Preview

An Accidental Universe is As Likely As a Created One. Discuss

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
677 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
An Accidental Universe is As Likely As a Created One. Discuss
‘An accidental universe is as likely as a created one.’ Discuss

Stephen Hawking, one of the World’s leading scientists, released a new book in 2010 called, ‘The Grand Design.’ He and his co-author, Leonard Mlodinow, stated that, ‘you don’t need God to create the universe because the laws of gravity and a certain version of quantum physics suffice to make it inevitable that the universe will create itself, out of nothing, in an infinite variety of forms; and given an infinite variety of forms, a segment or sub-universe friendly to mankind is bound to develop, no design needed, grand or not.’ He also later on in the book writes that, ‘spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the Universe exists, why we exist. It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the Universe going.’ Both of these quotes are strong evidence that the universe is an accidental one, and there is no such thing as a creator or a created universe.
A strength of this is it completely rules out God, so therefore rules out any questions like, ‘How did God come about’ or ‘Why do we have the problem of evil if God exists.’ If God or any other creator doesn’t exist, then it becomes much simpler and rules out lots of unanswerable questions.
A weakness of this is that it doesn’t really explain how the universe was created accidentally. It just states that it has something to do with the laws of gravity and quantum physics as if they are a given. Quantum physics, itself, is still a hypothesis so cannot be proven itself, let alone prove something else. So, although Hawking makes it obvious that he believes that the universe is accidental, he doesn’t have clear scientific evidence to prove this.
Overall I think that the an accidental universe is not as likely as a created one, as the world is just to finite in detail and perfect to be a fluke.
The creation of the World was just too prefect that it couldn’t of happened by accident. By agreeing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    He explains how everything about the earth had to be put together perfectly in order for the earth to functions like it does. Just like how for machines to work, every small detail had to be perfectly thought through and perfectly designed. Machines would not function without a creator perfectly planning every part of it. An intelligent creator had to create the universe and every small detail of it for it to perfectly function. Cleanthes argument is well thought through but not sound.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Let us assume that it is true to say that there is a clear existence of purpose and design in nature, the question is whether or not the existence of purpose and design implies the existence of God. The design that is apparent in the world can certainly be shown not to be the work of God, or at least God as an omnipotent (he can do anything), omniscient (he knows everything), omnipresent (He is everywhere) being.…

    • 1261 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    not. And I believe that we can’t create anything because we are only discovering what the god (creator)…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    They break down their argument into three different components, “Some contingent beings exist. If any contingent beings exist, then a necessary being must exist. Therefore there exists a necessary being” (Pg. 70). They explain that an infinite series is evidence to prove the contingent being exists. This presents an idea that there is no final explanation to this cause. To argue the statement by some atheist that claim that the world has always existed, they say that they do not make any claims about how old the universe which explains a universe that may have always…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Życiński, J. (1996). Metaphysics and Epistemology in Stephen Hawking 's Theory of the Creation of the Universe. Zygon, 31(2), 269-284…

    • 883 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Astronomers combine mathematical models with observations to develop workable theories of how the universe was made. Albert Einstein’s General theory of relativity along with standard theories of fundamental particles. NASA’s spacecraft the Hubble Space Telescope and the Spitzer Space Telescope continue measuring the expansion of the universe. One of the goals are to figure out if the universe will expand forever or will it stop, turn around, and collapse in a “Big Crunch.” If we were to look at the universe one second after the Big Bang, what we would see is a 10 billion degree sea of neutrons, protons, electrons, anti-electrons, photons, and neutrinos. Then as time passes we would…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Into the Universe with Stephen Hawking,” Hawking discusses his vision of the universe and it’s ability to exist. In the episode, Hawking shares his knowledge on how the universe came into existence and how it managed to become what it is today. Hawking also shares the evidence that scientists, such as himself, have collected through the years.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Whatever has the possibility of non existence, yet exists, has been caused to exist. Something cannot bring itself into existence, since it must exist to bring itself into existence, which is illogical.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The universe was created from our God; he created this universe with a purpose filled life (Lecture, 3). The universe has been designed to be for human habitat for all life God…

    • 1071 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Teleological Argument

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This is the most recent development of the teleological argument known as the anthropic principle. The argument claims it is well known that our existence in this universe relied heavily on variables remaining constant and proposes that even the slightest change in the composition of matter would have made the world unfit for humans to develop. The extraordinary probability that all these variables were aligned so perfectly in our favour tells scientists that it is unlikely to have happened by mere chance, but there must be the existence of a designer that has fine-tuned the universe for our existence to cater for our specific needs. This principle was developed by F.R Tennant who supported the existence of a divine designer. He believed that it would be possible to imagine a disorganised world in which no rules applied.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Christianity trends

    • 933 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This fact may present a challange for modern sceince because this is not a scientific theory as it cannot be experimentally verified or falsified. Once we move into metaphysics the naturalistic assumption of science must be done away with as it is no longer either justifiable or useful. Indeed it is a metaphysical statement itself--as it lies behind science, it cannot be examined scientifically.…

    • 933 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I believe the second." Hawking adds, "Because there is a law such as gravity, the Universe can and will create itself from nothing." Graham Farmello of the Telegraph writes, "God did not create the universe, Stephen Hawking revealed."[55][56]…

    • 4060 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Accidental Universe

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I feel if the multiverse theory is proven to be more then a theory, it would further discredit religion as the reason for life to exist. On the other hand, I feel it is equally as possible for any of the religious views to be the reason why life exists. To me both seem equally as farfetched; I personally do not feel that the scientific universe we live in cares about life. We are such a small blip on the universal scale and even smaller if there is multiple universes. Because of this who, is to say that there was not a Creator or God who manipulates the parameters of the universe to create life. As I personally believe that there is an after life and a heaven I cannot discredit the idea of a creator. But I also cannot ignore science I would love to find out the truth of where we come from but I feel we are as close now as we were when religion was first thought of.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people either don’t know what the Big Bang is or misinterpret it greatly. To summarize it, the Big Bang is not the theory of how our Universe was “created” it is the theory of how it expanded or “inflated” into what our Universe looks like today. The theory explains that our Universe was once a singularity (which is located in the center of a black hole) that “sprang” into existence about 13.7 billion years ago. After this extremely hot, extremely small, and extremely dense Universe appeared without reasoning it then inflated and cooled into the Universe we know today (“Big Bang Theory”).…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stephen Hawking

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A field of study that Stephen Hawking is known for is cosmology. Cosmology is the metaphysical study of the origin and nature of the universe. A brief synopsis of Hawking indicates that, according to Hawking, "there is 'no place for a creator', that God does not exist." In his quantum cosmology, he indicates, "there would be no singularities at which the laws of science broke down and no edge of space-time at which one would have to appeal to God or some new law to set the boundary conditions for space-time . . . The universe would be completely self-contained and not affected by anything outside itself. It would neither be created nor destroyed. It would just BE . . . What place, then, for a creator?"(Smith 2005)Theists have argued against this position, specifically, "that even if Hawking's physical laws are true, that fact does not entail that the God of classical theism does not exist or even disconfirm the classical theistic hypothesis." It would appear that Hawking did not inhibit himself to simply one theory when asking the question where did we come from and why. Rather, he points out that "if we do discover a complete theory, it should in time be understandable in broad principle by everyone, not just a few scientists. Then we shall all, philosophers, scientists, and just ordinary people, be able to take part in the discussion of the question of why it is that we and the…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays