Classical Criminology & Positivism
Classical criminology was established in the mid-eighteenth century and came to the forefront by the theories of Cesare Beccaria. Beccaria based his theories on a philosophy known as utilitarianism, which assumes that human actions are governed by whether they bring pleasure or pain. Utilitarianism emphasized that, the relationship between crimes and their punishment should be balanced and that behavior must be useful, purposeful and reasonable. From this evaluation, Beccaria and other classic criminologists believed that crime is a rational choice that could be controlled by criminal punishments. Classical criminology theory established several basic elements. (1) People in society have free will to choose criminal or conventional solutions to meet their needs or settle their problems. (2) Criminal solutions may be more attractive than conventional ones because they usually require less work for greater payoff. (3) A person’s choice of criminal solutions may be controlled by fear of society’s reaction to such acts. (4) The more severe, certain and swift the reaction, the better it can control criminal behavior. (5) The most efficient crime prevention device is punishment sufficient to make crime an unattractive choice. As a result of these early findings in classical criminology the choice theory or rational choice theory emerged unquestioned until the rise of positivism and criminology came together in the nineteenth century.
Positivism challenged the classical theories of criminology and suggested that crime can be related to social conditions of the offenders. Positivists based their beliefs on two main elements. (1) Human behavior is a function of external forces that are beyond individual control. (2) The scientific method was key to solving problems. With these theories of sociology in mind, sociological criminology came to light with the work of Adolphe Quetlet. Quetlet began to look at the social...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document