Preview

Comparing The Fall Of The Gupta And Persian Empire

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
574 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing The Fall Of The Gupta And Persian Empire
The Gupta and Persian civilization were similar in the fact that the fall of the empire was because of internal conflict but, they are different in their treatment of women and architectural style. The Gupta Empire treated women in their civilization much harsher than the women in the Persian Civilization. The Gupta and Persian Empires both had very unique architectural styles that represented each Empire’s beliefs.

The Gupta Empire flourished between 320 to 550 CE in modern day India. The fall of the Gupta Empire was cause by internal and external corruption. Internally the Empire had way too much going on. First, the Empire was way too large. Second, the leaders of the Gupta Empire were too weak to control such a big civilization.
…show more content…
The Guptas built many temples using their sculptural architectural style. Gupta temples were usually very large and filled with elaborate carvings. The Guptas built most temples for religious deities. Most Gupta temples were built of sandstone, granite, and brick. “… there is no doubt that during the Gupta period Indian art experienced its greatest creative growth, which ultimately produced a quality of art that has not been surpassed in India since that time. Some of the sculpture created then is among the best in the world… design by the Gupta artist not only influenced Gupta art but also determined the course of Indian art for centuries following the decline of the Gupta dynasty” (Allen, 101). The Persian Empire’s architecture was mostly known for its simplicity and clarity. Persian architecture was heavily by the Greeks and Egyptians. Columns were heavily used in the Persian Empire. The columns in Persian architecture were slender and closely fluted. “… Persian architecture was the end of a good quality of the spirit, a feeling for the abstract as form in architecture” (Wright, 192).

Both the Gupta and the Persian Empire both share many similarities and differences. They were two very important civilizations that contributed their many accomplishments during the very short time each empire had to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Han dynasty and Mauryan/Gupta empires developed in roughly the same time frame and overlapped in the years 320 B.C.E. - 220 C.E. developing in different parts of the globes with their own unique geographies. Both the Han and Mauryan/Gupta empires developed bureaucratic governments that were ruled by kings, but due to the different geographical regions, India’s government was fragmented into local governments. The Han Dynasty of China was structured off of a social philosophy while Mauryan/Gupta India followed a religion which united the subcontinent. The Han and Mauryan/Gupta empires also both developed agrarian economies although their view on the merchant class were nearly opposite.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman and Han empires were similar in their falls because of they both fell to nomadic invaders. Nomads attacked the empires to try and conquer them. The Romans were attacked by Germanic tribes and Han China was attacked by the Huns. Because both empires borders were so large, they were unable to fully protect their borders making it easy for their invaders to defeat them. The Han and the Roman Empires failing due to nomadic invaders is similar to the fall of the Gupta because one of the main reasons they fell was because of nomadic invaders conquering them and then splitting them up into regional kingdoms.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    India was ruled mainly by regional princes; however some kings with large armies and high taxes did emerge. Also, the lack of political service in India was a factor…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Han China and Gupta India

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During the Han dynasty, China successfully improved its bureaucracy, but in India local rulers maintained regional control. India’s territory never grew to be as large as China’s, so different forms of government were needed for each civilization. Han China retained the centralized government formed by the Qin, and expanded the bureaucracy. The bureaucratic system suited China, because it was able to support the civilization as it expanded into a large empire. The emperor Wu Ti created civil service examinations for his bureaucrats, which could be taken by any male. Wu Ti also urged Confucianism in order to gain support, as it urged respect for the government. On the other hand, India lacked an extensive bureaucracy, and local rulers were allowed to keep control as long as they remained loyal to Gupta authority. Because of its separated regions, it was very difficult to politically unify India. Similar to China, the Gupta rulers turned to religion to strengthen support for the government. In contrast to China, they favored Hinduism because they claimed to be appointed by Hindu gods. Additionally, Hinduism encouraged the rigid caste system. The empires were also similar because political power was given to landowners. Although the Gupta period is considered the golden age of India, providing its greatest period of political stability, it never developed the solid bureaucracy that Han China did.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han vs Mauryan

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Han Dynasty of China and the Mauryan/Gupta Empire of India in 206 B.C.E to 550 C.E had many social and cultural differences which made them unique societies, but their political structure and form of government seemed to borrow ideas from each other.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial Rome and Han China had many differences involving religion, technology, and women in society, but the similarities in these three subjects outnumber the amount of differences. Women in Rome and China had many of the same responsibilities. Technology in China was more advanced, but Rome was on top of advancing the field of architecture. Religion allowed these two empires to be alike but also different over the course of their reign. Differences make an empire unique, but similarities connect empires throughout the world.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They both had a emperor claiming divine authority, a small bureaucracy, and divided into provinces. But in the Gupta they gave their local officials in the provinces power, and the Roman emperors still had complete control over the provinces. The Roman emperors even put statues of them in the provinces to remind the people who controlled them. Finally, the Roman and Gupta empires had very similar platforms to their political control, but their actual control differed in a couple…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Byzantine vs Islam

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There were many differences and similarities between the rise of the Islamic and Byzantine Empires. Both of these empires rise to power was greatly influenced by military force. The Byzantine Empire had both a strong navy and military, while the Islamic Empire had the Rashidun Army. Another key similarity in the rising of the two empires was the influence of trade. Both of the empires helped develop and come to be through traveling merchants along the Silk Road. Even though how the empires cam to rise was very similar, there were many differences, such the different types of governments they used in the rise of the empires. The Byzantine Empire was an absolute monarchy having a secular absolute ruler, while the Islamic Empire was a Caliphate, which was an aristocratic-constitutional Republic.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Classical China and Classical India are one of the most unique early civilizations during the Classical Period. They are known for their contributions to its modern world. China and India are similar and different in many ways. Both China and India had many similarities and differences in politics, economics, and religion.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Firstly, one of the major similarities would be the way both empires fell. They were both very powerful and ruled large portions of the world. The main reason of their decline was their leaders being weak and not being able to support and lead them. Individuals who solely wanted power hurt both empires. They were both hurt by the frequent attacks from various tribes, and they were too spread out to regenerate what they had lost because they didn’t have as much control in some places as they did in others. You could say that the main reason of their downfall was their lack of leadership, and that lack of leadership is what still kills societies today.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman Empire and the Han dynasty were two of the most influential civilizations of all time. Their government, cultural ways of life, and philosophies are still used and widely practiced in today's world. Even though the empires were many miles a part, they both shared similarities in running their empires. Also despite the very strong numbers and size of each society, both eventually fell under. The decline of each empire is very unique though the empires had many differences in the reasons and severity for their fall, which included politics, invasions, and social decay. However they also portrayed similarities through those three topics. It is amazing how the Roman Empire which was established in 27 B.C and the Han Dynasty established in 206 B.C.E but have so much in common. While the Roman Empire was just being created, the Han dynasty had been up and running for 179 years. It is interesting that their beliefs in the way they thought about religion, government and the treatment of women were so similar as well.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ottoman Empire and the Safavid Empire were both Muslim Empires, along with the Mughal Empire, which developed around the same time in history. The Ottoman Empire and the Safavid Empire were both very significant and successful empires in the Middle East. The Ottoman Empire is similar to the Safavid Empire because they share similar intellectual style and development, and they share similar artistic styles. The Ottoman Empire differs from the Safavid Empire because of the difference in their religious beliefs.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Europe and India have some similarities such as they both have centralized “imperial rules”. In India after the Gupta dynasty fell, they still had a centralized government as Traditions & Encounters a global perspective on the past by Jerry Bentley says…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    She includes the Persian Empire in her book because they had military and economic strength. They were skilled in using the strengths of the people they conquered to succeed.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Buddha Shakyamuni

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Gupta rulers were Hindu, yet actively practiced Buddhism as well. They were patrons of art, religion, and sciences. The Gupta style and its images of Buddha were to be greatly significant for the many regional schools of sculpture that came to be at a later time all over…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays