Blackfish Argumentative Analysis
Zoos, aquariums and circuses have had a lot of controversy over their uses of animals in captivity. After SeaWorld announced they will not have any killer whales in their facility people reacted with a cheer and some with sadness. The documentary released in 2013 on CNN “Blackfish” has made people's decision to stop going to and not agree with the animals in captivity all the more easier. According to Lisa Lange, senior vice president of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals has said “Change is already happening around the world.” For example, she mentioned Mexico, Spain and the U.S. have banned things to do with the exploitation of animals, such as animal circuses, bull fighting and the bullhook for training elephants. For other
…show more content…
When animals such as the killer whale are forced to do tricks for human entertainment it can be damaging for them. They are large creatures who live in tanks most not in suitable size for the animal and many die a premature death. Zoos all the while try to make the animals as comfortable as possible and help save animals left for dead. In the recent years the Columbus Zoo rescued a polar bear cub since the mother abandoned it and the cub has been doing great ever since. Zoos try to make the animals live longer, feel safe and live a normal life, but not all zoos try to make this possible. Some zoos only do things to earn money and sell these poor animals to other places like the circus. Zoos, circuses and aquariums maybe a good idea, but as said in the article “it means that lending our voice to the voiceless matters.” We as people need to do the right thing for the animal not for the exploitation of them. I agree seeing animals in person rather than a picture and or a video is much more breathtaking and can be educational for kids. For the animals they are not in there natural habitat and are not able to do the natural things they would in the environments. Maybe meeting halfway for the people who agree with Zoos and other facilities for animals won’t be enough. For example in the article it says “... increase the quality of life in captivity,
When animals such as the killer whale are forced to do tricks for human entertainment it can be damaging for them. They are large creatures who live in tanks most not in suitable size for the animal and many die a premature death. Zoos all the while try to make the animals as comfortable as possible and help save animals left for dead. In the recent years the Columbus Zoo rescued a polar bear cub since the mother abandoned it and the cub has been doing great ever since. Zoos try to make the animals live longer, feel safe and live a normal life, but not all zoos try to make this possible. Some zoos only do things to earn money and sell these poor animals to other places like the circus. Zoos, circuses and aquariums maybe a good idea, but as said in the article “it means that lending our voice to the voiceless matters.” We as people need to do the right thing for the animal not for the exploitation of them. I agree seeing animals in person rather than a picture and or a video is much more breathtaking and can be educational for kids. For the animals they are not in there natural habitat and are not able to do the natural things they would in the environments. Maybe meeting halfway for the people who agree with Zoos and other facilities for animals won’t be enough. For example in the article it says “... increase the quality of life in captivity,