Preview

Capital Punishment: Society's Self-Defense By Amber Young

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
641 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Capital Punishment: Society's Self-Defense By Amber Young
In her essay “Capital Punishment: Society’s Self-Defense,” Amber Young discusses the death penalty. In the beginning, the author talks about the infamous case of Ted Bundy. He was a serial killer who took it upon himself to kidnap, rape, and kill many innocent young women. She expresses that the criminal justice system failed to keep the young women safe from Bundy. She declares in her thesis that, “Capital punishment is society’s means of self-defense.” Next, the author states some oppositional stances and rebuts those. She then makes the claim that, “We base our approval or disapproval of capital punishment on fundamental values relating to life itself, rather than on statistics of factual evidence.” Amber Young holds her stance firm throughout her entire essay. …show more content…
She wants the reader to be emotionally involved with her essay, in order for them to have empathy for the victims. She talks about the one of the victims, Georgeann, with great detail. Young describes her as a pretty college student, in the middle of finals week, who was lively and vivacious. When talking about the aftermath, she uses vivid language and imagery. She writes, “Her bashed skull and broken body were dumped on a hillside many miles away…” When Bundy was caught his, “bashing bar” and other “homemade tools of torture” were found. The author hopes that by emphasizing these details, the reader will be more likely to feel sorry for the victim and want the worst punishment for the killer. It is her way of persuading the reader to believe in what she

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Koch

    • 533 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In his essay, the author includes seven main arguments opposing capital punishment and refutes them. People may find that the death penalty is a barbaric act and Koch argues this point by suggesting that the method of lethal injection is actually quite humane and literally painless. He also argues that although no other democratic country imposes the death penalty as a form of punishment, no other country boasts a murder rate as high as the United States. The author contends with those who believe capital punishment diminishes life’s value by suggesting the contrary. He has found those who are sentenced to death have been judged fairly and with a great deal of examination. Koch then refutes the argument of capital punishment as a state-sanctioned murder by acknowledging that the state holds much different rights and responsibilities than the individual.…

    • 533 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Capital Punishment is a moral controversy in today’s society. It is the judicial execution of criminals judged guilty of capital offenses by the state, or in other words, the death penalty. The first established death penalty laws can date back to the Eighteenth Century B.C. and the ethical debates towards this issue have existed just as long. There is a constant pro-con debate about this issue, and philosophers like Aristotle and Mill have their own take on this controversy as well. Aristotle is against capital punishment, while Mill believes it is morally permissible.…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is a major topic for debate Shannon Rafferty defends in her portfolio published by Penn State entitled “Death Penalty Persuasive Essay.” She believes the penalty should be allowed because it functions as a deterrent, it provides society retribution and it is morally just. Olivia H. disagrees with use of the death penalty in her essay “Capital Punishment Is Dead wrong.” She tells about the risk of punishing the innocent, and how the states are doing irreversible acts of crime. As the authors disagree about whether the death penalty should be allowed, they have some common ground when it comes to admitting the potential for human error and in both disagreeing to the use of barbaric punishments by the government.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In his essay Death and Justice, Edward Koch argues in support of capital punishment, he believes it is just and it saves lives. He successfully delivers an argument laced with true and vivid examples of unforgettable murderous events. His intended audience consists of the opposing voters and readers of the New Republic, the political magazine that published his essay. Prior to reading Edward Koch’s essay I was sure that I would disagree but it became clear to me that he is right. There are seven commonly held views against the death penalty that Koch argues against in his essay. In what follows I discuss a few of his arguments and show that the death penalty is the most viable approach to deal with convicted murderers.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When understanding criminal law it is important to consider the positive and negative effects that different punishment alternatives can have. Over the last century the use of capital punishment, the legal process for which an individual is sentence to death when found guilty of committing a crime, has been a subject debated back and forth between government parties on its effectiveness. Many people believe that the issues of fairness, constitutionality, morality of an individual’s life, and potential of convicting the innocent are too important to allow the use of the…

    • 2611 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    If we examine some arguments presented from both sides, opponents of the capital punishment claim that executing someone is nothing more than an immoral, state-authorized killing which undervalues the human life and destroys our respect for our government which itself says that killing is wrong. But the supporters of the death penalty think that certain murderers do deserve nothing less than a death for themselves and that although everyone is born with the right to live, criminals lose these rights at the moment when they take away the rights of another human and only by punishing them in such way, the society is affirming the value which is placed on the victim’s right to live.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    It’s so hard to say where I stand with the death penalty. There are those moments when a person commits a crime so heinous you’re in that state of mind of wanting the death penalty for them. But then you realize this is a human being. I truly do not believe in the death penalty. To me, I think executing someone for a various form of wrongdoing would not punish them. Instead I think that’s just taking them out of their misery. The punishment for doing something wrong that is, for that the person committing such an act, should not be killed but put through suffering by living in jail for the rest of their life. It’s tough, and honestly people have their opinions and it’s in their right to go with or without the death penalty. Capital punishment is one of life 's topics that leave many divided opinions due to its risqué nature. It has been a subject full of controversy for centuries and still continues to be discussed to this day. Throughout my piece I will explain the case that is pro Capital Punishment, as well as the contrasting side - the opposition.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Does killing ever justify murder? Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is the act of killing criminals for heinous acts that they’ve committed, generally homicide. I believe that capital punishment is a social injustice because it is unconstitutional and unethical. Those against capital punishment question the surety of the offender’s guilt, economic costs, and the supposedly unbiased judges. There are two sides to every coin though, and there are many reasons to support capital punishment as well. Those who agree with capital punishment argue that it dissuades others from attempting similar crimes and is a fair retribution for lives lost. Of all the varied topics included when discussing capital punishment, one of the most frightening to think about is the possibility that the wrong man may have died.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States of America is one of the only democratic countries that still use capital punishment. This has raised a rather extensive debate, especially over the last 4 decades. I became interested in this issue in 2011 after the controversy surrounding the execution of Troy Davis, and the issue has remained. In my research, one argument in favor of the use of capital punishment has always stood out as the most solid: that it serves as a crime deterrent and will save more lives than we kill. On the other hand, people from the opposing side state that if the death penalty really did act as a deterrent, states that implement it should have much lower murder rates than states that do not, and that is simply not the case.…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A lot of heat and controversy surrounds capital punishment in today’s society. The death penalty was built into the Texas justice system in 1835 and has retained most of its strength compared to the rest of the states. The famous motto “Don’t Mess with Texas” stands true when concerning the death penalty; In Kenneth William’s article, “Texas: Tough on Murderers or on Fairness?.” Williams states, “No one promotes this message [Don’t Mess with Texas] more than Texas prosecutors with their use of the death penalty. While the nation as a whole has become somewhat ambivalent about capital punishment, Texas prosecutors continue to seek death sentences on a regular basis, and the state carries out more executions than any other.” With this bold statement about capital punishment in Texas, Scott Vollum, Dennis R Longmire and Jacqueline Buffington-Vollum in their article, “Confidence in the Death Penalty and Support for its Use: Exploring the Value –Expressive Dimension of Death Penalty Attitudes”, found that “Surprisingly, in spite of the overwhelming support for the death penalty, 64% of respondents supported a moratorium and 48% indicated little or no confidence in the death penalty system.” Morgan Renyolds argues in her article, “The Death Penalty: Fair and Effective in Texas” that “All murders are not the same event. Executions are saved for the worst and serve obvious utilitarian ends.” She states that the death penalty is only used in the most severe cases and is necessary to deter crime. With Texas seemingly at odds with the rest of the nation concerning the issue of the death penalty, I will discuss the effects of the death penalty in Texas and explore if it has produced positive results in diminishing crime.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recently, there has been talk amongst many Americans about whether or not the “death penalty” should be outlawed in the United States. Although the crime may be unforgivable, no one should have the right to decide whether or not a person’s life should be stripped away, because nothing is more important than a person’s life. There are many reasons why the death penalty should be outlawed, one reason is that many criminals put on trial may face discrimination, and receive a bias punishment. Another reason is that the death penalty is very costly and that the alternative, life without parole, is a much cheaper and easier solution. The death penalty also reflects the moral standing of today's society. Nobody can justify taking another person’s…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Americans have for a long time been in favor of capital punishment for convicted murderers. In a 1981 Gallup Poll, two-thirds of Americans spoke their opinion for the Death Penalty (Radelet, Akers, 1996). These polls have determined that most Americans are very clear about the issue that the Death Penalty is justified punishment for murder. The justification suggests that murderers should be executed for the killing alone, murderers should suffer, and just…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital punishment has been a part of our justice system since the beginning. For many years the controversy of the death penalty has created social issues that question the validity and fairness based on concerns of moral and human rights. Even though many other nations use this form of justice, the fact that the United States views itself as a leader of human rights brings question to whether we are practicing what we preach. Nevertheless, the majority of US citizens are in support of the death penalty but does that make it rational? In the following paragraphs I will discuss my opinions on capital punishment and talk about issues concerning the death penalty as a deterrent to crime, should it be abolished and whether should youths convicted of violent crimes receive the death penalty. I will also explain how the irony of capital punishment makes it an issue of ethics having that both sides of this issue have valid positions that will keep the idea that as long as there is crime, capital punishment is here to stay whether we like it or not.…

    • 2209 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bedau, Hugo A. (2004). Killing As Punishment: Reflections on the Death Penalty in America. Boston, MA, USA: Northeastern University Press.…

    • 2399 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "State by State Database." Death Penalty Information Center. Death Penalty Information Center, 2012. Web. 10 May 2012.…

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays