Preview

Utilitarian Vs Retributive Punishment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
277 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Utilitarian Vs Retributive Punishment
In the United States of America, federal governments have several philosophies to maintain their states as well as support the use of severe punishment. Utilitarian and retributive is considered to be two philosophies based on the theories of punishment. For example, researchers stated that utilitarian theory of sentence seeks to punish and prevent criminals to do more harm, however, the retributive theory believed that criminals deserved to faced criminal charges (Punishment - Theories of Punishment, 2016). Some philosophers believed that the United States laws can be demonstrated as happiness of society under the utilitarian theories. Although happiness of society can be retrieving, but crime cannot be existed in society, so laws within states
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Theories Of Justice: Utilitarianism, Retribution And Restitution
    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page

    Theories Of Justice: Utilitarianism, Retribution And Restitution

    Aristotle once said, “It is in justice that the ordering of society is centered”. In our society there are theories of justice, which is Retribution, Utilitarianism and Restitution. These forms have similarities and differences and are use in many different social groups every day.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Feinberg's Theory of Punishment
    • 859 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Feinberg's Theory of Punishment

    The Utilitarian Theory of punishment seeks to punish those that break the law in order to discourage or deter future wrongdoing. According to the Utilitarian Theory, law should be used in order to maximize the happiness of society. Both crime and punishment are inconsistent with happiness, and therefore utilitarianism believes that both of these factors should be kept to the minimum. The utilitarianism theory is ‘consequentialist,’ which means that utilitarianism recognizes that punishment has consequences for both the individual, and society as a whole. The total good that derives from the punishment must exceed the bad that may come from it.…

    • 859 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    David Boonin
    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages

    David Boonin

    Boonin’s view on punishment is simple, it is an intentional harm done to the individual that has violated the law. Throughout his work, he debunks the different philosophical theories to defend state inflicted punishment, and he reaches the conclusion that it is both impermissible and immoral. From this point Boonin takes on the moral argument that the only power the state should have involving justice is by forcing a system of pure restitution (215). The concept of restitution raises a wide array of…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Punishment
    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of Punishment

    As previously mentioned, if the punishment is not harsh enough the result is repeated offense. If a criminal relishes in committing a crime and the court system does not properly punish them for it, then they actually have no reason not to repeat the crime over again. The National Institute of Justice, part of the U.S department of Justice, studied how likely criminals are to relapse after being released, claiming that “Within five years of release, about three-quarters (76.6 percent) of released prisoners were rearrested” (Durose, Cooper, and Howard). This statistic proves that there is a significant chance that a criminal will indeed carry out the same action as before. The most significant way that an offender is punished is through what…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Criticism Theories: The Consequences Of Utilitarianism
    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Criticism Theories: The Consequences Of Utilitarianism

    Utilitarianism theories hold that the moral worth of actions or practices is determined by their consequences. An action or practice is right if it leads to the best possible balance of good consequences over bad consequences for all affected parties. (Arnold, pp 17)…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Should Rehabilitation Be Valued Over Retribution In The Criminal Justice System?
    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Should Rehabilitation Be Valued Over Retribution In The Criminal Justice System?

    Should rehabilitation be valued over retribution in the United States criminal justice system? This is a very subjective question which calls for opinions and doubts. Retribution operates under the belief that the criminal cannot be reformed or rehabilitated and that the punishment serves the purpose so that the criminal will not want to commit the crime again or in the first place. However, that does not always work. There will be no deterrent effect if the public considers the punishment to be discrimination or persecution. Rehabilitation should be most definitely be valued over retribution in the United States criminal justice system at least…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Harm Principle Law
    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Harm Principle Law

    We as humans may think that the punishment toward the criminal may fit the crime that they created. Principle laws, a society ultimately degenerates into despotism--the rule of the strong and violent over the weak and nonviolent. Harm Principle laws are essential, and every government on Earth has them. Some laws are based not strictly on harm or self-harm concerns, but also on promoting the personal morality of the law 's authors (Head, 2014). On a law standpoint, it is wrong to commit a crime against anyone regardless of their circumstances.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Criminal Sentencing In America
    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page

    Criminal Sentencing In America

    Criminal sentencing in America has long been guided by one of several different major philosophies of punishment, including retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation (Spohn, 2000). Retributive sentences involve punishments intended to exact revenge, in line with the biblical idea of “an eye for an eye.” This is based on the belief that some behaviors are unconditionally wrong and therefore justified of punishment. From this perspective, sentences should be equal with the harm done to society. Deterrence, on the other hand, involves a more practical basis for sentencing. It is based on the concept that crime is easily chosen as the result of a rational cost-benefit examination. Individuals will engage in crime when the benefits…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Punishment Of Crimes In America
    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Punishment Of Crimes In America

    The relationship between America's overall integrity or moral versus the extent of punishment on crime in America remains vague. Therefore, Americas ethical and moral principles and how they reflect the severeness of crime retribution in our country varies. If one was to consider the incarceration rate on minorities then it is undeniably arguable that America's morals are greatly reflective on our idea of rightful punishment on specific violations. However, if one was to financially consider how our morals reflect our degree of discipline on specific violations, a potentially contradictory argument is provoked.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Conservatism In America Analysis
    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Conservatism In America Analysis

    Action was made by the conservatives due to lack of response from the liberals and a demand for more patrol officers, stricter sentences and an increase in executions. Even though the Liberals were opposed to the idea of the harsh reality of penalty by death and the courts ruling in the mid 1970s that briefly dismissed it, eventually Capital Punishment became the resolve to protecting society against criminals. Zoll argues that it comes down to three significant factors that support the act of Capital Punishment; Deterrent argument, Retaliation Argument and Moral Indignation Argument. In contrast, the liberal punishment model emphasizes the rights of the accused, humane (not "cruel and unusual") punishment, and rehabilitation of those convicted of a crime. Conservatives and rightists belittle this model as "soft on crime." Liberals would argue that capital punishment is simply state sponsored and funded government murder. Liberals would further state that the killing of prisoners by Capital Punishment removes any chance of rehab and bettering our society. They believe the US spends more money on killing, the appeals, and keeping them housed in death row cells than we do keeping them alive. In the United States, the two opposing models compete in the realms of culture and public policy. For most of U.S. history, the harsher punishment model has been so dominant that it is part of their international image. They are the country where they "hang 'em high." Only in an exceptional period does the principle and practice of redemption gain the upper hand. While the liberal, humanistic vision of human nature is that people are basically good, but are made bad by oppressive poverty, abuse, addiction, racism, and/or lack of opportunity, the Right's view is that people are bad by nature. Though it proved to be thought provoking to…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Purpose Of Sentencing
    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Purpose Of Sentencing

    In the purpose of sentencing, there are four fundamental philosophies. Those are retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation. Retribution is the philosophy…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Retribution Vs Incarceration
    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Retribution Vs Incarceration

    “The only way that we’re going to feel secure in this country again and that we’re going to feel good about ourselves is if we use these systems we’ve put into place to create positive change around the world. I really believe we can do that”(John Perkins). Sentencing and corrections have changed over the years. Before, the criminal justice system believed prison sentences were the only way to rehabilitate criminals, when in fact, it did the exact opposite. The judicial system began to see that the solutions they applied were not beneficial to the inmates.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Punishment Vs Rehabilitation
    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Punishment Vs Rehabilitation

    In the 1700’s before there were correctional systems to incarcerate offenders, people were brutally beaten as a punishment until they became a little more humane and started putting them in jail to serve time as a punishment. In the early 1800’s the first real prison in the United States was available to put offenders away, this prison was called Philadelphia’s walnut street jail and this prison was viewed as the perfect opportunity for offenders to think about the crimes that they have committed and admit to what they have done. In the Mid 1800’s the Cherry Hill penitentiary was opened and this prison was said to be humane and gave the inmates the opportunity for rehabilitation.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    criminal justice fundamentals
    • 1280 Words
    • 5 Pages

    criminal justice fundamentals

    10. What are the 4 utilitarian justifications for punishment? Deterrence, incapacitation and rehabilitation and specific deterrence…

    • 1280 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Philosophies
    • 353 Words
    • 1 Page

    Sentencing Philosophies

    The four fundamental philosophies surrounding the purpose of sentencing are; retribution, this philosophy is the belief that those who commit criminal acts should be punished according to the seriousness of the crime and that no other circumstances are considered, deterrence, this strategy is the thought that if the punishment given is severe enough that it will stop the potential criminal from committing the crime or to be a repeat offender. Incapacitate is the third philosophy that is a belief that if the criminal is detained for a crime, thereby being separated from the community reduces the criminal activity and once released will not be as likely to be a repeat offender. Rehabilitation is the fourth and final philosophy that surrounds the purpose of sentencing, some believe that society is best served when those who break the law are not simply punished but are provided with resources needed to eliminate the need or want to engage in criminal…

    • 353 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics