Preview

capital punishment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
860 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
capital punishment
Capital Punishment Someone who believes that capital punishment is immoral or is completely against it, until he or she look at certain cases, people are quick to say, “Put them to death”. The public often contradicts their opinions when the discussion of capital punishment arises. Adding on to what Jeff Lindsay stated, most people often say that capital punishment is inhumane, yet when a ‘special’ case arises their stance changes; but only for that particular case. Of course there are many pros and cons associated with capital punishment, but I, for one, stand on the pro side. The use of capital punishment acts as a deterrent for crime, a way to be more economically efficient for taxpayers, and to suffice the idea that life in prison is too lenient.
If murderers’ and rapists’ brains work, the way non criminals’ brains work he or she could be deterred…just like the rest of us. Someone who kills people is not likely to be very sensible. It is my belief that someone who commits murder cannot be deterred by the law or its punishments. He/she who has committed murder is not likely to care about the consequences of their actions. Capital punishment is a deterrent for people who can actually respect the criminal justice system. Non criminals would much rather spend life in prison, than spend a few years in a prison knowing the day he or she is going to die is approaching soon, but non criminals are not going to murder or rape anyone any time soon. When someone commits murder he or she is not likely to be thinking about anything, let alone thinking about the punishment they are going to receive. Deterrent can only be achieved if criminals’ thought processes were the same as non-criminals’. Capital punishment prevents people who actually respect the law, from breaking the law. A murderer could be liable to murder again, even after he or she has been incarcerated, so why put he or she in a prison, where said inmate could have the opportunity to kill yet

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Fear of the death penalty will keep potential murderers from committing the crime. Capital punishment is immoral because of the kind of killing it is, rather than because it is a kind of killing in a simpler degree. If capital punishment is used, it must be used every time. It is imperative that the death penalty must be enforced in every case, or not at all. The morality of the death penalty is not the result of executing a prisoner; it is the obligations of the person doing the execution. Morality is defined at “the principles of right or wrong.” Even if the death penalty deterred crime more successfully than life imprisonment, that doesn’t necessarily mean it would be justified. Capital punishment permanently removes the worst criminals from society and should prove much safer for the rest of us than long term or permanent incarceration. It is self evident that dead criminals cannot commit any further crimes, either within prison or after escaping or after being released from…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the leading topics of debate concerning the issue of capital punishment is whether capital punishment existing deters criminals from committing serious and violent crimes such as homicides and sexual assault. This paper explores the findings and thought processes of some of the leading criminologists in the World and their interpretation of statistical data of homicide incidence rates. As I am exploring similar research in my paper, their findings can help me develop my own opinion on whether capital punishment is an effective and powerful enough deterrent to negate violent criminal activity or whether it would be prudent to avoid capital punishment altogether and follow an incarceration model such as that employed within Canada.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. Furthermore, both proponents and opponents argue over crucial aspects about Capital Punishment like deterrence, morality and retribution, incapacitation and rehabilitation, the cost, and the potential risk of executing an innocent person. Capital Punishment, according to proponents, deters potential murderers because they will fear receiving the death penalty themselves. According to Jennifer C. Honeyman and James R. Ogloff, both are lawyers and James Ogloff has worked as a psychologist for thirty years, in Capital punishment: arguments for life and death, “deterrence is used to suggest that executing murderers will decrease the homicide rate,” or “general deterrence” (3). By executing the murderer, the death penalty ensures he or she cannot…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supporters of the death penalty consider capital punishment the only way for true justice to be executed for the severest of crimes. Supporters also claim criminals that commit such harsh crimes, including murder and rape, deserve to be punished to the fullest extent of the law. Preventing future crimes and deterring criminals from committing such harsh acts also play key roles in support of the death penalty. Concrete proof of deterrence alone is not a valid reason for capital punishment, nor is it the underlying principle in use by astute death penalty advocates. Criminals ought to be punished for their crimes committed and not merely to deter others. That said however, the death penalty unquestionably "deters" the murderer who is executed. Strictly speaking, this is a form of incapacitation; similar to the way a robber put in prison is prevented from robbing on the streets. Vicious murderers must be eliminated to prevent them from murdering again, either in prison, or in society if they should get out. Both as a deterrent and as a form of permanent incapacitation, the death penalty helps to prevent future crime.…

    • 837 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before I proceed, I think it best to delve further into to the basics of criminal Deterrence, and what it is. Deterrence is based on the concept that if the consequence of committing a crime outweighs the benefits of the crime, then the perpetrator will be deterred from committing said crime. This is all in the idea that as humans we all know the difference between right and wrong and that with criminal behavior, a penalty is bound to follow, when an individual acts, they’re doing so out of free will and they know what they’re doing, be it right or wrong. Ironically the deterrence model is flawed to an extent with it’s thinking; criminals are rational, a murderer may be a murderer for the same reasons I choose to work as a salesman for the time being: because the profession makes him better off than anything else available to them. The model fails to realise that murderers, or anyone who commits crime for that matter, are constantly outweighing the benefits and repercussions of any actions they may commit, not thinking of what may be a rational and sound decision to others.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Death Penalty

    • 2140 Words
    • 9 Pages

    There are many differences in the way people view the death penalty. Some are against it and some agree with it. There have been many studies trying to prove or disprove a point regarding the death penalty. Some have regarded the death penalty as a hindrance, and some have regarded it as state sanctioned murder and not civilized. The death penalty has been linked to societies for hundreds of years. More recently, as we become more civilized, the death penalty has been questioned on if it is the correct way to so enforce justice on the people. The death penalty is a highly controversial subject. No one knows who’s right or who’s wrong-it’s fifty percent speculation and fifty percent research. It’s just a lot of thoughts and beliefs from people who have contributed to the death penalty controversy. Who’s right and who’s wrong? That is the question.…

    • 2140 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Death Penalty

    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Has anyone asked your views on capital punishment? The words lethal injection, electrocution, and gas chamber are synonymous with the death penalty. Even in today’s society of die-hard liberals, right-winged republicans, and middle of the road democrats the capital punishment argument is still a squeamish topic that incites strong emotional debate from abolitionists and supporters.…

    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Death Penalty

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sue, A. P. (1998, Jan 25). Pro-death penalty but chivalrous texans debate fate of karla faye tucker. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/408352096?accountid=32521…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Many positions can be defended when debating the issue of capital punishment. In Jonathan Glover's essay "Executions," he maintains that there are three views that a person may have in regard to capital punishment: the retributivist, the absolutist, and the utilitarian. Although Glover recognizes that both statistical and intuitive evidence cannot validate the benefits of capital punishment, he can be considered a utilitarian because he believes that social usefulness is the only way to justify it. Martin Perlmutter on the other hand, maintains the retributivist view of capital punishment, which states that a murderer deserves to be punished because of a conscious decision to break the law with knowledge of the consequences. He even goes as far to claim that just as a winner of a contest has a right to a prize, a murderer has a right to be executed. Despite the fact that retributivism is not a position that I maintain, I agree with Perlmutter in his claim that social utility cannot be used to settle the debate about capital punishment. At the same time, I do not believe that retributivism justifies the death penalty either.…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Death Penalty

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As a deterrent to crime, the death penalty has little effect because the chances of a murder being sentenced to death are slim to none. However the death penalty deters some people. As the Royal Commission (1948–1953) observed in its lengthy and thoughtful report, “We can number its failures, but we cannot number its successes.”23 We can never know how many people who would have otherwise committed murder stopped them only because society threatened death as punishment. The deterrence question, really, is not whether the death penalty deters—sometimes it surely does—but whether, on balance, it deters more effectively than life without parole. (D’elia).…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Death Penalty

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages

    (1) Capital Punishment, or execution, the sentence of death upon a person by judicial process as a punishment for an offense committed.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Death Penalty

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Share information with your classmates by topic if you wish. Post your Topic Sentence/abbreviated Thesis for peer review.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Thesis statement: Nevertheless Death penalty is unethical and inhumane; it helps to achieve the balance in the country.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    capital punishment

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Murder is wrong. Since childhood we have been taught this indisputable truth. Ask yourself, then, what is capital punishment? In its simplest form, capital punishment is defined as one person taking the life of another. Coincidentally, that is the definition of murder. There are 36 states with the death penalty, and they must change. These states need to abolish it on the grounds that it carries a dangerous risk of punishing the innocent, is unethical and barbaric, and is an ineffective deterrent of crime versus the alternative of life in prison without parole.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Have you ever thought about if the person sitting next to you is a murderer? If he is, what would you want from the government if he had killed someone you know? He should receive the death penalty! Murderers and other major offenders should be punished for the crimes they have committed and should pay the price for what they have done. Having the death penalty in our society is humane. It helps with overcrowding and gives relief to the families of the victims, who had to go through an event such as murder.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays