Preview

Balanced Bipolarity, Balanced Multipolarity & Unbalanced Multipolarity

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1673 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Balanced Bipolarity, Balanced Multipolarity & Unbalanced Multipolarity
Balanced Bipolarity, Balanced Multipolarity & Unbalanced Multipolarity
Introduction
I agree with the quote that “Wars between states can be explained by the distribution of power and capabilities in the international system.” Power distribution among all the great powers plays an important role for the stability and economy of the state. I believe that war determines who will govern the international system, and whose interests will be primarily served by the new international order. Mearsheimer’s short article “The cause of great power war” explains the occurrence of major power wars. According to Mearsheimer, power gives rise to three kinds of systems which are known as Bipolarity, Unbalanced Multipolarity, and Balanced Multipolarity. I believe these systems are determining factors of the outbreak of war, and the distinction between balanced and unbalanced multipolar systems is important in comprehending the history of great power war.

Balanced Bipolarity (Cold War) Bipolarity is when two potential super powers have equal capability of powers. A good example for balanced bipolarity is the Cold War. Distribution of power after the Second World War was nearly equal between the United States and the Soviet Union. The fear of nuclear weapons resulted in conflict between the two nations; the search for security by Russia triggered insecurity in the US and vice versa. The Cuban Missile Crisis was not only the closest the United States and Soviet Union came to an armed conflict during The Cold War, but, the closest the world has come to a nuclear war as well. The Cuban president Fidel Castro agreed with Khrushchev's (president of Russia) plan to place missiles on the island, as a springboard to attack USA. The crisis started when photographs disclosed soviet missiles under construction in Cuba. Kennedy decided to set a naval quarantine around Cuba as he wanted to avert the arrival of more Soviet adversary weapons on the island. On



Bibliography: Mersheimer (2001) “The Cause Of great Power War”,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The emergence of the cold war began with the conception of superpower, which took place as a consequence of the imperial showdown that came to be known as the First World War. It was marked by the conflict between Wilsonism and Leninism in the aftermath of two consequences of the global conflict, the entry of the USA into what had been a largely European affair, and the Russian Revolution, both Nicholas II's autocracy and Kerensky's democratic republic falling before the seizure of power by the Bolsheviks (Kennedy, 1989). From this beginning, Woodrow Wilson spoke out on behalf of the world's greatest power, with maximum publicity. As a consequence of the First World War, the USA became stronger. The Soviet Russian Republic was weakened by the reverses inflicted by Germany and its allies, then by a civil war compounded by foreign intervention (Crockatt, 1995).…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Powder Keg Myth Essay

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. Offense-defense balance: Argues that wars are more likely when the offense is perceived to have relative advantage on the battlefield. Central argument scholars make when discussing how perceived offense dominance can cause crises to escalate to war – useful explanation for why states with essentially defensive foreign policy aims can stumble into war…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Clausewitz's Theory Of War

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Unsurprisingly, this statement generates criticism on applicability of Clausewitz’s theory with the increase of intra-state wars since the end of Cold War. For instance, H.P Willmott and Michael B. Barrett argued that Clausewitz’s theory is overly simplistic, and according to the Prussian, war has only one simple nature which is its subordination to policy and the theory lost its legacy as a result of absence of inter-state war since the first Gulf War. At first glance it might seem that war is inherently subservient to a government as it usually generates politics and directs policies. However, governments are not only policy makers and wage wars on another yet emergence of non-state actors brought change in the current security environment. In fact, Clausewitz had an answer to his critics if one read his book carefully. Essentially he said that “…..the feudal lords and trading cities of the Middle Ages, eighteenth-century kings and the rulers and peoples of the nineteenth century - all conducted war in their own particular way, using different methods and pursuing different aims”. It is therefore fair to assume that he was aware of other actors who would have different aims/policies than those of states. With regard to the ISIS, its main aim is to create Islamic caliphate and its actions against Iraqi and Syria governments, and against the West are continuation of its policies. Therefore, it is fair to say that Clausewitz’s hypothesis on war’s subordination to policy is still applicable while policy itself, in other word, war’s one of characters changing over time. War has been and would be always continuation of policy yet policy makers would decide to provoke it under their assumption of chance to succeed as…

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arquila's Summary

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to Arquila’s article for the foreign policy, one of the simplest approaches to recognize the patterns of War’s domination over time is observing statistics that portray the patterns of armed conflict all over the world. Statistics show a clear oscillation in the occurrence of armed conflict over the years, with an evident increase prior to the main world wars and decreases post-wars. Despite the evidence, the numbers of armed conflicts are at a steady increase and are almost double what they were recorded to be in the late 1950s.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There have been movements that support or oppose war throughout all of history. The 20th century saw this movement coalesce into a much larger and more diverse series of society changing events. Spanish-American war, World War I, World War II, the Cold War, Korea, Vietnam and Desert Storm were all wars that helped American society evolve into what it is today. For each of the conflicts, there were opposing points of view as to the amount of involvement or to even become involved at all. The pro-war or more conservative point of view lists strength and strong support for our allies as a primary focal point. The anti-war or liberal point of view is more of an isolationist or pacifist opinion that believes that diplomacy and understanding will resolve issues. This paper will discuss the opposing points of view leading up to each of the primary conflicts of the 20th century.…

    • 3507 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Early in the article, he claims war was an acceptable form of settling disputes among states until WWI. After the horrendous and detrimental war, nation-states started to recognize war didn’t have to be the “go to” solution. Today, even though it is more consistent of states realizing the grave effects of war, Howard claims no war is by accident. He sees war as a guaranteed function of state politics. Because governments are for the service of the people, if a nation sees benefit in going to war, than war will be the answer. Additionally, he believes war stems less from pathological leaders but more from stable leaders because it’s a calculated decision. He writes, “Wars begin with the conscious and reasoned decisions based on the calculation, made by both parties, that they can achieve more by going to war than by remaining at peace,”(37). Continually, Howard believes war to nation is a premeditated decision for power. Thus, in recent arm races, weapon production has always been a development in reaction to the nation’s adversary. In order to prevent further development of arm races “arms control become possible only when the underlying power balance has been mutually agreed.” A mutual agreeance of power definitely is a convincing argument to prevent war. Furthermore, his argument about war being a deliberate decision among leaders is definitely true for 20th century wars. However, today, the cause of war has seemed to be more complex. Especially in regards to Islamic terrorist attacks, often time it is less about a calculated decision for the people, but a personal call from their…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1959, the Cuban government was overthrown putting Fidel Castro in place as leader. The United States did not support Castro so he turned to the Soviets for help and they supported him and the new Cuban government became a communist government. In May of 1962, the Soviets then secretly built nuclear weapons in Cuba, and they largely went unnoticed. However, the Soviets were not the only ones with nuclear weapons pointed at their enemy. The United States had nuclear missiles in Turkey aimed directly at the Soviet Union. In October of that year, an American U-2 spy plane spotted the missiles and things turned tense. Congress debated whether or not they should attack and destroy said missiles in Cuba. They were unsure if more missiles were on Cuba and were afraid that there might have been. Tense negotiations took place between the two leaders at the time, Kennedy and Khrushchev. Attacks were expected to happen, however they never came. On October 28th, both sides had backed down and agreed to remove their respective nuclear weapons. This event came to be known as the Cuban Missile Crisis.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cuban Missile Crisis, that started October 18 1962 and lasted until the 29, made everyone uneasy. There was fear that a Third World War would break out if tensions did not improve. Nuclear weapons became a big concern; by 1969 the Soviet Union had matched the United States in their number of nuclear weapons. A state of mutually assured destruction (M.A.D) had obviously been reached. Mutually assured destruction meant that even if the Soviet Union attacked America with nukes, American would be capable to attack back and there would be no winners. People around the world feared a nuclear holocaust. While Dwight Eisenhower was president, the ideas of brinkmanship and massive retaliation were adopted. Both the US and the USSR believed that the more nuclear weapons a country had the stronger chance they stood. Massive retaliation meant that if the US was attacked by the USSR that they would use all available resources (mainly nuclear weapons) to destroy them. The military term "brinkmanship" means: "unions that threaten to strike and spouses that threaten divorce can also be involved in games of brinkmanship." Both the United States and the USSR were aware that if one of them attacked the other, it would be obliterate both countries. They both used a "second-strike" capability that made it possible for them to launch an attack even after being attacked. In theory, if one country attacked the other, and the other attacked back the world itself could be annihilate. With this…

    • 950 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peace During The Cold War

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages

    during the Cold War. John Mearsheimer wrote of the four different power balances that can be in a system, balanced bipolarity, unbalanced bipolarity, balanced multipolarity, and unbalanced multipolarity. In a bipolar system, there are only two great powers, while a multipolar system contains more than two powers. After WWII, there were two great powers to emerge, the United States and the U.S.S.R. They created a bipolar system, once which theorist claimed, “would last for as far into the future as anyone could see.” According to many theorists, a bipolar system is the most stable balance type that a system can have. Kenneth Waltz cites four factors for why a bipolar system is the most stable. First, two world powers means there are no peripheral powers to get in the way. Second, “the range of factors included in competition is extended as the intensity of the competition increases.” The United States was now not only competing with the U.S.S.R. economically and militarily, but also socially, to the point where Nixon considered the Supreme Court’s desegregation decision as the greatest victory of the war. Third, with a bipolar system, there is a constant pressure and reoccurring crises, where eventually “the absence of crises becomes more disturbing than their recurrence.” People are more aware of what to expect, so…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When analysing these incidents, it is understandable that many argue for the inevitability of the cold war. When two superpowers with different ideologies rise at the same period of time, it only makes sense that they will confront each other.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    World Order

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    However, military conflicts can destabilise this concept of the balance of power. The resulting devastation has drawn attention to the need for the legal system to preserve and maintain world order. However, the processes and restrictions brought about through such organisations as the UN and governments brings about dispute to the effectiveness of international power.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    War is used as a method for feuding countries as a way of solving conflict, when in reality, that is not the solution to a problem at all. War can be described as the waging of armed conflict against an enemy, an act to fight for what is right, or a harmful way of getting what one desires. We may not know what exactly war is but we do know its purpose. Every war is not the same, neither are its purposes. Wars have numerous purposes, from maintaining peace in the world to gaining freedom. Throughout history I believe that wars have started to maintain peace. I agree with Zalaski in the fact that “war is abhorred and yet ubiquitous” and the main purpose of war is to acquire agreement and resolve conflict.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    War and Peace

    • 4516 Words
    • 19 Pages

    The United States should use military force in defense of personal liberties and rights, for stability and security, in self defense, and as a last resort, when peaceful resolution and/or compromise is impossible. The goal of U.S. foreign policy should be to that which benefits itself and its citizens. Peace is possible, but not always sustainable. The topic of War and Peace has been the central, continually recurring issue throughout a majority of United States history, continually affecting everyday modern life within the international community. War is an unpleasant, yet necessary instance that will likely continue to pervade human interaction. Peace, being the opposite of war, is seen as preferable, but lacks the problem solving abilities of war. Because of this intricate relationship, the two will always be in tango, each affecting each other in every way. Foreign policy, the interaction with others, will constantly dictate the states of war and peace, and when their existence is permitted. The essay will attempt to explain war in terms of conflicting self interest, compromise, and violence. The essay will attempt to form a definite stance concerning foreign policy, and answer how we should interact with other people/countries, and why. Foreign policy stance will form the baseline for clauses of when going to war is acceptable. And war will be analyzed in depth to explain why it occurs, what happens in it, and what it ends in. These ideas will be supported by examples from American History, including the American Revolution, the Civil War, the French and Indian War, and French Revolution, through recognizing patterns throughout history, in-depth analysis, and factual evidence.…

    • 4516 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cold War

    • 2093 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In this ideologically hostile environment the Cold War began. It was characterised by the arms race between the two superpowers who were eager to preserve their spheres of influence. Both developed such powerful weapons which were too dangerous to be used in practice, but which contributed to the feeling of security, because they acted as deterrent. (These weapons could be used "politically"[as deterrent] but not "militarily"[since they would bring complete annihilation].) "Each side…

    • 2093 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wallimann, I. 1977, On Max Weber 's Definition of Power, Journal of Sociology, Vol. 13, No. 3, p. 231…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics