Preview

Comparing The Federalists And Anti-Federalism

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
307 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing The Federalists And Anti-Federalism
Federalists

The Federalists were people who wanted and believed in the new Constitution. They had people who disagreed with them called the Anti-Federalists. The Federalist Party originated in opposition to the Democratic-Republican Party.Emphasized commercial and diplomatic harmony with Britain following the signing of the 1794 Jay Treaty. The party made a lasting impact by laying the foundations of a national economy, creating a national judicial system and formulating principles of foreign policy.Founded in 1792, dissolved in 1824.

Anti-Federalists

They were the people who opposed the new constitution. They were afraid of a stronger government.Anti-Federalism refers to a movement that opposed the creation of a stronger U.S. federal
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists Dbq
    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists Dbq

    The Anti-Federalists believed that a strong state government was needed because if you have a strong central government than the people’s rights will not be ensured. (Doc. 4) Patrick Henry opposed the ratification of The Constitution because he believed that without it containing the Bill of Rights it would not allow the people have their natural rights. Anti-Federalist didn’t want to have a stronger national government because it could destroy the liberties of America that have been won during the Revolutionary…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalists Vs Antifederalist Analysis
    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page

    Federalists Vs Antifederalist Analysis

    During the 1700’s, the first political parties formed over disagreements in the government. The two parties were the federalists and Antifederalists. Federalists made up the people who felt that the stronger government was better for the country and supported the Constitution. The federalists had felt as if different “fiscal and monetary policies” were a weakness for the national economy. Also, the federalists supported banking("Anti-Federalist vs Federalist"). Federalists wanted to fight for stronger governments, managing the country’s debt and ratification. Antifederalists were people who opposed the Constitution of 1788 and disagreed with a stronger federal government. The Antifederalists wanted to keep the power to be for states and local…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    DBQ Jeffersonian vs. Federalists
    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages

    DBQ Jeffersonian vs. Federalists

    During the time period of 1801 to 1817, there were multiple issues in the United States ranging from wars to political boundaries. This time period saw the termination of the Federalist party. The conflicts were between two parties called the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists. The Federalist party was officially started by John Adams. John Adams was also a loose constructionist just like all the other Federalists. Federalists were in favor of a strong central government. On the other side, was Thomas Jefferson who was in office from 1801 to 1809. Jefferson started the Jeffersonian Republican party. The Jeffersonians were strict constructionists who believed in states rights. They said that anything that is not stated in the Constitution, is reserved for the states to decide. However, this was not always the case. The statement that the Jeffersonian Republicans are usually characterized as strict constructionists who were opposed to the broad constructionism of the Federalists is partly accurate during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison. While any party is in office, that party will almost always be loose constructionists because each party in office wants more power. The Jeffersonians started out as strict constructionists but slowly turned into loose constructionists because they were in office for twenty years.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Views of the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists on the Interpretation of the Constitution Essay Example
    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Views of the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists on the Interpretation of the Constitution Essay Example

    Federalists, who most of them gained their livelihoods as merchants, shopkeepers, professionals, artisans, and commercial farmers, desired a government that would foster the growth of a market economy and facilitate trade with other countries. They also believed that society benefited when people pursued individual goals. Federalist James Madison claimed that the Constitution would be beneficial because a large republic contained more safeguards than a small one, but Anti-Federalists disagreed with that, because they favored small republics and because they feared the actions of men who would likely dominate the central government. Anti-Federalists, who were small farmers, many of them debtors, wanted nothing to do with this Constitution. They believed that the power should remain in the states. They argued that a republic must be geographically small with a homogeneous population in order to meet the needs of its people. Anti-Federalists also thought that the Constitution lacked adequate protection against corruption and abuse of power.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Federalist vs. Anti-federalist Perspectives on the Constitution
    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federalist vs. Anti-federalist Perspectives on the Constitution

    Before the state convention, there is a great issue about liberty. One proponents of the Constitution are federalists who favor to establish a stronger national government; one opponents of the Constitution are anti-federalists who favor to establish a weaker national government. Federalists think only a stronger national government have an ability to keep the states in control. Anti-federalists think the states should have more power than the national government. Even though the conflict between federalist and anti-federalist doesn't stop, whether it is a federalists or anti-federalists, they have the same dream to united the states to become a strong country. The perfect decision is to use the best way to administrate the country and stabilize the society. In my opinion, a stronger national government will keep the country developing.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Articles of Confederation and Founding Fathers Energy
    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Articles of Confederation and Founding Fathers Energy

    The anti-federalists were led by Thomas Jefferson. They believed the Constitution alone did not protect the rights of the people. They later added the Bill of Rights to…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalist vs Anti-Federalist
    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Federalist vs Anti-Federalist

    The debates over ratification of the Constitution represent the most important and intellectually sophisticated public debates in American history. On the one side, the supporters of the Constitution, or "Federalists," argued that the nation desperately needed a stronger national government to bring order, stability and unity to its efforts to find its way in an increasingly complicated world. Opponents of the Constitution, or "Antifederalists," countered that the the governments of the states were strong enough to realize the objectives of each state. Any government that diminished the power of the states, as the new Constitution surely promised to do, would also diminish the ability of each state to meet the needs of its citizens. More dramatically, the Antifederalists argued that the new national government, far removed from the people, would be all to quick to compromise their rights and liberties in the name of establishing order and unity.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Comparing The Federalists And Democratic Differences
    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page

    Comparing The Federalists And Democratic Differences

    the Federalists and Democratic differences were that they both had a different leader Federalists had Alexander Hamilton and Democratic Republicans leader was Thomas Jefferson. Federalists, lost interception of the constitution and they, and also the federal constitution. The Federalist was in charge to protect the Tarrifs. Federalist thought that it should be educated men who should own their own property and would also protect everyone's rights. The Democratic Republicans differences were that the they wanted the limit the government power.…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Compare And Contrast Democratic And Federalists
    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page

    Compare And Contrast Democratic And Federalists

    Federalists and Democratic-Republicans are very different in the way they think and act. Federalists had a strong federal government and were ruled by a wealthy class while the Democratic republicans had a strong state government and were ruled by people…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Legislative Cooperative Federalism
    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Legislative Cooperative Federalism

    Anti Federalist- small farmers frontiersmen who believed that government should be close to the people and that the concentration of power in the elites is dangerous. This relates to the topic of are unit because people were trying to figure out a way to govern our country and the Anti- federalists thought a certain way. This concept is important to American politics because the Anti federalists were a party who had a certain belief and they are just like the republican or democratic party today.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Anti Federalism Pros And Cons
    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Anti Federalism Pros And Cons

    The federalists were people who supported and promoted the new constitution. These people actually had more of an advantage than their opponents, the anti-federalists. This was because many of their leaders were or had been members of the constitutional convention and were already familiar with the disputed issues in the document. (America, 199) The federalists were therefore much more organized and prepared.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Federalism
    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Federalism

    We Federalist’s believe that the government needs to be divided into three parts, with equal powers and balances and checks, for it to work effectively. Now the Anti-Federalist’s believe that we are trying to give all power to the larger states in the North and ignore the needs of our brethren the South states. We are not. We are just trying to create a fair government.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    What Are The Similarities Between The Federalists And The Whigs
    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages

    What Are The Similarities Between The Federalists And The Whigs

    The new supporters of the constitution became known as the Federalists. The Federalist Party was established originally to support the creation of a strong national government, after the…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Difference Between Federalist And Anti-Federalists
    • 69 Words
    • 1 Page

    Difference Between Federalist And Anti-Federalists

    What's the difference between a Federalist and an Anti-federalist? Why did they have different perspectives on the ratification of the Constitution? Republicans and Democrats are not the original political parties. As i'm getting older i will be eligible to vote at the age 18, I will know the difference between the two. The Political parties had changed over the year where now the rules are way different back then.…

    • 69 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Compare And Contrast Democrats And Federalists
    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Democrats And Federalists

    Federalists believe in a strong federal system of governance, promotion of nationalistic government meanwhile the democratic- Republican believe in the promotion of the principles of republicanism over elitism. They both have different input of their philosophies too, the Democratic- Republicans believe and follow the Jeffersonian Democracy and Republicanism, while Federalist party follows Federalism, on the idea of industrialization and nationalism. Both parties also believed in liberty and freedom of the people. They opposed on every known issue. The Federalist Party believed in a strong central government while the Republican Party believed in the rights of the states. They reasoned saying that the liberty could only be protected if the power rested in the hands of the people. The Republicans had the view that the state could exercise powers only enumerated in the constitution. Federalists on other hand considered a loose reading of the constitution. They argued that state had the right to make laws necessary for the functioning of the government which were not forbidden by the…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics