Patricia Murphy, in her essay, “Reevaluating Female “Inferiority”: Sarah Grand versus Charles Darwin,” states that “by linking a perceived mental inferiority of women to the mechanism of evolution, Darwin seemingly brought scientific proof to support a cultural truism” which generated “significant repercussions (221).” Later texts such as […] and […] suggest that sex differences are not as meaningful as they have been portrayed by Darwin and Gamble. Darwin’s ideology of gender is reflective of Victorian ideologies at the time Descent of Man was written. The prevailing view was a dichotomous standard that put men and women on opposite sides of the spectrum due to “essential” characteristics, which contributes to and enforces the existing social
Patricia Murphy, in her essay, “Reevaluating Female “Inferiority”: Sarah Grand versus Charles Darwin,” states that “by linking a perceived mental inferiority of women to the mechanism of evolution, Darwin seemingly brought scientific proof to support a cultural truism” which generated “significant repercussions (221).” Later texts such as […] and […] suggest that sex differences are not as meaningful as they have been portrayed by Darwin and Gamble. Darwin’s ideology of gender is reflective of Victorian ideologies at the time Descent of Man was written. The prevailing view was a dichotomous standard that put men and women on opposite sides of the spectrum due to “essential” characteristics, which contributes to and enforces the existing social