Preview

Boston Massacre History Paper

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1496 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Boston Massacre History Paper
The Boston Massacre: What Really Happened? We all know the story of the Boston Massacre; British troops fired into a group of colonists and killed five people, deeming it the start of the American Revolution. However, the story most people are not aware of are the reason behind the shooting and the events that led up to what is now known as the “massacre”. This topic is one of the most controversial moments in the American Revolution. Why were shots fired? Better yet, why were there weapons drawn on the colonists in the first place? And who was truly at fault for this “massacre”? Was it truly the British troops? Or was it in fact the colonists? The fate of one man’s life, Captain Thomas Preston, and his soldiers depended on the truth from the former questions. Through this essay, evidence will be looked at by the prosecution’s and defendant’s witnesses in the trial of Captain Preston and his soldiers in hopes to understand what truly happened on the night of March 5th, 1770.
The problem that arises from this case is whether the officer, Captain Thomas Preston, had actually given the order to fire into the colonists, and should he be charged with the murder of the killed colonists. One man, Richard Palmes, testified for Captain Preston claiming that he was standing right next to the Captain before the firing. He had asked the Captain if his soldiers’ guns were loaded and he confirmed that they were. When Palmes asked if he had any intent to “fire on the Inhabitants, [Preston] said by no means,” (Discovering the American Past, Palmes, pg. 94). Palmes explains that he saw ice strike one of the soldiers and the word ‘fire!’ was shouted; that is the moment when the first gun was fired, and the other soldiers followed in suit. When questioned, Palmes answered that he did not know who gave the orders to fire.
Palmes’ testimony was followed by others that aided Captain Thomas Preston’s case. Matthew Murray, another colonist, testified that he had “heard no order

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Crispus Attucks was an African-American man killed during the Boston Massacre and thus believed to be the first casualty of the American Revolution.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another man, Simon Winship gives account of his experience on the night of the Battle at Lexington and Concord. He states that he was riding his horse on the public road in Lexington, unarmed, when he was approached by the British troops and ordered to dismount his horse. When he asked why, he was removed from his horse by force from the British commanders. The commanding men ordered Winship to march with the troops. He refused, but somehow ended up marching with them for half of a quarter of a mile. The troops were told to halt, prime and load their weapons. The troops then marched on until they came into contact with Captain Parker’s militia. He then recounts that an officer at the head of the said British troops, “flourished his sword, and with a loud voice, giving the word fire, fire, which was instantly followed by a discharge of arms from said troops”. Winship accounts that he is positive that there was no discharge of arms from either side until the word fire was given by the said officer.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Leading up to the fierce and fiery confrontations at Lexington and Concord, a tumultuous period of debate and negotiation ensued regarding the preferred response of the colonies to British encroachment on their rights. The meeting of Virginian representatives in March of 1775 would prove to be a fruitless affair; that is, until a young, ardent lawyer by the name of Patrick Henry delivered an impassioned oration, with the intent of elucidating upon the reality of the situation: that the then-colonies were being driven to militant opposition of their royal overlords, and that to continue on passively would be to “retreat...[into] submission and slavery.” In his speech, Patrick Henry persuades the convention, and thereby the people, of the necessity of revolution through his employment of metaphorical imagery, stylized religious and mythological allusions, and a slew of rhetorical questions. In a blaze of libertarian sentiment, Henry incited the passions of the delegates and set the stage for the most glorious revolution in the history of mankind.…

    • 1600 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Adams was the only lawyer in Boston to take on the defense case of the British troops for the Boston Massacre. Adams agrees to take on the case, despite its unpopularity, because he believes that all men were entitled to a fair trial and deserved equal justice. He also has a position in Boston’s legislature as motivation, which is not shown in the film. We don’t get to see the rest of the defense team in the docudrama either; Josiah Quincy is left out. All accused men receive their own individual trial. All but two soldiers are acquitted; Hugh Montgomery and Matthew Kilroy are charged with manslaughter. Adams wins the case for his client and is elected to a higher position in the Massachusetts House of Representatives.…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The very next day we were told to leave the Boston by the Gov.Hutchinson .All the people of the Boston came on the street to insult and curse us .On march 13, the colony attorney general issued 13 indictments for murder. We were accused that the murder was all planned and all of us had revenge in hearts. In March 6 a warrant was issued for the arrest of Captain Thomas Preston and the officer in charge of the troops who did the shooting .Me and other seven soldiers under Preston’s command were clapped into prison later the same day. In a particular witness testified that one or two weeks before shooting , Pvt Killroy had said that “ he would never miss an opportunity ,if he had one to fire on the Boston people .…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    His doctor, Doctor Jefferies, later said that Carr did not blame the soldier who shot him. Carr was surprised that they did not shoot sooner. His ‘deathbed testimony’ was presented to court by Dr. Jefferies as follows, with Jeffries repeating what Carr said to him. “Prosecutor- Were the soldiers greatly abused? Jefferies- Yes, they were. Prosecutor- Would they have been hurt if they had not fired? Jefferies- Yes. Prosecutor- So they fired in self-defense? Jefferies- Yes, and he did not blame whoever it was that hit him.” This testimony was believed due to the fact that the jury did not think a dying man or his doctor would lie (Boston). This short excerpt from a newspaper article about the Boston massacre supports Carr’s testimony about the soldiers being harassed, “The noise brought people together; and John Hicks, a young lad, coming up, knocked the soldier down but let him get up again; and more lads gathering, drove them back to the barrack where the boys stood some time as it were to keep them in (Boston Massacre Historical).” Carr’s words let the soldier that shot him go free and spread unrest among the colonists. Samuel Adams took…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patrick Carr Influence

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages

    His doctor, Doctor Jefferies, said that Carr did not blame the soldier who shot him. Carr was surprised that they did not shoot sooner. His ‘deathbed testimony’ was presented to court by Dr. Jefferies as follows. With Jeffries repeating what Carr said to him. “Prosecutor- Were the soldiers greatly abused? Jefferies- Yes, they were. Prosecutor- Would they have been hurt if they had not fired? Jefferies- Yes. Prosecutor- So they fired in self-defense? Jefferies- Yes, and he did not blame whoever it was that hit him.” This testimony was believed due to the fact that the jury did not think a dying man or his doctor would lie(Boston). This short excerpt from a newspaper article about the Boston massacre supports Carr’s testimony abiut the soldiers being harassed, “The noise brought people together; and John Hicks, a young lad, coming up, knocked the soldier down but let him get up again; and more lads gathering, drove them back to the barrack where the boys stood some time as it were to keep them in (Boston Massacre Historical).” Carr’s words let the soldier that shot him go free and spread unrest among the colonists. Samuel Adams took…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another area which must be discussed is the metropole responses to acts of resistance in the peripheries. W.A. Speck mentions some British politicians believed duty on Tea was ‘a symbol of parliamentary sovereignty over the colonies’ (Speck, 2015, p.32). It could be argued the reprisal policies following The Boston Massacre demonstrate the metropole believed they had a right to exercise they perceived superiority, as they considered the peoples in the peripheries as children. Measures such as the The Quartering Act could be seen as the metropole exercising to its parliamentary sovereign. As mentioned above, the colonists saw these polices by the metropole is unfair. From a British point of view the acts of resistance were not only caused disruption to profits, it is highly likely some politicians they saw the acts of resistance as…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The colonists were throwing snowballs, sticks, and even stones at the soldiers. Furious the soldiers fired into the group of people, at that piont 3 people were killed and 8 people were badly injured. So, Captain Thomas Preston was taken on a trail there, John Adams and Josiah Quincey defend Captain Preston…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Adams was asked to defend the soldiers and their captain in court the day after the shootings. The soldiers had the odds against them. They were in an American court, with an American judge, and an American jury. No one else was bold enough to take on case as precarious as this case was. McCullough went on to state that John accepted this case because he strongly believed that no man in a free country should be denied the right to counsel and a fair trial (92). Adams knew what troubles he was getting himself into taking on a case like this and the repercussions it had. It would not have been his first difficult case, as he took on a similar case that involved four American sailors killing a British naval officer in self-defense that boarded the American ship. The captain was given a separate trial from the soldiers. Adam’s argued that it couldn’t be proven whether or not the captain gave orders to fire, and with a virtuoso performance given by Adams, the captain was found not guilty.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Of the eight soldiers who were charged with murder, six were acquitted and two convicted only of manslaughter because of their own admissions that they had fired their rifles directly into the crowd. Adams reduced the sentence for these two by invoking the ancient rule of "benefit of the clergy," by having the two soldiers in question demonstrate that they could read from the Bible. While this looks like sort of a cheap trick to modern eyes, it also helped demonstrate the very frivolity of that ancient and outmoded rule -- these men were obviously not priests but soldiers. Nevertheless, Adams' maneuver reduced their sentence from death to a branding of their thumbs. All eight defendants were sent home to England…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    140 people injured, 17 in critical condition, and three dead all due to a bomb at the Boston Marathon in Boston, Mass.…

    • 198 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A few years before this, many incidents occurred which prodded colonists to rise up against the tyrannical British Parliament, one of such events was the event known as the Boston Massacre. This event occurred on March 5, 1770. A squad of British soldiers, come to support a sentry who was being pressed by a heckling, snowballing crowd, let loose a volley of shots. Three persons were killed immediately and two died later of their wounds. The British officer in charge, Capt. Thomas Preston was arrested for manslaughter, along with eight of his men; all were later acquitted. This horrendous event assisted in unifying the colonies with one goal: to end the tyrannical reign of the British Parliament and its violation of basic, essential human rights that no man, government, or group had any right to infringe upon. The Boston Massacre sparked the colonists’ desire for independence for all Americans. This desire was the main factor in the birth of the American Revolutionary War, and subsequently the United States of America.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A town meeting has been called earlier today, demanding the dismissal of the British soldiers, and the trial of Captain Preston and his men for murder. Unfortunately at the trial, John Adams and Josiah Quincy II defended the British, leading to their release. Samuel Quincy and Robert Treat Paine were the attorneys for the prosecution. Luckily, two of the British soldiers were found guilty of…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The trial of Thomas Preston. The trials did not take place immediately. Thomas Gage, the commander of British troops in America, urged Thomas Hutchinson to delay the trials until feelings for the murders had cooled down. Two soldiers were convicted of murder. Thomas Hutchinson rushed to King Street where he found an angry crowd and a shaken Captain Preston. Hutchinson confronted Preston: "Do you know, Sir, you have no power to fire on any body of the public collected together except you have a civil magistrate with you give orders?" Hutchinson was a successful merchant and politician, Hutchinson was active at high levels of the Massachusetts government for many years, serving as lieutenant governor and then governor from 1758 to…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays