Preview

Clifford Insufficient Evidence

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
850 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Clifford Insufficient Evidence
What I'm here to discuss is some of the flaws in Clifford's principal in The Ethics of Belief. Clifford argues that it is always wrong to believe on insufficient evidence. He brings up a couple of premises. Premise 1 is that believing anything on insufficient evidence is always harmful to others. Premise 2 is that it is always wrong for anyone to believe anything on insufficient evidence. With the example of a shipowner, the shipowner believed strongly in his ship without sufficient evidence that it was ready for a voyage. However, because the ship sank and caused the death of the men on the ship he was in the wrong for believing in the soundness of the ship without enough evidence to support it. His decision harmed other men and thus supports …show more content…
I do believe that in most cases it is wrong to believe on something without gathering enough information and evidence on the subject matter. For example, if someone was murdered and the police arrested someone who was at the scene of the crime, it would be wrong to accuse him and believing this person committed the crime without investigating and looking for evidence that indicates he was the culprit. So, I agree with Clifford based on this example. However, it's not always the case where it is wrong to believe on insufficient evidence because sometimes you can't find evidence to support either side. We can't always use sufficient logic and evidence to decide an issue even though we may still believe in one thing or the other. For example, if a person was offered to be on board on a mission to explore space in search for a new colony, there is insufficient evidence to decide whether to go or not on this mission. It is high stakes, unique and irreversible making you unable to decide on any evidence even though you must choose to go or not to go. The decision to go or not only effects the person making the decision and does not harm another person. This contradicts Clifford's premise that believing on insufficient evidence is always harmful to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Collins’ first argument begins with the first premise that most people do not want to know the truth. Collins attempts to back this assertion by describing an instance…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Clifford (1879), there is an ethics to belief that makes it always wrong for anyone to believe anything on insufficient evidence. Clifford (1879) begins his paper by providing an illustrative analogy – one where a ship-owner is preparing to send to sea a ship filled with innocent men, women, and children. Prior to its departure, doubts had been brought to his attention regarding its condition and the possibility of a failure to complete the voyage. The ship-owner, now in a dilemma, successfully convinces himself that because the ship had weathered so many storms and successfully completed so many voyages, it was fit to believe that the ship was fit to sail. He acquired a sincere belief that the ship would successfully complete the voyage despite its apparent faults. Eventually, the ship sank.…

    • 2507 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    To use the example of the ship captain, believing the ship was seaworthy was in and of itself a morally blameworthy situation, whereas the belief in a tyrannosaurus rex is not in and of itself a morally blameworthy situation.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every time that the people ignores facts, they miss an opportunity to gain knowledge and become informed individuals which can then help the people be more involved in many different aspects of every day life. Our beliefs play a big role in the problem because depending on what the people thinks is right, that is what they would abide by, and anything that goes against those beliefs would be wrong in their point of view. Keohane argues “there is a substantial body of psychological research showing that people tend to interpret information with an eye toward reinforcing their preexisting views. If we believe something about the world, we are more likely to passively accept as truth any information that confirms our beliefs and actively dismiss information that doesn’t. ” We look at things differently depending on our beliefs.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his article “The Ethics of Belief (Clifford, 1877) W.K. Clifford sought to argue that “it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence” (as cited on p190). The aim of this essay is to establish whether indeed this view offered by Clifford, when considering religious faith, is convincing. In order to do this I will consider the arguments that Clifford put forward, including that which to believe anything based upon insufficient evidence always does harm and so is wrong. Such a statement is in direct opposition to those religious believers who regard their blind faith as a virtue and for whom evidence is something that is unnecessary in order to believe. Along with discussing Clifford I will detail the responses given by James who disagreed with Clifford and in response attacked his views within his own paper “The Will to Believe”. James believed instead that it is more important to achieve truth than to avoid error. Both men, in my opinion, offer strong and persuasive arguments however I do not believe that either stands without criticism, therefore throughout I will offer my own views on the foundations of their arguments, which I hope will establish, that although many of Clifford’s points are valid in particular and specific circumstances they do not offer, as proposed, a convincing view of religious faith.…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    If the question of right or wrong has to do with the origin of belief and whether or not one has the right to believe in the first place, then would the ship owner have been culpable had the doubts about the ship’s condition not been introduced? Is a person required to investigate EVERY doubt or question that is raised by another, which directly or indirectly impacts their belief? What if the source of doubt is unreliable? Without properly addressing these questions it is difficult to determine what the ship owner’s (or anyone else’s) responsibility was in the first place. This, I assert, is the fundamental problem with Clifford’s argument. To implicitly assume that one is guilty for simply believing without “sufficient” evidence can not be easily determined because the standards and thus the determination for “right” and “wrong” are too…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    William Dean Howells' short story "Editha" reveals his practice to judge human ethics and conduct logically. Editha also expose his trend to logically judge human behavior and values. This short story also fits philosopher Charles Sanders Peirce’s categorization of a person who believes out of persistence. These people believe what is straightforward, uncomplicated, and emotionally satisfying. They are hardly ever shaken in their beliefs. They will also reiterate their beliefs to themselves and look for supporting evidence – they will refuse and disapprove any facts which contradict their so called evidence.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Clifford assumed that even if no damage had come to the ship and travelers the owner would still have been ethically wrong as it is not the following action grounded on a faith that is incorrect but the holding of the faith in the first place. The belief was being kept even though the proof before him was not enough to keep that belief, instead he simply found the way to stifle his uncertainty. In this example Clifford’s opinion is, his choice not to completely examine and validate his belief by obtaining real evidence had the outcome of affecting the lives of several other people and families and at this point there can be no claim that the ship owner was ethically incorrect. Yet, Clifford maintains the view that there is no faith held, nevertheless trivial, that does not have an impact on the fate of manhood and that is why, the desire of success and subsistence of community, that his opinions are based. Clifford claims that what harms society is by manhood being naive and that the principal danger to society is that man’s naivety should lead him to stop analyzing and searching into things for to believe without proof would bring our society back into…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Knowledge is not the same as belief. Beliefs can be mistaken, but no-one can know what is false.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In many occasions, Juror Eight is forced to explain his reasoning behind his decisions chosen, many of which contradict the rest of the jurors. In one situation, the jurors discuss a piece of evidence where a women claims to have seen the murder occur through the window of the el train. Although most of the jurors find this story told to be true, Juror Eight sees another side. He says, “How can the woman be sure it was the kid when she saw it through the windows of a passing elevated train?”(Act 1, Page 19) Opposing the others, he uses his knowledge of the evidence in order to questions the other jurors’ thoughts. He also says, “How come you believed her? She’s one of them, too, isn’t she?” (Act 1, Page 19) In this quote, Juror Eight shows credibility and consideration to the fact that it may be possible that this woman was stretching the truth. At that point, his appeal to ethos causes some of the jurors to question the relevance in that piece of evidence. Not only is the goal of evidence remembered brought up, but so is the juror to juror relationship between Juror Eight and Juror Ten. This proves that by using ethos, the appeal to others is greater while persuading.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “The Ethics of Belief” written by W.K. Clifford. Explains the idea of belief and moral righteousness by coming up with the conclusion that it is morally incorrect to believe in a claim with insufficient evidence or to create a claim without sufficient evidence. Clifford brings about various analogies that prove his claim to be true such as the ship-owner and the religious group on the island. Although these ideas helped set out the theory efficiently, William James essay “The Will to Believe” believes in the opposite by stating that anyone can believe in anything without the sufficient evidence provided for a specific claim. James’s, the essay provides counterexamples to Clifford’s work as well as provides strong examples and positions to help…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bigfoot Research Paper

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages

    That argument is very logical hinting the repetitive phrase, “I’ll believe when I see it.” However, there are a lot of things that are not visible that we believe in. For example, in America 9 out of 10 Americans believe in God. God is not visible to us, so why don’t 9 out of 10 Americans believe in Bigfoot? Now in no way am I comparing the greatness of God to some creature in the woods, but when it comes to our belief in the things we cannot see, I feel as if we can treat certain things like we treat our belief in God. Also, in many science courses we learn about different things like carbon monoxide and air that we breathe that we can not see but we believe that those things contribute to our lives, so why not believe in something that we have not seen? Another argument that would challenge the theory of the existence of Bigfoot is that there is not any clear physical or visual evidence that proves Bigfoot is real. Well, a Bigfoot believer would quickly say, what on Earth can make an abnormally large footprint the size of 15 inches in the woods? That question more than likely cannot be answered without some deep thought and research and the question still may not be able to be answered. Also, throughout research and studies, a definite classification cannot be determined. If we can not conclude on the classification of Bigfoot, then of course proof will be…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Will to Believe

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In his essay, “The Will to Believe”, William James aims to provide a justification of faith. James wants to show that it is sometimes justifiable to hold beliefs that are not supported by sufficient evidence. Therefore, he presents various ideas which can influence a person’s beliefs. He believes that these influences are caused by our passion or our will.…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Convictions Paper

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the book Christian Excellence Alternative To Success written by Jon Johnston, he tells us that there are four pitfall concerning convictions that we have to be aware of:…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I personally do not agree with neither Clifford nor James completely. I believe that Clifford presents a better argument by saying that we need sufficient evidence for a belief, but I do not completely agree with this statement. There are many circumstances where the general population and myself are satisfied with believing without any sufficient evidence. One example of this is Santa Claus. For millions of children, including myself, who grew up in Christian homes, the myth of Santa Claus is one that requires no proof. Every child stays up on Christmas Eve hoping to hear reindeer on the roof in anticipation of Santa bringing Christmas presents. When children reach a certain age, usually in middle school, they begin hearing the rumors from…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays