Preview

Analysis Of Michael Bruce's 'Gentlemen, Your Argument'

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
294 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis Of Michael Bruce's 'Gentlemen, Your Argument'
In “Gentlemen, your verdict” by Michael Bruce, Lieutenant-Commander Oram should be convicted of murder for taking the lives of fifteen innocent men. Captain Oram was faced in a dilemma where he had to choose to either “condemn [his] whole crew to death or sacrifice fifteen and save five” (4).Choosing whether a person should die or live is a decision no one should make. In this case “a submarine [is] [laid] helpless[ly] at the bottom of the sea [with] ...twenty men-trapped”(1). The radio station reported that no ships were around and help would not come for a few days. Captain Oram made the decision to murder his crew with no hesitation, not to even analyzing his plan and find another solution. However, the oxygen tank could only last for two

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Horshoe Crab

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A.) The three seamen should be subject to penalties under English criminal law in terms of offering compensation to the boy’s parents in terms of remedies. The defendants’ actions were necessary due to the fact that they needed to eat in order to survive and defeat the deathly grip of the elements. In addition, the act of killing the boy was unethical, however if they did not assist in relieving the boy of death, the boy would have died anyway.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cornell W. Clayton argues that rather than addressing incivility, Americans should focus on the “substantive sources of political conflict”. This would change the entire tone of the conversation because there would be no incivility mentioned in his essay. Most of his essay is showing the reader about the incivilities that had happened in the past. Clayton informs the reader that incivility can be ended, and Americans should focus on causes of division today because it will effect the future. The tone of the conversation would be very different. It would be more positive than negative because there will be solutions for causes of divisions. He writes, “I dislike uncivil behavior, and I believe it says more about the louts who engage in it than…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe Stephen Feldman’s argument is very accurate. I think his arguments are eye opening, especially his arguments about religious holidays. Around Thanksgiving time there are a lot of Christmas decorations. For individuals in outgroups it would be difficult living in a world of cultural imperialism where everyone assumes you practice the same religion as them. I also agree with the author’s main argument, the separation of church and state does not equally protect all American’s religious freedoms. I realized this when the author mentioned the case of Thornton v. Caldor Inc. the main argument in the case was to allow employees to not work on their religious Sabbath, which ever day that might be. The Supreme Court approved the Christian…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Welcome to Facebook. The place where relationships are perfect, liars believe their own bull, and the world shows off they are living a great life. Where enemies are the ones that visit your profile the most, your friends and family block you, and even though you write what you are really thinking, there is always someone that takes it the wrong way.” It is not difficult to see controversy, also known as trolling, all at the swipe of a fingertip. As soon as a post has been posted onto a media website, without regard to the person, somebody will have an argument prepared to be served.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are times when people are put in the position in which they must choose between being selfless and helping others or not doing anything and only worrying about themselves. If the people choose to disregard their own safety and put another person’s life before theirs, it shows how ethically responsible they are. For an action to be ethically responsible, it must be done out of someone’s own intention to ensure the wellbeing of someone else. Ethical responsibility is defined as the obligation to do something that is morally sound in order to make sure a person is in good physical and emotional health. In the article titled, “Can the Law Make Us Be Decent?,” written by Jay Sterling Silver, the author states that there is not a federal…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Caird: An Analysis

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Have you ever thought about dying suddenly without thought? Or, have you ever wondered why people risk their lives doing something ludicrous just to satisfy their thrill seeking obsession? Not only are these folks endangering themselves, but they are risking the lives of the men and women that come to save them in these dangerous and complex situations. For example, if you decide to go hiking up a steep, treacherous trail in which mountain lions are known to be present, is it wise to choose that particular route? There are several other safe trails, yet you still select the more precarious option. Out of nowhere, a mountain lion viciously attacks. Should this person be held accountable for making an unwise decision knowing the risks beforehand?…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The officer condemns to death anyone brought to him on suspicion of breaking the law. He does not question the alleged, give him a chance to defend himself, nor does the officer search for evidence beyond one person’s claim. He simply believes that “Guilt is never to be doubted” (Kafka 145). This seems flawed to Western individuals who support a justice system that appreciates the value of human life. However, the officer seems to more greatly appreciate the value of human destruction. For instance, the officer exclaims on page 154, “How we all absorbed the look of transfiguration on the face of the sufferer, how we bathed our cheeks in the radiance of that justice, achieved at last and fading so quickly!” (Kafka). The officer is conveying a sense of captivation with the justice that is served at the suffering of the condemned. Human life is easily…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Human relationships always help us to carry on because they always presuppose further developments, a future - and also because we live as if our only task was precisely to have relationships with other people.” -Albert Camus…

    • 842 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gentlemen, Your Verdict

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this story Gentlemen your verdict, the captain of a submarine, L-C Oram, is put in a difficult situation which results in him sacrificing 14 of his men including himself, to save 5 men with families waiting for them back home. Of course killing people is wrong, but if I, or anyone else, was put into a situation like L-C Oram was, then I think it would be okay to…..as bad as that sounds. In situations like these, I think there are some exceptions to killing people. He wasn’t trying to murder his crew for fun, he had good intentions! He did it so that 5 men could go home to their families. He even sacrificed himself! He was being generous and thinking about the wives and children on those 5 men. L-C Oram had no choice! He was the captain, it was his duty to do the right thing….whatever that may be. He had no time to think, and there was no way he could save all the men in the submarine. He was even kind enough to make sure the crew died somewhat peacefully with the poison. But, this short story doesn’t make any sense at the end when the jury is asked “So gentlemen, guilty or not guilty?” Obviously he is guilty since he killed 14 other men and himself on top of that. I don’t see why he is on trial in the first place, he is dead! You can’t send a dead body to jail. Oram acted in the moment, anyone else would do the same thing. At least he saved the men that he did. In my opinion, he was a true captain. Everyone makes mistakes, even if this was a big one. I’m sure many others would agree with me that the only thing he is guilty of is being a true captain. A…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gentlemen of the jury, we have gathered to decide the fate of a boy, a life or death decision. This is a responsibility that must not be taken lightly, a guilty child born into a corrupt system shouldn’t be culled due to the ignorance and failure to achieve the justice he deserves. This boy, who is in good health, and should live to a good age, will come to a permanent end. In my many years of law it has never been clearer to me the suspect has been falsely accused. It is your duty as the jury, the established law that is supposed to keep the innocent out of jail, to decide the fate of an innocent man.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital punishment is something that has been debated over by the public for ages whether if it is impartial to take away another human’s life. For politicians it’s a way to extract dangerous criminals, but is it appropriate to take another human life due to a crime? “A Hanging” by George Orwell presents the perspective of a guard ordered to take a prisoner to the gallows for hanging as a result of an unknown crime. Throughout the essay Orwell uses symbolism of life and death to convey his animosity towards the capital punishment through the perspective of a guard in Burma during British Imperialism. “A Hanging” a hanging by George Orwell uses examples of life and death to assert Orwell’s distain towards capital punishment before the hanging of the prisoner, at the gallows, and after the hanging.…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hastily decided actions are another reason Captain Oram is unjustified in the deaths of fifteen men. The captain was a hasty decision maker. In the story he spent only a few minutes deciding the fate of these fifteen unknowing men. Captain Oram came up with his plan in the matter…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Exercises 10: This is essentially an argument. The author argues, “Love looks not with eyes but with mind.” However, Shakespeare primary argumentative claim is that true love is able to ignore superficial beauty and appreciate the genuine value of a person. Thus, he believes that Cupid, being the agent of love, is therefore blind to appearance. Cupid is often portrayed in art as wearing a blindfold, "painted blind". Yet, the following passage contains some argument and has been interpreted as argument. Therefore, the entire propositions preceding the first judgment and/ or claim of the passage serve as premises.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Michael Oakeshott was an Englishman born into the political turbulent era of 20th century, growing up exposed to a variety of political extremism in Europe, especially National Socialism and Marxism, along with two World Wars. As a result, he developed a dislike of radical political activism. This aversion is expressed in his work “On being Conservative,” where Oakeshott offers a unique political work that, instead of suggesting a prescriptive aid or explaining a political system, simply describes the conservative mindset. By doing so, he demystifies the conservative disposition during an era in which he believes is strongly anti-conservative in order to show its necessity in the world of politics.…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Elaine Pedreira Rabinovich of Sáo Paulo University spearheaded a social psychology study in an attempt to delve deeper into the earlier research conducted in the 1940’s by Dr. Eagleson. Her hypothesis suggested that the socioeconomic group of a child’s parent would affect the name chosen for that child (Rabinovich, 1993). The theory is an interesting one, yet it is faulty. The argument presented is inductive, albeit a weak and uncogent inductive argument. There are several key issues with this study. The evidence presented in support of the comparative claim to socioeconomic groups and children’s names is flawed, at best. A child’s name is not necessarily related to his or her parents’ socioeconomic group.…

    • 1581 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays