Preview

Clausewitz Applicability to Non-State Actors

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1386 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Clausewitz Applicability to Non-State Actors
Clausewitz’s theories on war are still relevant today with the revisualization of non-state actors on the world scene. The purpose of this essay is to expand on the applicability of these theories in today’s modern warfare where non-state actors play a larger, more global role. The study of theory, especially translated theory, requires an open mind to determine its applicability to various and ever-changing situations. In the case of Clausewitz, many strategists do not view his theories as relevant to today’s wars involving a Nation State vs. non-state actors. This is not true. The U.S. Army Command and General Staff College teaches that the commander’s intent is the most important part of proper execution. Strategists need to look at the intent of Clausewitz and view within the contextual historic period he wrote it, to demonstrate its relevance today. For the purpose of this essay, a Nation States is a sovereign territory that combines a political and geopolitical entity with a cultural or ethnic entity that was arrived at by self-determination. Non-state actors are groups that operate beyond state control and generally include rebel opposition groups (groups with a stated incompatibly with the government, generally concerning the control of government or the control of territory), local militias and warlords. By reviewing Clausewitz’s definitions of war, his theory of “the remarkable trinity” and the historical examples of non-state actors’ involvement with Nation States in war the relevance of Clausewitz will be apparent. Non-state actors have played a part in wars or have been an opposing force since before the time of Clausewitz. The first example of non-state actors’ involvement in a war comes from the Bible. The founding of Israel is rooted in non-state actors, led by Moses, waging an insurgency against Egypt; resulting in the formation of the first Jewish state. Since the rebirth of Israel after World War II the reverse of this has


Bibliography: Bassford, Christopher. Policy, Politics, War and Military Strategy. 2006. online at http://www.clausewitz.com. Accessed 12 September 2007. Bassford, Christopher. Tip-Toe Through the Trinity (Working Draft). March 2005. online at http://www.calusewitz.com. Accessed 12 September 2007. Clausewitz, Carl von. On War. Edited and translated by Michael Howard and Peter Paret. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976. Echevarria, Antulio J. “War, Politics, and RMA – The Legacy of Clausewitz.” Joint Forces Quarterly (Winter 1995-1996); 76-80. Paret, Peter. “Clausewitz.” In Makers of Modern Strategy, 186-213. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    These are Soldiers with special training that perform medical duties when they come into contact with the enemy.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The essays by Ambrose, Broyles, Hedges, Kudo, and Styron collectively discuss War in varying contexts, highlighting the effects both before and after war. Some articles intersect on the supporting the idea of another, while others clearly hold opposing views.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karspersen, L.B. 2003, The Fission Theory Of The State. In: 'The Warfare Paradigm ' In Historical Sociology: Warfare As A Driving Historical Force, Research Networks No. 21 Social Theory at the 6th ESA Conference, Murcia, Spain. September 23-26, 2003. pp.26-29…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the book, he has challenged preconceived notions that have made his book persuasive about the necessity of studying war, so as to go into greater detail about the debates that he has introduced the reader to. One such example is that ‘war is bad’. One might think, especially in context to liberals that wars should not be fought and nations should resolve all their disputes peacefully through arbitration. Howard has presented examples of when it is essential to fight in a war, for example when war is necessary for freedom. Another example is of liberal visionaries like the Italian, Mazzini, whose ideas of peace could manifest through what he thought to be a just war. In this case it had to be war to get rid of their oppressive Austrian rulers.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Clausewitz's Theory Of War

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages

    While many scholars attempted to theorize war in human history, only few were credited for constructing consistent theories on which people could base and further their understanding of war and warfare. Those include Greek Thucydides, Chinese Sun Tzu, and Indian Kautilya all three from 3-4th century BC; Prussian Carl von Clausewitz and Swiss Antoine-Henry Jomini both from 19th century. All of those prominent theorist had a lot to offer and therefore had great influence on our thinking in war, warfare, and strategy. However, Clausewitz’s theory offers more insight if one carefully and purposely studied the “paradoxical trinity” identified in his…

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this chapter, Walzer discusses the cruelty of war and whether there can be any justification for such cruelty. He begins by distinguishing between the justice of war (jus ad bellum) and the justice in war (jus in bello). "War is always judged twice, first with reference to the reasons states have for fighting, secondly with reference to the means they adopt." (p.21).…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today's world and society, war is often the last source of solution for perseverance and safekeeping of a democracy’s interests, while on the other…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The issue of winning wars and defining victory is an issue Emile Simpson analyzes in her article “Why We Failed to Win a Decisive Victory in Afghanistan”. Simpson begins the article by defining what Western militaries consider victory by quoting Clausewitz, stating “we must render the enemy powerless: and that, in theory, is the…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Military theory spans centuries of conflict all across the world. As such, military theorists have written in a variety of military climates, varying from the absence of gun powder to the presence of nuclear weapons. However, some military theories are transcendent. Some elements of Sun Tzu and Clausewitz are eternally wise. While their similarities may become universal truths, their differences are equally worthy of study because, it is in the differences where choices are made. Sun Tzu and Clausewitz agreed that war is chaos, military action is a tool for diplomatic goals and, as such, the results of warfare are not final. Their differences lie in how they advocate for waging war. The style and preparations for war contrast. This is where…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    State Level Society

    • 2584 Words
    • 11 Pages

    “Though warfare is surely a prime mover in the origin of the state,” Carneiro argues, “it cannot be the only factor.”2 Carneiro contends that war is…

    • 2584 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Phillips, Rachel. "Counterpoint: ‘Enemy Combatant’ Is an Illegitimate Exercise of Uncontrolled Power." Points of View (2011). Ebscohost.com. Points of View, 23 June 2011. Web. 21 May 2012.…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli Thesis

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I have done numerous accounts of research, most importantly by reading the art of war written by Machiavelli. This book consists of answering the first question of who influenced him.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cian O’Driscoll, author of the article Re-negotiation the Just War: the Invasion of Iraq and Punitive War, explains how the arguments of punitive war, or wars of punishment, from both Presidents George Bush and Tony Blair relate to the justification of going to war with Iraq in 2003. O’Driscoll, after explaining the justification of both presidents then relates these justifications to jus ad bellum, a Latin term which constitutes a more moral lethal question, when is it “just” or legitimate to go to war? Jus ad bellum is part of just war theory, which over the years has gained two different entities, contemporary just war theory, or in plainer terms the older traditional way of justifying punitive wars. The second is conventional just war theory, the way we justify punitive wars as of right now. O’Driscoll uses Bush and Blair’s argument in justifying the punitive Iraq war with conventional just war theory, O’Driscoll then relates this conventional justification to how contemporary war was justified back in the days. O’Driscoll is comparing contemporary and conventional just war theory, saying that although there are differences among the two, contemporary just war theory still has influence on conventional just war theory and punitive wars.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the time of the Nazis there was pain and hurt everywhere. The Nazis destroyed the life of Jews like Anne Frank. There is conflict everywhere in life. Everyday more problems arise and even more pain is caused. In life humans start conflicts, in fiction there are conflicts, and throughout history there always has been conflicts. When there is conflict, the best thing to do is stay strong and positive.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays