Preview

Analyze the Reason for the Anti-Federalist’ Opposition to Ratifying the Constitution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
466 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analyze the Reason for the Anti-Federalist’ Opposition to Ratifying the Constitution
To a remarkable degree Anti-Federalist had many different views and motivations to reject the ratification of the Constitution. The both parties Federalist (also known as Nationalist) had different views on the constitution, Anti-Federalist opposed the Constitution. They felt the articles should only be amended, it also felt that the constitution gave more power to the central government and less to the states, and for having such a negative sounding label the Anti-Federalist didn’t get as much support as the Federalist. Before the constitution we have today, there was something known as the Articles of Confederation, which was essentially an early version of the Constitution. When the Articles of Confederation were written, a group of American leaders thought that the newly-written articles didn't give the main federal government enough power and that too much power was being given to individuals and the state. They called themselves the federalists. To oppose them a new group formed called the Anti-Federalist. They felt that the articles should be changed, because the Original Articles wanted to give the central federal government a lot more power over the states, which caused the anti-Federalist to opposed. Anti-Federalist felt that the Constitution gave more power to central government and less to the states. Anti-federalist saw the constitution as a sinister plot by an Elite leader; “to lord it over to the rest of their fellow citizens, to trample the poorer part of the people under their feet that they may be rendered their servants as slaves.” They also argued that the constitution would become to tyrannical because the central government wouldn’t be able to run all states as a result of being too distant and removed from interest of common citizens and farmers. The Anti-Federalist didn’t ever top off a counter campaign effective as the Federalists’ pamphlets, speeches, and newspaper editorials. Federalist had a base support of commercial farmers,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In 1787 when the Constitution was created it caused many people to start a grand debate. Of course, there were people that supported the constitution and people that were afraid of the constitution. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists created documents that are within the Constitution that have shaped United States political parties. The Federalists supported a strong central government because the Articles of Confederation didn’t have strong national power, and was very restrictive.A reason why The Federalist wanted to change the constitution was to add people’s opinion into the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists supported a strong state government because they believed that a strong national government would cause a monarch and they were afraid of who will have the power.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "A free republic cannot succeed over a country of such immense extent, containing such a number of inhabitants......as that of the whole United States." (Brutus I) First of all, anti-federalists thought that a republic must be small and uniform to survive. The United States was a large country that had 1200 miles long and 200 miles inland, and it also had big population which had wide range of religions and races. They thought if a national government had a strong power that would insulate from the people and would abuse the power to deprive the powers belonged to the states. For instance, the legislature of the U.S had great and uncontroulable powers: the Congress would tax heavily from the states and regulate the inter-states trade; the Supreme Court would overrule state courts; and the president would come to raise and support large armies. Brutus noted Article I, Sec. 8 implied powers "the necessary and proper." It meant that the states reserved certain powers, and considerable powers could be added. Also, a strong central government would threaten the rights of common people. Because the Constitution was created by…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S Constitution DBQ

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The writing of the U.S Constitution generated many concerns over the amount of power to be allowed in the Federal Government. Political parties of Federalists and Antifederalists formed, sparking debate over the issue. As Federalists supported the proposed U.S Constitution, Antifederalists supported the government formed under the Articles of Confederation. Federalists felt that a strong central government would give protection to public and private credit. Many large landowners, judges, lawyers, leading clergymen, political figures, and merchants were in favor of ratifying the U.S Constitution. James Madison writes in Federalist Papers #10, “Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith and public of personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable” (Doc. A). Congressmen such as Madison strongly supported a stronger Federal Government. The existing government under the Articles of Confederation needed to be altered to ensure more control over the states. Federalists believed that if change wasn’t made the nation would fail. “Either the…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Those in favor of the Constitution called themselves Federalists. Those opposing the Constitution and in favor of more power towards the states called themselves Antifederalists. One strong argument for the Antifederalists side was that the Constitution did not protect the liberties of the people (B). The Constitution did not include a bill of rights which displeased many Americans. When it came time to vote, there were many Antifederalists absent at the polls. Because the Federalists had such figures as Washington and Franklin on their side, as well as organized and aggressive strategies, they were victorious in making the Constitution the law of the United States. The final state to help put this into place was New Hampshire. Even though the majority had voted in favor of the Constitution, some states still opposed it, making them susceptible to succession. Through persuasive speeches and constant campaign, the Federalists won over the final states of New York and Virginia. After a huge demand for a bill of rights from the people, as well as the states of Massachusetts, Virginia, and New York, the new government decided one shall be composed…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    They were the people who opposed the new constitution. They were afraid of a stronger government.Anti-Federalism refers to a movement that opposed the creation of a stronger U.S. federal…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Government Final Notes

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages

    - Anti-federalist were those who favored strong state governments and a weak national government; opposed the ratification of the U.S. Constitution.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1776, Continental Congress called upon the colonies to make a constitution, in other words the Continental Congress was asking the colonies to present themselves as new states. Soon after the Articles of Confederation was created and was accepted by Congress in 1777 but wasn’t adopted by all thirteen states until 1781. The Articles of Confederation was America’s First Constitution and is often called the “Articles of Confusions.” The Articles of Confederation had linked all thirteen states but all were dealing with similar issues like foreign affairs. There was no executive branch because Congress was the chief agency of government and the judicial branch was left exclusively to the states. Pretty soon everybody was noticing that the Articles of Confederation were failing so the idea of a constitution was born.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalist and Antifederalist had different ideas and beliefs of the nation’s government. Antifederalist believed in more power for the states and did not agree with a strong central government. They preferred the Articles of Confederation. Antifederalist did not want to ratify the Constitution due the fact there was no bill of rights and there was too much power in the national Constitution and not the States. On the other hand, Federalist believed in a more centralized national government. Federalist propose the separation of powers, which the act of vesting the legislative, executive, and judicial powers of government in separate bodies.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Forming this new country was a tough process. There were several different ideas. After realizing that the country was too weak under the Articles of Confederation. In result, there came a new idea; which was to ratify the Constitution. The procedures for ratifying the new Constitution were as controversial as its contents. This is where the fight to ratify the constitution began. The Anti-Federalists had many central arguments against the adoption of the Constitution. The proponents, the Federalist proposed a better argument for defending the ratification of the new Constitution which caused them to prevail.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalists were individuals who supported the ratification of the Constitution. Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution as stated in the book, "the critics of the Constitution were by no means a unified group" (Faragher, 180). I found it interesting that the Constitution was initially influenced by the Federalist model in regards to interpretation but the pendulum has now swung in the opposite direction to a more Anti-Federalist approach (Content 8-2). The Constitution was ratified and the Federalists won for numerous reasons. The Anti-Federalists had delayed representation while the Federalists promised to amend the Constitution to better protect individual's rights (Faragher, 181). Overall, it was the Federalist representation, planning,…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Anti-Federalists have their reasons & the Federalists have theirs. I’m against the idea of a central government and how the freedom of the states should be.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Anti Federalists

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The antifederalists were a coalition made up of people from many different backgrounds who opposed ratification of the Constitution. Their organization was not as good as the Federalists; however, they had a profound group of leaders who were exceptional in state politics. Anti-Federalists were an important existence in most states. In several states, supporters of the Constitution agreed to provide support from mild anti-Federalists with recommendations to secure amendments. During ratification the expectation was that the Constitution would be changed to address some of the opponents' concerns. The anti-Federalists worked within the Constitution's bounds after the ratification and they expected Federalists to do the same. Their ratification…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist debate has been seen time and time again throughout U.S history. The Federalists argue that a strong central government is necessary to protect the country and solve domestic problems. Whereas the Anti-Federalists argue that a strong central government cannot be trusted and that the states should have more power. This issue is an important concept today because it can be applied to so many of the debates on hot button issues such as abortion, government surveillance, gun rights, The ACA and many more. For example; in the issue of government surveillance the side that is most like the federalists in this case are those for government surveillance.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Mr. Budas, an eighth grade Social Studies teacher at McCord Junior High there are three major differences between the Federalist and the Anti Federalist. The first major difference is, the federalist believed in a strong central government and were for a new constitution. The Anti Federalist opposed the constitution. They believed that it would give the federal government too much power and they would revert back to how it was with Great Britain. Another major difference is, the federalist believed in representation and that it should be based on the population of the state. The anti federalist believed that states should have the same representation in Congress and that one person was not enough to represent so many people.…

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism Vs Federalism

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Federalists favored a balanced relationship with the federal and state government. For example, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton were in favor of a strong central government. They saw that the states had too much power and thought that under the new constitution , the new national government needed to be stronger. On the other hand, the Anti-federalists favored a weaker national government with power belonging to the states. For example, Patrick Henry favored this idea that the state has most of the power.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays