Preview

Cleanthes: The Design Argument

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
481 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cleanthes: The Design Argument
The way I see the design argument explained by Cleanthes is how everything in the universe is designed. Meaning everything that is designed was designed by a creator. It didn’t just appear out of thin air. Something or someone made it become possible. Cleanthes also brings up the analogy that the earth resembles a machine. He explains how everything about the earth had to be put together perfectly in order for the earth to functions like it does. Just like how for machines to work, every small detail had to be perfectly thought through and perfectly designed. Machines would not function without a creator perfectly planning every part of it. An intelligent creator had to create the universe and every small detail of it for it to perfectly function. Cleanthes argument is well thought through but not sound. …show more content…
This is not a sound argument because he is clearly contradicting himself. God is supposed to be the designer of the universe. Only something extremely complex would be able to create the universe and Cleanthes says if things are complex then they were created and did not just appear. Taking from his own view, this means that God could not have just appeared and was created by another intelligent creator. Now, some people might say then that there is nothing else before God. God is the all-powerful intelligent being and nothing created him. But how could that be true based on Cleanthes’ argument? God could not just happen without any cause. It is impossible for him to appear out of thin air just like everything else in the universe and on Earth. God had to be created by a more powerful intelligent being. If God was created by an intelligent creator, then that means the creator that created God was also created and so on. There are infinitely more powerful creators creating each

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The design argument is an explanation used by theists to prove the existence of God. It is also called the teleological argument. The word teleological comes from the Greek word teleos which means ‘end’ or ‘purpose’. The argument uses observation of the natural world to provide evidence of design and uses this evidence to back up the existence of God as what has been designed needs a designer. As the argument uses evidence to confirm its theory of the universe being designed (as opposed to occurring by chance) it is classed as an a posteriori argument. The design argument provides a range of evidence to argue for the existence of a designer (i.e. God).…

    • 984 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One key feature of the design argument is the fact that it uses analogies in order to support and prove its conclusions. In all versions of the design argument the main idea is that because the world shows purpose god must exist, most philosophers who talk about the design argument use analogies in order to explain this idea. William Paley uses the watch and watch maker analogy in order to show this. Paley said that if we found a watch on a heath, we would assume that it has some designer as it clearly complex and built for a purpose, we could then therefore say the same of nature as everything in nature has a purpose for example trees having leaves to take energy for the sun to grow or predatory animals having sharp teeth to kill prey. Thomas Aquinas is another philosopher who used an analogy in order to show how god must exist as there is purpose in the world. Aquinas used the idea of a bow and arrow. He stated that when a bow is directed towards its purpose/target it is directed by an archer who is sending it in the right direction. Therefore, we can say that when we see things in nature which are moving towards are target they must also have some kind of driving force behind the directing them in the right way and that this force must be god. The use of analogies in the design argument makes it easier to follow and understand, however, the analogies have…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It seems that everything around us is some small cog in a large piece of clockwork that has been intricately designed for all aspects of the planet to coincide and work with each other. The main strengths of the teleological argument are that the conditions of the world are so perfect for us to live in that it must have been designed. Evidence is everywhere. One can use the William Paley's watchmaker theory in support. Which states that: if you're walking along the beach and find a watch you don't assume it’s there by accident. You know someone must have made it due to how intricate the interior and it showing evidence of design; this is the same with the world. One of the most obvious forms of design is the Fibonacci sequence which appears in nature repeatedly; the mathematical pattern can be seen in snail shells and petals of a plant. It seems like this formula was the template for the production of nature, it surely cannot be coincidence that it appears in so many different aspects?…

    • 1261 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all, intelligent design claims that intelligent causes are necessary to explain the complexity-rich structures of the life surrounding us and it harbors on the idea of irreducible complexity. Irreducible complexity states how a single system is composed of several well-matched interacting parts that contribute to a basic function, and removal of any one of the parts causes the system to not work properly. Believers of intelligent design think that some biological aspects are too complicated to have evolved on their…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Keller rebukes this by quoting Francis Collins in his book The Language of God, saying “the very fact that the universe had a beginning implies that someone was able to begin it.” (133). This statement captures perfectly one of the fatal flaws in the Big Bang theory; something outside of nature had to create nature itself. How more perfectly can one describe the person of God?! God not only fits this description, but it parallels John 1:3 when John says that “all things were made through Him, and without him was not anything made that was made” (ESV).…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stephen Hawking, one of the World’s leading scientists, released a new book in 2010 called, ‘The Grand Design.’ He and his co-author, Leonard Mlodinow, stated that, ‘you don’t need God to create the universe because the laws of gravity and a certain version of quantum physics suffice to make it inevitable that the universe will create itself, out of nothing, in an infinite variety of forms; and given an infinite variety of forms, a segment or sub-universe friendly to mankind is bound to develop, no design needed, grand or not.’ He also later on in the book writes that, ‘spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the Universe exists, why we exist. It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the Universe going.’ Both of these quotes are strong evidence that the universe is an accidental one, and there is no such thing as a creator or a created universe.…

    • 677 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They break down their argument into three different components, “Some contingent beings exist. If any contingent beings exist, then a necessary being must exist. Therefore there exists a necessary being” (Pg. 70). They explain that an infinite series is evidence to prove the contingent being exists. This presents an idea that there is no final explanation to this cause. To argue the statement by some atheist that claim that the world has always existed, they say that they do not make any claims about how old the universe which explains a universe that may have always…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    McCloskey goes on to make another proclamation that in order to prove the Teleological Argument irrefutable examples of design and purpose must be presented. The major issue with his assessment is the standards he sets to defend the argument is one he can’t even live up to. Based on McCloskey accusations he implies that evolution dismisses the need for a perfect designer. It is definitely not reasonable for him to require indisputable examples, when his belief in atheism does not require one. If McCloskey was to require theism to present indisputable examples, then it is only right that he provide indisputable evidence for the arguments of atheism, which can’t be…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To him, if anything that has parts organized to serve a purpose is designed, and nature contains things which have parts that are organized to serve a purpose, nature certainly is designed. Consequently, assuming that nature was designed by a mind that is distinct from nature, such mind, or a higher being,…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout his argument it seems that he focuses primarily on the existence of evil to support his non belief in God. He started off immediately in this argument by stating that because of the evil that exists in this world that if we are to say there was a creator he was either a "malevolent powerful being or a well-intentioned muddler." [1] He automatically places the blame of evil on a creator if one exists. However, I have to ask myself if a creator does not exist where did evil come from, what is the cause…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The example of the apple that was discussed in class is a good example of this claim. A person can understand that an apple contains seeds which can grow into an apple tree. The tree can then produce apples, continuing the cycle of causes for the creation of the apple. The fact that this cycle can be thought to go on for a long time, but the cause of the first apple had to start at some point. By this observation, a person can determine on their own that whatever created the first apple or apple seed is greater than what created it, what caused it is what is considered God.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The design argument is concerned to find the meaning or purpose in this world; they seek to move from facts about the world to God. Like the cosmological argument, the design argument draws back to arguments put forward by Socrates and Plato who said that ‘the human body, with all its principles and elements must owe its origin…of Zeus’. The design argument considers a number of issues for example; why is the universe the way that it is? As expected, it has undergone many different transformations that have transformed it into a theistic argument (on that seeks to prove the existence of the God of classical theism). It suggests that certain aspects in the universe are…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Teleological Argument recognizes the various complex aspects of the Earth, nature, and life and attributes these complexities to a designer. The most common analogy depicting this argument is described through a watch. A watch represents intricate and meticulous designing that couldn’t have just been formed accidentally. This analogy can be interpreted relating to the universe. The greater the design, the greater the designer. Much like the watch, there are various “natural” processes and events that happen in the world that could not have just happened coincidentally as it appears to have been the result of meticulous designing, there had to be someone or something that engineered it all and that being can be rationally reasoned to be God through the Teleological Argument as it implies intelligent design. There is no way that Earth is already fine-tuned to support the complexity of living organisms and life because there are so many qualities that characterize them; it had to be planned, intentional and caused by someone or…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Philosophy 201 Theism

    • 1719 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As I mentioned in the paragraph above, the existence of the world does prove that a being had to create the objects in our universe. I suppose in the reading McCloskey is right in that the mere proof of objects existence does not give us the right to claim an all-powerful, all perfect being created these objects. What I do believe is given this knowledge why would one not want to further educate yourself on this conclusion and open your eyes to the idea of “god”…

    • 1719 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The cosmological argument proves the existence of God. It discusses contingent beings which exist, but could not have existed and necessary beings which exist and could not not exist. The cosmological says that there is a contingent being that exists. The existence of a contingent being must have a cause and the contingent being cannot be the cause of itself. The complete cause of a contingent being includes only other contingent beings or it includes a necessary being. Contingent beings alone cannot be the complete cause of a contingent being. The complete cause of a contingent being must include a necessary being. Therefore, a necessary being must exist. The cosmological argument shows that there must be a higher power, and that higher power is God. Everything that exists on earth is a contingent being. There is no person or animal that is not contingent. But what created everything to begin with if a contingent being cannot be the only cause of another contingent being? Everything on earth has a cause, but there must be a necessary being being that caused the Earth. There has to be something other than contingent beings. There has to be a necessary being that started everything. That necessary being is…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays