Preview

Analysis Of Stanley Milgram's The Perils Of Obedience

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1792 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis Of Stanley Milgram's The Perils Of Obedience
For years there has been a debate on whether human beings are good or bad, there is no right or wrong answer to this. We have learned these two meanings through different reinforcements taught to us by our peers around us. People of different places and eras have conducted experiments and surveys trying to prove both sides. Some experiments have made the news and showed us just how mad people can become, others are now used to tap into our minds and get our attention. The way we as living individuals interact with one another raises these wonders of the question are humans good or bad. Human’s are neither of these two traits, we are people who learn these characteristics in different ways throughout our lifetime.
From birth we are raised in
…show more content…
In this experiment explores the idea that obedience is as basic an element in the structure of social life as one can point to. We as human beings are prone to obey, it is in our nature rooted from our ancestors; we obey to fit in and stay in the social trends. Milgram’s experiment was simple, it would test how much pain an ordinary citizen would inflict on another person simply because he was ordered to by an experimental scientist. Two people would come into a psychology lab and take part in a study of memory and learning, one was designated “teacher’ and the the other “learner.” The teacher would ask a few questions and if the learner failed to answer hey would receive a shock, show just how much pain the teacher would be causing they the same level of shock the student would …show more content…
In “Advertising's Fifteen Basic Appeals” by Jib Fowles, Fowles explains that we not only act in good and bad ways, but we react to things that affect us emotionally, sometimes even to those things locked away in our subconsciousness. We have fifteen basical appeals: the need for sex, the need for affiliation, the need to nurture, the need for guidance, the need to aggress, the need to achieve, the need to dominate, the need for prominence, the need for attention, the need for autonomy, the need to escape, the need to feel safe, the need for aesthetic sensations, The need to satisfy curiosity, and physiological needs: food, drink, sleep, etc. These basic appeals are highly exploited by the media, especially

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Stanley Milgram’s “The Perils of Obedience,” Stanley Milgram designed an experiment that would involve an experimenter, a teacher, and a learner to determine how far obedience would play a role on willing participants. The purpose of Milgram’s experiment is to see how far a willing participant would go based on orders to continue knowing that the orders would result in another person’s pain. The experiment was set up so that two willing participants went into the experiment understanding that they were taking part in a memory and learning exercise. One of the two willing participants played the role as the…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before Milgram could publish his first book about his obedience experiment it found its way onto many medias from the New York Times, Life, ABC television, and the British Press. As the experiment became more celebrated one question continued to come up ‘had Milgram mistreated his subjects?’ Some psychologists, including Alan Elms and Bruno Bettelheim, think so after some of Milgrams subjects talked about having heart attacks and others talked about joining group therapy after the experiment. Since those reports came about the experiment has been attacked by psychologists and many others. “In Milgrams defiance,” says Parker, “Milgram would always highlight the results of post-experimental studies which never showed any traumatic…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Replicating Milgram (The Open University, 2014), Milgram explains how he set up his obedience experiment. His aim was to get a volunteer, a ‘teacher’ to inflict increasing amounts of pain, through electric shocks, to another volunteer a ‘learner’ and to see when the ‘teacher’ would turn to the researcher, the ‘authority figure’ and ask to stop. Unknown to ‘the teacher’, the ‘learner’ and the ‘authority figure’ were aware of the real purpose of the experiment; the ‘teacher’ was told it was to study the effect of punishment on learning, and genuinely thought that they were inflicting pain on the ‘learner’ sat in another room. It was this deception and the emotional stress it generated to the ‘teacher’ that prompted the ethical issues debate…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Every human has a unique and complex thought processing system in which it is nearly impossible to determine how each person will react in a given situation. At an early age, people are taught to be obedient and oftentimes are forced to make a decision between being obedient or following their own morals. Usually, obedience wins because of the emphasis society has placed on it. Most of human’s actions are a result of a previous action in which they felt necessary to do. Both authors, Stanley Milgram of “The Perils of Obedience” and Ian Parker of “Obedience” agree that, humans, as a whole, will not respond the same in every similar situation because their actions are usually a result of obedience or of their current situation, rather than their personality.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nearly half a century after they were conducted, Milgram’s (1963, 1965, 1974) obedience studies remain among psychology’s most widely known and most often discussed experiments. Briefly, under the guise of a learning study, an experimenter instructed participants to administer increasingly powerful electric shocks to a ‘‘learner’’ when the learner made mistakes on a memory task. Although in reality no shocks were delivered, participants were instructed to start with a 15-volt shock for the learner’s first mistake and to increase the voltage in 15-volt increments for each successive mistake. In the basic procedure (Experiment 5), participants could hear the learner’s vocal protests and demands to be set free through the wall that separated…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    draft5 1

    • 1345 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “The Perils of Obedience” was an experiment done by Stanley Milgram concentrating on the conflict between obedience to the authority and individual’s self. Milgram created a threatening shock generator with starting level of 30 volts and expanding up to 450 volts. The experiment was set up with having an experimenter, a participant who was the subject, and a confederate pretending to be a volunteer. The teachers were told to ask questions from the learners and every time they gave a wrong answer, an electric shock was given and was increased 15 volt on each wrong answer. As the experiment advanced, the participants heard the learners argue to be discharged and complained about their heart condition.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate Milgram's Study

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Milgram did a lab experiment, varying different situational pressures to see which had the greatest effect on obedience. He told 40 male volunteers that it was a study of how punishment affects learning. After drawing lots, the real participant was assigned the role of 'teacher'. The learner was a confederate. The teachers job was to administrate a learning task and deliver 'electric shocks' to the learner (in another room) if he got a question wrong. The shocks began at 15 volts and increased in increment of 15 volts to a maximum of 450 volts.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past century, the field of Psychology has prospered, giving way to a more in depth knowledge and understanding of people’s social interactions with one another and what drives those connections. 20th century psychologist, Stanley Milgram, executed a series of Obedience to Authority test on random participants. As seen in the YouTube videos online and in class, Milgram’s study found that over 65% of the participants carried out the experiment, despite potentially hurting someone, due to the authority figure urging them to continue.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram’s findings, as read in the article “If Hitler Asked You to Electrocute a Stranger, Would You?”, apply to the first case of a manager and her fiancé ordering a teenage girl to strip and her following their commands. Milgram’s data suggested that humans are obedient even to the extent of blindly following authority. His findings were demonstrated by his experimental subjects who continued to increase the voltage to electrocute the learner, despite the subject’s moral code conflicting with the idea of…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is clearly shown when the difference in people's malicious behavior when shocking the students in the presence of authority and when given the freedom to choose the level of shock. The thesis of Milgram's essay was that obedience is a deeply ingrained behavior tendency; indeed, a potent impulse overriding reining ethics, sympathy and moral conduct is right on the dot. He also discusses the extreme willingness of man to obey authority at any length. This shows that "ordinary people, simply doing their jobs, and without any particular hostility on their part, can become agents in a terrible destructive process." This is proven by the fact that the majority of people were willing to shock students almost to the assumed point of death when instructed to do so by a…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Perils of Obedience, Stanley Milgram expresses his findings of an experiment he conducted trying to prove the lengths people will go to be obedient to authority.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chapter 16 Psychology

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages

    23. What is obedience? What was Stanley Milgram’s experiment? What are factors that affected the level of obedience in the individuals he studied?…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this film, Milgram was interested in researching how far people would go in obeying an instruction if it involved harming another person. It was shown that ordinary people tend to follow orders given by an authority figure, even to the extreme of killing an innocent human being. But, being obedient to individuals, especially with authority is carved into a human being from the way they were raised. If the person with authority is recognized to be morally right, people tend to obey orders from they even more.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Milgram Essay

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram conducted the Milgram experiment, study to see the participants' willingness to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts that differed with their conscience. The study is used to show the aim that Stanley Milgram himself placed to see the willingness of the participant to obey use pain if one of the participants got an answer wrong. Overall, 65% of the participants gave shocks up to 450 volts (obeyed) and 35% stopped sometime before 450 volts. During the study many participants showed signs of nervousness and tension. Participants sweated, trembled, stuttered, bit their lips, groaned, dug fingernails into their flesh, and these were typical not…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being Human

    • 666 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Is there a difference between being good and being human? Actually, there is a world of it. The difference lies in its Objectivity. Being good is deliberate, though most wouldn’t accept it, the so called ‘rationals’. Being human is more general, away from the judgmental prerogative, rather it keeps itself spared from those garlands…escapism may be, but I stand for it, why do we always have to be good, if we are good at times, what about the rest, we are invariably bad, could we not let go this chutzpas and be more simple, be the way we should be, without much laurels and unoscillating.…

    • 666 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays