoners were given numbers instead of being allowed to use their names, systematically stripped, de-loused and given prison clothing to wear. The study was terminated prematurely due to the unexpected and disturbing results. The guards quickly became locked into the role of belittling and dehumanizing the prisoners. Although the subjects were fully aware of the nature of the experiment, given the authority, the guards transgressed the boundaries of norms that are considered acceptable. Zimbardo 's experiment demonstrated the power of social situations to distort personal identity. What social value did this test serve? Zimbardo proved that social roles might affect behavior more than personality in certain situation. Zimbardo writes, "abnormal social and personal reactions are best seen as a product of... an environment that supported the behavior" (p.374). Like Milgram, Zimbardo determined that almost all humans would do what they are told if they believe the voice of authority is "good." Through their experiments, Asch, Milgram and Zimbardo have proved that social influences can have a profound effect on individuality. One 's desire to be accepted can make them unaware of conformity or obedience to authority. The problem lies not only within the group, but also the individual 's acceptance of authority without question. Works Cited Asch, Solomon. "Opinions and Social Pressure." In L. Behrens & L. J. Rosen (Eds). Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum. (pp.336-342). New York: Longman Press. Lessing, Doris. "Group Minds." In L. Behrens & L. J. Rosen (Eds). Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum. (pp.333-335). New York: Longman Press. Milgram, Stanley. "The Perils of Obedience." In L. Behrens & L. J. Rosen (Eds). Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum. (pp.343-355). New York: Longman Press. Zimbardo, Philip. "The Stanford Prison Experiment." In L. Behrens & L. J. Rosen (Eds). Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum. (pp.363-375). New York: Longman Press.

Cited: Asch, Solomon. "Opinions and Social Pressure." In L. Behrens & L. J. Rosen (Eds). Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum. (pp.336-342). New York: Longman Press. Lessing, Doris. "Group Minds." In L. Behrens & L. J. Rosen (Eds). Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum. (pp.333-335). New York: Longman Press. Milgram, Stanley. "The Perils of Obedience." In L. Behrens & L. J. Rosen (Eds). Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum. (pp.343-355). New York: Longman Press. Zimbardo, Philip. "The Stanford Prison Experiment." In L. Behrens & L. J. Rosen (Eds). Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum. (pp.363-375). New York: Longman Press.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Essay On Conformity

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    However, the benefits outweigh the costs of deceit for the purpose of this experiment. Also, Asch’s paradigm was an effective method of research to show the root effect of models and non-ambiguous conformity. The confederates also acted as a valuable variable which allowed the implications of certain responses on the the genuine participant’s conformity or lack of conformity. However, since there were confederates in the experiment, it cannot easily be generalized and the ecological validity is also decreased. The numbers of trials and repetition of the study increases the…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jenness 1932

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The aim was to show conformity to a group rather than staying individual and the findings showed this almost perfectly with only three acceptations. The findings support the hypothesis strongly and show that Jenness’s theory was corrects that and individual will conform…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Conformity and Obedience

    • 3322 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Most people like to feel that they make their own decisions, but in reality they are often just ‘conforming’ by adjusting their actions, attitudes or opinions so that they fit in with those of other people, or just simply to ‘go with the flow’. This happens as a result of real or imagined group pressure (Myers) in (Cardwell 2001), and may result in a change in beliefs or behaviour. Nobody tells you to conform, and you may not even realise you are doing it as it is implied or implicit. Throughout the course of our lives we become associated with or attached to groups which will each have its own responses expected of it. As a bus passenger you are expected to behave in a certain way, although your attitude may not be as important. As a football fan your attitude towards your team is important where as your behaviour may not be as important. As a parent the attitudes towards your children are supposed to include encouragement and you expected to demonstrate protective and helpful behaviour. It can be found to say that recognising and acting within the pro-social norms of a group may be seen as a desirable act, whereas unthinking conformity to a…

    • 3322 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psychological researchers have been interested in the degree to which people follow or rebel against social norms for a long time. Solomon Asch conducted a series of experiments designed to demonstrate the power of conformity in groups. According to some critics, some of the individual subjects may have been motivated to avoid conflict instead of a desire to conform to the rest of the group. Nevertheless, many social psychology experts believe that while real-world situations may not be as clear cut as they are in the lab, the actual social pressure to conform is probably much greater, which can dramatically increase conformist…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Reading and Writing. Ed. Edgar V. Roberts and Henry E. Jacobs. 7th ed. New Jersey:…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Group influences on behaviour may vary with individuals, particularly with decision-making skills. These changes may occur depending on the effects of two major phenomena’s, group polarization and group conformity. In simple terms, group polarisation occurs when the decisions and opinions of individuals change or become more extreme when they are in group settings. For example, when working in a group, individuals tend to build up a stronger opinion while working with others who feel strongly about the topic, which often results in a change in attitude to those individuals who felt differently about the topic. Group conformity occurs when the behaviour of an individual is changed as a result of group influence, conformity surrounds compliance and obedience. For example, when working in a group, if a majority of the group agree upon a topic, and an individual feels different about the topic, they tend to agree with the others opinion, changing their behaviour even though they still feel differently about the topic.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    As social beings, with each one of us connected to a whole network of other humans and their associated beliefs, opinions and traits practically every conscious second of the day, it is inevitable that we will be subject to external influences. These influences come in all shapes and forms from a whole multitude of sources, occurring both consciously and unconsciously, instantaneously or over a prolonged period of time, with the potential effect of these influences ranging from the immaterial to the life-changing. While our susceptibility to influence from the connected world around us can be hard to measure given our constant exposure to several different influences, social psychologists have been able to study the world of influence within a group context with some success, led by the likes of Asch and Moscovici. The principal questions which have provided direction to these studies include why people conform in groups and whether some people more likely to conform than others. One will address these two questions in the text below, while also looking to explain what “minority influence” is, and how it differs to what is considered majority influence.…

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Zimbardo, Phillip G. “The Stanford Prison Experiment” Rosen, Behrens and Leonard. Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum. Second Edition New York: Pearson Learning, 2007. 389-400…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Y163 Tma02

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages

    For this essay, I will be discussing how groups of people that we have in our lives can affect us in both a positive and a negative way and how people identify with different groups, and drawing on appropriate evidence. Sharing some parts of our social identity can also influence people to behave or act in certain ways and membership of groups can be a positive influence on people, by helping to make us feel like we belong, giving us a sense of identity or status, increasing our self-esteem and giving us some sense of security and/or safety. At the same time, we tend to take on a role within those groups and often feel the need to bend to peer pressure in order to conform to tendencies within those groups and act in ways in which we would not normally behave. This can lead to competitiveness, prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination against others outwith our social groups. I will now look at three extracts of experiments, mentioned in Spoors et al (2007), and describe how membership of groups can influence people both positively and negatively.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conformity and Obedience

    • 2549 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Asch and his students did many variations of the study for example they altered the differences between the line lengths making them much smaller and so the correct answer was much less certain, this showed that the conformity increased. What seems to happen is that we have more need for a groups input as a task becomes more difficult. If in the beginning of Asch's experiment we conformed because we didn't want to be embarrassed then in the more ambiguous situation we also ‘conform' because we are less sure of ourselves and so the others in the group become our source of information. This is an example of the difference between normative influence and informational influence. Normative influence is where we have a need psychologically to be accepted and do not want to risk not being accepted. Humans have a need for social approval by conforming then we are…

    • 2549 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Do People Conform?

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The causes of conformity among individuals have long been debated and researched in recent decades. It is for this reason that conformity is an intriguing psychological concept. It causes sound-minded individuals to go against their best judgement, to engage in behaviour which they usually would not engage in, even accept and welcome an idea they internally disagree with, all in order to not be a deviant from the group. It is thus interesting to look at the factors which cause people to conform, to do what they see others doing, to rely on the judgements of the group, and to ignore their own senses and perceptions. It is the reasons for the individual's desire to conform that I will be discussing in this paper.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conformity experiments demonstrate a person’s behavior based on the group's decision regardless whether the individual knows it’s wrong. The factors the contribute to a personal judgment that leads to conformity are peer pressure and the social influence to fit in ("Module 11.4: Conformity, Compliance, and Obedience." n.d). For example, a person will more likely agree on the wrong answer in history class if the other students chose that answer as well. This is also another reason why election votes are held in private areas, so the person’s vote would not impact by a group.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, it can be a challenge to blend in. In Doris Lessing's article, “Group Minds”, she tries to emphasize that people need to be cautious about group compulsion. The article was to demonstrate how human beings will go against their own belief in order to please the group. The aspiration to fit into a group is something humans tend to need moreover want. Many feel the need to belong to a group in order to avoid the emptiness they feel. When people are in a group, they have the tendency to have the same thought process and think the same as the majority. Individuals’ begin to slowly change over time in order to remain with the rest. Lessing tries to indicate the variety of ways a person is influenced by group pressure.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the reading “The Untouchables” written by Friedman, the issue of getting a job and keeping it in the modern world is discussed. The Friedman explains that in order for a person to get a job in the modern world and be able to keep it, one has to have the right mindset. The author supports this by describing the qualities that a person should have, and the work that needs to be put into getting a job and keeping it.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    c. Research from Terry and Hogg (1996) from the social identity approach proposes that group norms influence thinking and behaviour particularly if individuals belong to an in-group norm. Individuals who want to psychologically belong to their in-group would feel obliged to adopt the thoughts and behaviours of the in-group. Therefore it can be concluded that in-group norms determine the ideas and behaviours of members.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays