Preview

Comparing Punishment: Utilitarian And Retributive Theories

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
209 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Punishment: Utilitarian And Retributive Theories
In the philosophical debate on punishment scientists have been able to identify two main theories of punishment: utilitarian and retributive theories (Banks, 2013). These theories have been able to turn and generate discussions on punishment concerning deterrence, retribution, incapacitation and rehabilitation. However, these theories have been able to set forth a goal for punishment and various ways to prevent future crimes from happening (deterrence). Utilitarian thrive to achieves goals on punishment and preventing crimes from repeating itself (Lilly et al., 2011). To utilitarian philosophers, such as Bentham and Beccaria, punishment could only be justified if the harm of a crime was greater than an inflicted on an offender. According to
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Deterrence Theory Of Prison Sentencing
    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Deterrence Theory Of Prison Sentencing

    This week’s reading focuses on the various types of sentencing theories, the types of sentencing options, and how they are applied. I found the just deserts and retribution perspectives to be interesting. While these theories are similar in their favoring of proportionality in sentencing, they differ in terms of when prison sentences should be imposed and the length of prison sentences (when they are imposed). Retributionists believe that individuals that cause harm should be inflicted with the same level of pain and that prisons strictly used for punishment.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Theories Of Justice: Utilitarianism, Retribution And Restitution
    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page

    Theories Of Justice: Utilitarianism, Retribution And Restitution

    Aristotle once said, “It is in justice that the ordering of society is centered”. In our society there are theories of justice, which is Retribution, Utilitarianism and Restitution. These forms have similarities and differences and are use in many different social groups every day.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Feinberg's Theory of Punishment
    • 859 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Feinberg's Theory of Punishment

    The main idea of punishment using the idea of utilitarianism is that punishment should be created solely for the reason of deterrence. There are two different levels of deterrence, and they are specific…

    • 859 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Consequentialist And Non-Retribution Theory Essay
    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Consequentialist And Non-Retribution Theory Essay

    According to Duff and Garland, what are the central differences between ‘consequentialist’ and ‘non-consequentialist’ (often referred to as ‘retributivist’) theories of punishment?…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Punishment
    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of Punishment

    As previously mentioned, if the punishment is not harsh enough the result is repeated offense. If a criminal relishes in committing a crime and the court system does not properly punish them for it, then they actually have no reason not to repeat the crime over again. The National Institute of Justice, part of the U.S department of Justice, studied how likely criminals are to relapse after being released, claiming that “Within five years of release, about three-quarters (76.6 percent) of released prisoners were rearrested” (Durose, Cooper, and Howard). This statistic proves that there is a significant chance that a criminal will indeed carry out the same action as before. The most significant way that an offender is punished is through what…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Deterrence Theory: Applying Fearful Consequences To Criminals
    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Deterrence Theory: Applying Fearful Consequences To Criminals

    Historical theories of punishment were based on the concept that applying fearful consequences to criminals would discourage any potential offenders. During the late 1700’s, a criminologist by the name of Cesar Beccaria argued the fact that the death penalty served no purpose as a form of punishment, let alone as a deterrence to criminals. He advocated to reform the criminal justice system through penology, concerning specifically with punishment and deterrence (Beccaria, 2009). In the following essay, Beccaria’s theory of punishment will be thoroughly…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Four Requirements For Punishment In The Criminal Justice System
    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Four Requirements For Punishment In The Criminal Justice System

    Moving forward, we examine the rehabilitation view. This view of punishment fails the guilt requirement because the criminal justice system would have to sort out all the potential criminals from society and attempt to rehabilitate them and attempt to make them into a better person, which would be nearly impossible. It also fails the equal treatment requirement because each criminal would require a different form of…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Purpose and History
    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Purpose and History

    Let’s first begin with what punishment means. Punishment is the infliction or imposition of a penalty as retribution for an offense. While completing my research I was able to stumble across two definitions that caught my attention. The general definition for punishment is “aversive stimulus that follows an undesirable behavior, and is intended to decrease or eliminate the occurrence of that behavior. It may be triggered either due to the performance of an undesirable act (negligence) or the non-performance of a desirable act (disobedience). Punishments take the form of presentation of an unpleasant stimulus (criticism or warning) or withdrawal of a pleasant one (employment or promotion). Threat of punishment usually also constitutes a punishment”. The definition of punishment pertaining to the law is “Confinement, fine, penalty, sanction, or loss of a privilege, property, or right, assessed and administered as deterrence or retribution by an authorized court to an entity duly convicted of violating the law of the land”. [ (Buisness Dictionary, 2013) ] Punishments must be adequate match the reasons why the crimes were committed. History shows that Cesare Beccarua who was an Italian theorist, first suggested linking crime causation to punishments in the eighteenth century. He is known as the founder of the Classical School of criminology. The classical School is the theory linking crime causation to punishment, based on offenders’ free will and…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy Of Sentencing
    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Philosophy Of Sentencing

    This paper is written in an attempt to comprehend the sentencing philosophy and purpose of criminal punishment through a review of the historical parameters concerning how sentencing and punishment serve society. Sentencing is the application of justice and the end result of a criminal conviction which is applied by the convening authority; followed by the sentence, or judgement of the court on a convicted offender. What makes punishment unique to our society is the application of our moral or ethical beliefs as a whole, and by the population at large. Throughout history, the sentencing and administration of punishments have been swift, brutal and often times ending with the death of the offender, but in our more civilized and modern society,…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Determinate Sentencing
    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Determinate Sentencing

    The purpose of sentencing: the “deserved infliction of suffering on evildoers and “the prevention of crime.” There four fundamental philosophies surrounding the purpose of sentencing. First, the oldest and most common is retribution. Retribution is the philosophy that those who commit criminal acts should be punished based on the severity of the crime and that no other factors need be considered. The second philosophy is deterrence. In deterrence, the goal of sentencing is to prevent future crimes. Deterrence takes a general and specific form. General deterrence is that by punishing one person, others will be dissuaded from committing a similar crime. Specific deterrence assumes thart an individual, after being punished once for a certain act,…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Criminal Sentencing In America
    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page

    Criminal Sentencing In America

    Criminal sentencing in America has long been guided by one of several different major philosophies of punishment, including retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation (Spohn, 2000). Retributive sentences involve punishments intended to exact revenge, in line with the biblical idea of “an eye for an eye.” This is based on the belief that some behaviors are unconditionally wrong and therefore justified of punishment. From this perspective, sentences should be equal with the harm done to society. Deterrence, on the other hand, involves a more practical basis for sentencing. It is based on the concept that crime is easily chosen as the result of a rational cost-benefit examination. Individuals will engage in crime when the benefits…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Comparing Punishment And The Criminal Justice System
    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Comparing Punishment And The Criminal Justice System

    Punishment is our current most exercised consequence for bringing justice to those victims of criminals by incarcerating offenders in a jail or prison, as well as other forms such as the community service, probation, and even the death penalty. While jail and/or prison life is necessary to protect the public by confining criminals away from public harm, I believe that “only” punishing dangerous criminals is simply not enough.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarian Vs Retributive Punishment
    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Utilitarian Vs Retributive Punishment

    In the United States of America, federal governments have several philosophies to maintain their states as well as support the use of severe punishment. Utilitarian and retributive is considered to be two philosophies based on the theories of punishment. For example, researchers stated that utilitarian theory of sentence seeks to punish and prevent criminals to do more harm, however, the retributive theory believed that criminals deserved to faced criminal charges (Punishment - Theories of Punishment, 2016). Some philosophers believed that the United States laws can be demonstrated as happiness of society under the utilitarian theories. Although happiness of society can be retrieving, but crime cannot be existed in society, so laws within states…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    criminal justice fundamentals
    • 1280 Words
    • 5 Pages

    criminal justice fundamentals

    10. What are the 4 utilitarian justifications for punishment? Deterrence, incapacitation and rehabilitation and specific deterrence…

    • 1280 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Philosophies
    • 353 Words
    • 1 Page

    Sentencing Philosophies

    The four fundamental philosophies surrounding the purpose of sentencing are; retribution, this philosophy is the belief that those who commit criminal acts should be punished according to the seriousness of the crime and that no other circumstances are considered, deterrence, this strategy is the thought that if the punishment given is severe enough that it will stop the potential criminal from committing the crime or to be a repeat offender. Incapacitate is the third philosophy that is a belief that if the criminal is detained for a crime, thereby being separated from the community reduces the criminal activity and once released will not be as likely to be a repeat offender. Rehabilitation is the fourth and final philosophy that surrounds the purpose of sentencing, some believe that society is best served when those who break the law are not simply punished but are provided with resources needed to eliminate the need or want to engage in criminal…

    • 353 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics