Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Evaluate Arguments for and Against the Ratification of the Constitution.

Good Essays
705 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Evaluate Arguments for and Against the Ratification of the Constitution.
The year is 1776, American has just gained it’s independence from Great Britain. The Declaration of Independence has been signed and the United States has experienced a rebirth. What is next for this great country? The Articles of Confederation came and went because it didn’t really work for the states. The great idea of having a constitution for ALL the states came up which also brought up many debates, disagreements, and arguments within the states. After having ratified the constitution arose more debate and heated arguments between the states. This brought curiosity whether the Great United of America would survive because they had just beat the world’s strongest country and they are arguing over how to run their country? Doesn’t look so good for America. Although there were people who knew that America would make it through and be more successful than ever. In 1776, Continental Congress called upon the colonies to make a constitution, in other words the Continental Congress was asking the colonies to present themselves as new states. Soon after the Articles of Confederation was created and was accepted by Congress in 1777 but wasn’t adopted by all thirteen states until 1781. The Articles of Confederation was America’s First Constitution and is often called the “Articles of Confusions.” The Articles of Confederation had linked all thirteen states but all were dealing with similar issues like foreign affairs. There was no executive branch because Congress was the chief agency of government and the judicial branch was left exclusively to the states. Pretty soon everybody was noticing that the Articles of Confederation were failing so the idea of a constitution was born. Many people believed that the Constitution was a great idea! The people who supported the constitution were called Federalists. The Federalists included Alexander Hamilton, James Wison, John Jay, John Marshall, James Madison, John Dickinson, and Roger Sherman. Federalists thought that the Constitution was the greatest idea since cheese in ball form! They wanted everyone to adopt it and embrace it. There were people however that didn’t agree. Although there were people who loved the constitution concept, there were people who disagreed with the idea. People who did not support the constitution were referred to as Anti- Federalists. The Anti- Federalists included Patrick Henry, George Mason, Richard Henry Lee, James Monroe, John Hancock, Samuel Adams, Elbridge Gerry, George Clinton, Willie Jones, and Melancton Smith. The Anti- Federalists hated the constitution they thought that the constitution was a bunch of crap. The North really didn’t like the constitution because it declared that slaves should be considered citizen which would then out populate the North. In the end the constitution passed with eleven out of thirteen states. Delaware was the first to accept the Constitution. North Carolina and Rhode Island were the only two who rejected the Constitution but these states later on reversed their vote. After accepting the Constitution came the part in choosing who would be part of Congress. The decision was that the Congress was to be bicameral which included the House of Representatives and the Senate. Large states like Virginia thought that the number of representative should be based on population but smaller states like New Jersey believed that every state should an equal amount of representation. The solution was the great compromise. The Great Compromise included both ideas. The House of Representatives was based on population and the Senate has had a set number for each state which was, and still remains to be, two. In conclusion, although there was debate over how the country should live by we all soon saw what was best for the country and went for it. America learned that the Articles of Confederation were not a good as the Constitution which is why its here today. If the Articles of Confederation was still in effect then who knows how America could have ended up or maybe even fallen. America could not have had the amazing present day Constitution if they didn’t bump heads on whether to ratify the constitution. The Founding Fathers are to thank for the present day lifestyle. Without the Founding Fathers who knows if America would still exist to this day.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    People didnt want a Constitution and believed that things were just fine the way they were and everything should be left alone. In Document 2 we see that Mercy Otis Warren was an opponent. He had fear that the Constitution would threaten the rights of conscience and liberty of press. Patrick Henry was also against ratifying the Constitution. In Document 4, he says that a Constitution would endanger the rights and privileges that the people had and they would lose sovereignty, the freedom from an external control. In Document 5, Amos Singletree also opposed the ratification of the Constitution. But he doesn’t only fear the possible threat of people’s rights, he, being poor, was afraid that only rich learned men would be able to have power, and will have total rule over the poor…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S Constitution DBQ

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The writing of the U.S Constitution generated many concerns over the amount of power to be allowed in the Federal Government. Political parties of Federalists and Antifederalists formed, sparking debate over the issue. As Federalists supported the proposed U.S Constitution, Antifederalists supported the government formed under the Articles of Confederation. Federalists felt that a strong central government would give protection to public and private credit. Many large landowners, judges, lawyers, leading clergymen, political figures, and merchants were in favor of ratifying the U.S Constitution. James Madison writes in Federalist Papers #10, “Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith and public of personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable” (Doc. A). Congressmen such as Madison strongly supported a stronger Federal Government. The existing government under the Articles of Confederation needed to be altered to ensure more control over the states. Federalists believed that if change wasn’t made the nation would fail. “Either the…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1781, the Articles of Confederation were written in order to secure the states' rights. This document lacked many qualities necessary for a successful government, and therefore caused a great deal of debate concerning the ratification of a new system. Federalists advocated the passing of a new Constitution, welcoming the tie it would establish between states and the creation of a strong central government. Opposing the constitution were the anti-federalists, threatened by its ability to eliminate their liberties just as they were previously executed by King George III.…

    • 527 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Study Guide

    • 2513 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Articles of Confederation Adopted in 1777 during the Revolutionary War, the Articles established the United States of America. The Articles granted limited powers to the central government, reserving most powers for the states. The result was a poorly defined national state that couldn't govern the country's finances or maintain stability. The Constitution replaced them in 1789…

    • 2513 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people who desired change in government were called Federalists. James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and Ben Franklin were all a part of the Federalists. The Federalists believed that the economy was in turmoil because of the Articles (Doc 1). Under the Articles each state had its own currency which created a problem for interstate trade. Another issue that the Federalists had was that the rich were not making money. On August 1, 1786, George Washington wrote a letter addressed to John Jay stating that they “have errors to correct”. In saying this Washington agrees in the fact that the Articles needed to be revised. The Federalists believed that the government trusted the people with too many rights. The states were allowed to refuse the Federal government whenever they chose. The new country that was trying to establish themselves, weren’t united, but instead “thirteen sovereign, independent, disunited States” (Doc 3). The central government didn’t have enough power under the Articles. The Federalists believed that even though they didn’t want to be ruled again like they were under England’s rule, that it was necessary to have a strong central government.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is true that the national government would have greater power than it did under the Articles of Confederation. But its powers are limited to tasks that face the entire nation, like trade, currency, and defending our new country from outside threats. Experience has shown that a stronger national government is needed to deal with these problems. The Constitution provides adequate protections for the state governments to prevent their being destroyed by the national government.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shortly after the American Revolution was over, the United States of America was conceptualized, and from there emerged two possible forms of ruling. The government in the colonies set out to create the Articles of Confederation to prevent tyranny and be as traditional as possible. The Articles of Confederation gave the US government very little power over basic things such as taxation and raising an army. The Constitution was able to create a strong central government that united the country, and it is seen as a stepping stone to the eventual US Constitution since it wasn’t perfect.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people who supported the new Constitution, the Federalists, began to publish articles supporting ratification. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay eventually compiled 85 essays as The Federalist Papers. These supporters of the Constitution believed that the checks and balances system would allow a strong central government to preserve states' rights. They felt that the Articles of Confederation was too weak and that they were in need for a change (http://www.congressforkids.net/Constitution_ratifyingconstitution.htm). President George Washington wrote a letter to John Jay on August 1, 1786. In this letter Washington agrees with Jay’s criticism of the Articles of Confederation and says “we have errors to correct. We have probably had to good an opinion of human nature in forming our confederation…” The Articles of Confederation had “errors” that needed to be corrected. He complained that the thirteen “disunited states” could never agree. He also suggest that human nature being what it was, America needed a stronger, less democratic national government (doc.3).…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before the constitution we have today, there was something known as the Articles of Confederation, which was essentially an early version of the Constitution. When the Articles of Confederation were written, a group of American leaders thought that the newly-written articles didn't give the main federal government enough power and that too much power was being given to individuals and the state. They called themselves the federalists. To oppose them a new group formed called the Anti-Federalist. They felt that the articles should be changed, because the Original Articles wanted to give the central federal government a lot more power over the states, which caused the anti-Federalist to opposed.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States Constitution is a document that has assumed the work as the framework for the establishment of the United States Government. It is a veritable representation of coordinated effort and statesmanship based on numerical representation by the people. The document was written on parchment paper in the 18th century and was officially adopted on September 17, 1987 by the constitutional convention in Philadelphia, PA (contitution Net, 2010). It was ratified by representatives of the people in the name of “The people.” This document created the three branches of the government and gave those powers and responsibilities as well as established the individual powers allocated to each and a checks and balance system to ensure no branch became too powerful. The first…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    After formalizing the Declaration of Independence in 1776, the thirteen American colonies had to figure out who they were as a nation. Although they had claimed independence, now the Framers had to figure out the foundation of the government. However, the ruling body at this point was the Continental Congress and in 1777 this Congress took an important leap to unite the former colonies by blueprinting, The Articles of Confederation. The Founding Fathers decided there needed to be a centralized governing body in the center of the colonies, but it couldn’t be too influential because they were relinquishing away from a state that felt too powerful. Also, the Framers created a Confederation of States in which individuals would be representatives of the states.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation was drafted by John Dickinson in 1781 because there was a calling for a permanent government. The Articles made it possible for each state to have sovereignty and be self-governing. Congress was given some power but…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Over time, The Articles of Confederation were ineffective; leaving congress powerless over the United States and unable to control taxes. Not long after, delegates from practically all states met in 1787 to revise these Articles and instead came up with a new plan. This plan would implement desired changes from all delegates which became “The Constitution”.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The U.S. Constitution was the document put forth by the Continental Congress to set into motion the laws of the newly formed country. The basis of all our current laws the Constitution is ideas and ideals of the new country. It set forth the provisions to have a government and how the government should be formed and the restrictions imposed upon it. The newly elected Continental Congress met in Philadelphia and drafted the United States Constitution. Once they drafted a document that they could all agree on they sent it out to the states for ratification, the criteria for adoption of the Constitution was that nine of the thirteen states had to ratify the document. Finally in 1788 the ninth state New Jersey ratified the Constitution making it the law of the land.…

    • 2355 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Confederation Flaws

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After the United States declared independence from Great Britain in 1776, the thirteen states knew that they needed to create a document that stated their unity as one nation. In 1777, the Continental Congress wrote the Articles of Confederation, which became known as the first official government of the United States. While this new form of government had multiple achievements, it also had many failures, which eventually led to its replacement with the Constitution. The Articles of Confederation was a very influential document and greatly impacted the history of the United States.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays