Gillen suggested that writers should either agree with the data but with difference, or disagree with it and explain why. Gillen (2014) explained, “Concur with finding and then propose a mechanism that explains it” (p.213). He explained how a writer could agree with the data but at the same time jump into the conversation so he could put an opinion on it. When disagreeing with the data, Gillen (2014) suggested that a writer should explain why they disagree with it, and avoid getting to the conclusion with this
Gillen suggested that writers should either agree with the data but with difference, or disagree with it and explain why. Gillen (2014) explained, “Concur with finding and then propose a mechanism that explains it” (p.213). He explained how a writer could agree with the data but at the same time jump into the conversation so he could put an opinion on it. When disagreeing with the data, Gillen (2014) suggested that a writer should explain why they disagree with it, and avoid getting to the conclusion with this