We instantly scan people for some characteristic we like and then we latch on to it.…
The physical attractiveness of a person influences every individual throughout every community, across the United States and around the world. All people inherit and alter their physical attractiveness, which is determined by complex, interdependent, physical, and non-physical factors. Hidden and not-hidden values drive thoughts and actions with significant effects and realities whereby higher physical attractiveness is beneficial, lower physical attractiveness is detrimental and associated pursuits are relentless. Physical attractiveness may look skin-deep as a surface aspect of appearance, but looks can be deceiving. Researchers throughout the world collect empirical data complemented with anecdotal data to probe beyond the surfaces. Through investigations that meet meticulous scientific methodological procedures, acute observations reveal previously undetected dimensions that advance understanding about physical attractiveness (Patzer, 2006).…
There are six factors that describe attraction. The mere exposure happens when we are around someone or something so much, we grow fond of it. For example, you go to training classes for your new positions for the next 4 weeks. When you are hired you are more likely to hang around the people who sat closest to you during your weeks of training. We are more attracted to individuals who are attractive. In a study that evaluated attraction bias and the effect it had on hiring managers, 112 managers were given four potential candidates resume and pictures to go over. The managers chose candidates who were more attractive (Marlowe, Schneider,& Nelson, 1996). We are attracted to individuals that we can relate to. For example, advocates for PETA and a person who works on a slaughter farm are less likely to be associated with each other. Along with being attracted to those we relate to, we are also attracted to individuals we look like. For example, in a room full of Hispanics and Blacks, Hispanics are more likely to mingle with Hispanics; the same with black individuals. We are less likely to befriend someone of another culture because of the factor, we are more attracted to individuals we look like. Feenstra also suggest we like individuals who are had to get because “they are selective in their social choices” (Feenstra, 2011, Ch. 13.1, “We like Those Who Are Hard to Get”). If we can form a bond with this individual, it can…
The two major pioneers of early cinema in both Soviet Russia and America, they were D.W Griffith who developed continuity editing through practice, he enhanced film as if it were theatre as if it was in real space and time, whereas Sergei Eisenstein who initially developed montage further through the theory, he did this by breaking the confines of time and space in order to communicate new abstract ideas. In 1918 Eisenstein wrote a manifesto, The Montage of Attractions, this developed Lev Kuleshov ideas and theories about the construction of meaning through editing. Throughout his career, Eisenstein would return to his concept of an ‘intellectual montage’ this is where the counterpoint and juxtaposition produced not just a visual reaction…
as well. We tend to look at someone and think that their looks tie in with their personality…
As human being there is the thought that love is difficult to understand. Why are some people attracted to the people that they are attracted to and what is it that draws them to each other? Understanding the dimensions of love and knowing attachment styles clear up some of the confusion. There are three dimensions of love: intimacy, passion, and commitment. These are known as the triangular theory of love (Sternberg, 1986, 1987).…
Like other similar research, this study will determine that it is the similarities not the differences that bring people together when they are selecting their mates. This study explores this concept based strictly on physical attractiveness levels. Participants will be asked to rate each member of a couple separately and then the rating will be compared. If the expected result is achieved, each individual will have a rating similar to that of their mate. It was concluded that people select mates that have a similar physical attractiveness level to their own.…
Walster`s matching hypothesis implies that persons search for a partner is influenced by what they want in a partner and who they think they can get as a partner. The more socially desirable a person is, the more they would expect their potential partner to be. In this sense, most people are in fact influenced by their chances of having affection reciprocated. This relates to how someone may feel that another individual is ‘out of their league’, where they deem the chances of such individual returning their affection as improbable. Overall the initial attraction towards someone would be determined by a comparison between the other person’s attractiveness and their own attractiveness. Those that are matched in social desirability are more likely to interact affectionately and consequently are more likely to have successful relationships than individuals that are mismatched.…
Heather M. Chapman’s article, “Love: A Biological, Psychological, and Philosophical Study” (2011), asserts that the idea of love can be defined in a biological, psychological, and philosophical way. Chapman supports this claim by specifically going into detail with each concept, stating how it effects humans and how they choose…
Hazan, C. and Shaver, P. (1987) Romantic love conceptualised as an attachment process, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), p.511-524.…
Have you ever though why do we tend to like others more or what is the real reason why we have chosen particular person to love or be friends with? According to our book the answer is all about attraction. Attraction could be defined like the combination of other smaller details, like physical attractiveness, similarity or proximity. These factors are known to affect our liking for one another. Proximity-geographic nearness- is conducive to attraction, partly because mere exposure to novel stimuli enhances liking. Physical attractiveness influences social opportunities and the way one is perceived. As acquaintanceship moves toward friendship, similarity of attitudes and interests greatly increases liking. (All definitions reference are to the class text, Myers, G. David, Exploring Psychology 6th edition in modules, 2005, p. 633). (Myers, 2005) Moreover, if we would look in our daily lives we would definitely see that this theory is absolute true, people tend to like each other mostly because of these factors.…
Relationships with the individuals around us are crucial to ones social existence. Personal accounts by people who have been isolated from the outside world serve as a reminder of our dependence on others. What draws us into these "relationships?" Studies of interpersonal attraction have concluded that people are attracted mostly to those that they find physically attractive and who are geographically close. To understand why we are attracted to certain individuals we must first understand an individual's person perception or the process of forming impressions of others. First impressions often help us to determine whether we are attracted to another individual. Our first impressions of an individual have a great impact on our perception of that person, even though we encounter that person for only a brief period of time. When we perceive a person we account for both the positive and negative characteristics of that individual. Although most people seem to be interested in another individual's positive characteristics, the negative information is usually weighed so heavily that it overrules all the positive information about that person.…
Love is a universal experience, yet it is still one of the greatest mysteries left to be solved. “What is love?” is a question theorists from a number of different fields continue to ask. For thousands of years, philosophy and religion have tried to answer this question with an array of different theories. Now, in the last century, with the development of psychology, science is trying to answer it too.…
Most people when being asked why they are attracted to their partners would reply back with answers like attentive, attractive, supporting, caring, etc. This suggests that we are more likely to be attracted to people that we are satisfied or gratified to be with. Most stimuli in our lives can be classified into negative and rewarding ones. We tend to search for rewarding stimuli and avoid the negative stimuli. The things that we are most likely going to find rewarding tend to reflect our unsatisfied needs such as the need for company, financial security, an attractive partner and so on. Mutual attractions usually occurs when one meets the other’s needs although one might need company and the other in search for financial security.…
It can happen to anybody at any place, on any day. At first you fall in love or get attracted to the physical being of a person. As it is said appearance does matter.…