Compare And Contrast Bertrand Russell Vs Aristotle

Aristotle: On Interpretation vs. Bertrand Russell: “On the Relations of Universals and Particulars”
In 384 B.C., Aristotle was born in the city of Stagira, Greece, and after the passing of his father Nicomachus, whom was king of Macedonia’s personal physician, at a young age, Proxenus of Atarneus became Aristole’s new guardian. Aristotle began school at Plato’s Academy in Athens when he was around 18 years old, and he studied there until he was about 37 years old, which was shortly after the time of Plato’s death. Aristotle’s writings covered an immense amount of subjects including logic, ethics, politics, metaphysics, biology, linguistics, and many more. After his departure from Plato’s Academy, he began tutoring Alexander the Great, and in turn, was announced as the head of the royal academy of Macedon. Soon after, in 335 B.C., Aristotle went back to Athens to form his own school, which was known as the Lyceum, where he spent his next 12 years teaching, researching, and writing. Then in 323 B.C., the anti-Macedonian government charged Aristotle with impiety shortly after the death of his former student Alexander the Great; therefore, Aristotle had to flee to Chalcis in order to avoid prosecution, and that is where he remained until his death in 322 B.C. Aristotle’s great works are grouped together in what is known as the Organon,
While Aristotle’s work seems to stretch over a variety of terms in order to better understand the entire logic argument he is making, Russell really only discusses the relationship between universals and particulars. I believe that Russell’s argument is more defensible because of it being founded in more modern times whereas the argument made by Aristotle was founded over more than two thousand years ago, and since then, there has been many advances in science, logic, and philosophy that seem to directly oppose