Preview

What Are The Causes Of The Boston Massacre

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
268 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are The Causes Of The Boston Massacre
On March 5, 1770, in Boston, Massachusetts, a mob of our patriotic colonists gathered around a British officer to confront him. The awful lad responded with violence! This fatal incident was caused by an uproar between our patriots and these British officers. This lethal massacre concluded with seven colonists dead, killing three on the spot.

British Captain Thomas Preston, the commanding officer at the Customs House, ordered his men to fix their bayonets and join the guard outside the building! An object hit Private Hugh Montgomery, leading him to discharge his rifle and shoot at the crowd! How horrid! The other soldiers began to fire, and joined him in butchering our fellow friends. When the smoke cleared, five colonists were dead—Crispus Attucks, Patrick Carr, Samuel Gray, Samuel Maverick, and James Caldwell.
…show more content…
The presence of these troops are increasingly unwanted! These men are the patriotic souls we lost in the bloody massacre last night Crispus Attucks, whom was a black sailor, ropemaker Samuel Gray, and a mariner named James Caldwell. Also, there were estimated to be 8 wounded men, two of whom died later (Samuel Maverick and Patrick Carr).
A town meeting has been called earlier today, demanding the dismissal of the British soldiers, and the trial of Captain Preston and his men for murder. Unfortunately at the trial, John Adams and Josiah Quincy II defended the British, leading to their release. Samuel Quincy and Robert Treat Paine were the attorneys for the prosecution. Luckily, two of the British soldiers were found guilty of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Colonel Campbell’s men were the first to charge up the hill and engage the Rangers (Alderman 36). The mountain was rough, but still they took charge. Campbell’s shouted appeal was, “Boys remember your liberty, come on, do it my brave fellows, another gun, another gun will do it.” When Shelby’s men approached the bottom of the hill, he yelled, “Now boys, quickly reload your rifles and let’s advance upon them and give them another hell of a fire.” More and more troops continued to take down the British. “The human slaughter was tremendous. The dead and wounded covered the mountain on the slopes and on the flat” (Alderman 38). Ferguson soon realized that he had pretty much lost, but he did not surrender yet. He broke his way through enemy lines; slashing his sword at whoever was in his way. Ferguson and two fellow officers were shot down by the creek. “Most historians have credited Robert Young with the deed. Regardless, the bullet that felled Ferguson soon brought the battle to an end” (Alderman 38). Captain Abraham De Peyster took charge of the British force after Ferguson died. Captain De Peyster continued to fight on, but he hopelessly realized there was not much more he and his troops could do, so he surrendered. A near tragedy occurred soon after the British surrendered. Tories, followers of King George III, grabbed their guns and fired at the patriots. The aftermath was very confusing…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The book begins from the point of view of the sentry who is guarding a building, but soon witnesses the Boston Massacre. Lawyer John Adams runs to the scene of the killing, but is told to go back home. He discusses the events with his wife, and the day after is asked to defend Captain Thomas Preston, who is accused of ordering the troops to fire. Thomas Gage, the commander in chief of British forces, meets with Massachusetts's governor Thomas Hutchinson and discusses removing the troops from Boston. Benjamin Franklin also discusses the events with Dr. Johnson. John Adams and Josiah Quincy successfully defend Captain Preston. Ben Franklin is voted to represent Massachusetts in Great Britain, but Lord Hillsborough refuses him to take the position. Franklin now becomes a symbol for the colonial cause. After the ship The Gaspee is burned, King George III orders that all colonial officials had to be appointed by the king. Massachusetts's citizens are outraged, and Adams calls…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On March 5, 1770, British soldiers were badgered to the point of outrage by a small group of boys (Wheeler and Becker, 75). The soldiers eventually retaliated at the group and the church bells started ringing alarming the town that a fire had broken out only leading the numbers in the crowd to increase (Wheeler and Becker, 75). Captain Thomas Preston and his sentry were called to the scene to assist. However, their attempts to redirect the crowd were unsuccessful. It is at this point that a musket was fired and the situation continued to escalate leaving some dead and others wounded (Wheeler and Becker, 75). Was Captain Thomas Preston guilty of murder by ordering his soldiers to fire? Or was he innocent and the soldiers fired out of provocation and their own volition?…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    His doctor, Doctor Jefferies, later said that Carr did not blame the soldier who shot him. Carr was surprised that they did not shoot sooner. His ‘deathbed testimony’ was presented to court by Dr. Jefferies as follows, with Jeffries repeating what Carr said to him. “Prosecutor- Were the soldiers greatly abused? Jefferies- Yes, they were. Prosecutor- Would they have been hurt if they had not fired? Jefferies- Yes. Prosecutor- So they fired in self-defense? Jefferies- Yes, and he did not blame whoever it was that hit him.” This testimony was believed due to the fact that the jury did not think a dying man or his doctor would lie (Boston). This short excerpt from a newspaper article about the Boston massacre supports Carr’s testimony about the soldiers being harassed, “The noise brought people together; and John Hicks, a young lad, coming up, knocked the soldier down but let him get up again; and more lads gathering, drove them back to the barrack where the boys stood some time as it were to keep them in (Boston Massacre Historical).” Carr’s words let the soldier that shot him go free and spread unrest among the colonists. Samuel Adams took…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patrick Carr Influence

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages

    His doctor, Doctor Jefferies, said that Carr did not blame the soldier who shot him. Carr was surprised that they did not shoot sooner. His ‘deathbed testimony’ was presented to court by Dr. Jefferies as follows. With Jeffries repeating what Carr said to him. “Prosecutor- Were the soldiers greatly abused? Jefferies- Yes, they were. Prosecutor- Would they have been hurt if they had not fired? Jefferies- Yes. Prosecutor- So they fired in self-defense? Jefferies- Yes, and he did not blame whoever it was that hit him.” This testimony was believed due to the fact that the jury did not think a dying man or his doctor would lie(Boston). This short excerpt from a newspaper article about the Boston massacre supports Carr’s testimony abiut the soldiers being harassed, “The noise brought people together; and John Hicks, a young lad, coming up, knocked the soldier down but let him get up again; and more lads gathering, drove them back to the barrack where the boys stood some time as it were to keep them in (Boston Massacre Historical).” Carr’s words let the soldier that shot him go free and spread unrest among the colonists. Samuel Adams took…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Battle of King's Mountain

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Major Ferguson of the Loyalist Militia was tasked with raising and organizing Loyalist units from the backcountry of South Carolina to help prtotect the British General Cornwallis. Ferguson gathered a few Tory units and marched towards Gilbert Town, North Carolina, where he set up a base camp. He issued a command to the opposition forces to lay down their weapons. If they refused he stated he would, "lay waste to their country with fire and sword." Patriot militia leaders John Sevier and Isaac Shelby sent word to William Campbell in Virginia to aid an attack on Major Ferguson. Many more more militiamen and local gunmen were rallied by the Patriot leaders. These some 1,400 men became what was known as the "Mountain Men". Among these hundreds of men were two traitors who deserted the Patriots and ran off the Gilbert Town to alert Ferguson of the mass of militia converging on him. The Major called for a full retreat to Charlotte, and requested reinforcements for General Cornwallis. The message did not reach Cornwallis until a day after the battle. The Patriot militia recieved word of Ferguson's retreat and urged on to try to catch him. Instead of reaching Charlotte, Ferguson's force camped at King's Mountain where they set camp just west of the mountain's highest point. In a rush to reach the Loyalist regime the Patriots sent over 900 men on horseback throughout the night and the next morning until they reached King's Mountain. The Mountain Men surrounded the camp and attacked.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The colonists were throwing snowballs, sticks, and even stones at the soldiers. Furious the soldiers fired into the group of people, at that piont 3 people were killed and 8 people were badly injured. So, Captain Thomas Preston was taken on a trail there, John Adams and Josiah Quincey defend Captain Preston…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lexington Concord

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What does Parker say the British troops did when they approached his militia?Troops made their appearance and rushed furiously, fired upon, and killed eight of our Party without receiving any Provocation therefor from us.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When they arrived at the depot, the families of the soldiers said their goodbyes, and gave the soldiers many gifts. Once the regiment arrived in Philadelphia they were greeted with fervor once again. A few days earlier the sixth Massachusetts marched through Baltimore, a secessionist town, and started a riot; the riot killed 36 of the regiment’s members. Because of this, they decided to board a steamer instead of continuing on the railroad. Several days later they landed in Washington.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boston Revolution Dbq

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Angry mobs of rebels have destroyed or taken away our homes and have even killed fellow loyalists to try and weaken support of the king. Despite their efforts to put an end to any and all those who opposed independence there were still determined loyalists who were not fazed by the want to diminish Parliament’s authority. These men brought information to British higher ups such as a rumored stockpile of cannons and ammunition in Concord. Having a random site of a vast amount of weaponry was clearly seen, by us Loyalists, as a danger to the colonies. General Thomas Gage, the appointed governor of Massachusetts who placed Boston under martial law, led the King’s troops to Concord.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patriots Vs Loyalists

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Patriots felt they needed justice against the Loyalists because since there was no intention to fire, they shouldn't have. If the Loyalists heard “FIRE” that doesn't mean they needed to fire especially if they weren't doing anything wrong. However, Candidus, a Loyalist, did not think they should get justice because they thought they were just doing their duty, they argued that, they heard “fire” so they fired and did what they were supposed to do. When they heard fire they knew it was important but in the text it says “It was clear that the soldiers need to protect themselves from the aggressive mob and the shots were fired in self defense with no actual order to fire.” Another difference between the Patriot and Loyalists’ viewpoints was that, The patriots were throwing snowballs at the loyalists that seemed to them to be ice balls. The loyalists took it as a threat. The patriots wanted justice against the loyalists. In the passage it says “According to Captain Preston, under an officer’s code of honesty, there was never an intention to actually fire.”, but the Loyalists point of view was, the patriots were throwing snowballs at the Loyalists, they seemed to be ice balls to the loyalists. They took that as a threat. The loyalists heard “FIRE” so they followed commands and did what they were supposed to do, it doesn't matter who yelled it, it just matters that they heard it so they fired. In the passage it says “The soldiers fired in self defense into a angry mob led by a few men trying to inspire a rebellion in the colonies… soldiers, at their duty posts, minding their own business and acting non- confrontational, were verbally assaulted by Bostonian men with epitaphs of “bloody back”, “lousy rascal”,...scoundrel” and “lobster”. Clearly, the two sides had different views on this topic, and ultimately, these differences led to arguments between…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A few years before this, many incidents occurred which prodded colonists to rise up against the tyrannical British Parliament, one of such events was the event known as the Boston Massacre. This event occurred on March 5, 1770. A squad of British soldiers, come to support a sentry who was being pressed by a heckling, snowballing crowd, let loose a volley of shots. Three persons were killed immediately and two died later of their wounds. The British officer in charge, Capt. Thomas Preston was arrested for manslaughter, along with eight of his men; all were later acquitted. This horrendous event assisted in unifying the colonies with one goal: to end the tyrannical reign of the British Parliament and its violation of basic, essential human rights that no man, government, or group had any right to infringe upon. The Boston Massacre sparked the colonists’ desire for independence for all Americans. This desire was the main factor in the birth of the American Revolutionary War, and subsequently the United States of America.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The trial of Thomas Preston. The trials did not take place immediately. Thomas Gage, the commander of British troops in America, urged Thomas Hutchinson to delay the trials until feelings for the murders had cooled down. Two soldiers were convicted of murder. Thomas Hutchinson rushed to King Street where he found an angry crowd and a shaken Captain Preston. Hutchinson confronted Preston: "Do you know, Sir, you have no power to fire on any body of the public collected together except you have a civil magistrate with you give orders?" Hutchinson was a successful merchant and politician, Hutchinson was active at high levels of the Massachusetts government for many years, serving as lieutenant governor and then governor from 1758 to…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although many historians believe that the Boston Massacre was an act of murder, it is clear that the incident was an act of self-defense. First reason why it was self-defense, is that the colonist Crispus Attucks was holding a cordwood stick and swung it at James Bailey. James Bailey then shot Crispus Attucks. James Bailey shot Crispus Attucks in act of self-defense. This led on to more shootings, but more colonists were getting angry and more violent. Another reason why it was self-defense, is that the captain of the British soldiers Preston, never did say fire and he never ordered his troops to fire. The colonists were taunting the soldiers by saying, "Fire, fire," which lead to more confusion. Also, Captain…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The event that occurred on March 5th, 1770 should be named “The Boston Incident” rather than “The Boston Massacre” because the term massacre usually reminds many that many people have been slaughtered. But in the “The Boston Massacre” less than ten people were killed so I wouldn’t consider it a massacre due to very few deaths. From account number two, William Taint says, “People still continued in the street, crying, “Fire, fire, and be damned,” and throw some more snow balls; whereupon I heard a musket go off, and in the space of two or three seconds, I heard the word “Fire” be given, but by whom I do not know and instantly the soldiers fired one after another.” I think that it was the Americans who instigated this incident because they were…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays