Preview

Chapter One: 1.4 Arguments and Explanations/ Page 24-26

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
959 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Chapter One: 1.4 Arguments and Explanations/ Page 24-26
Chapter One: 1.4 Arguments and Explanations/ Page 24-26
Exercises 10: This is essentially an argument. The author argues, “Love looks not with eyes but with mind.” However, Shakespeare primary argumentative claim is that true love is able to ignore superficial beauty and appreciate the genuine value of a person. Thus, he believes that Cupid, being the agent of love, is therefore blind to appearance. Cupid is often portrayed in art as wearing a blindfold, "painted blind". Yet, the following passage contains some argument and has been interpreted as argument. Therefore, the entire propositions preceding the first judgment and/ or claim of the passage serve as premises.
Exercises 11: This is an explanation passage; the author explains the responds of an article “Why Humans and Their Fur Parted Ways” that was posted in The New York Times. Yet, one might interpret this passage as an argument by passage premises is that the fact of “women have less body hare then man and how it is related to grater sexual selection pressure on woman.” Regardless to this interpretation, the intact of this proposition is above this passage is the premises.
Exercises 12: This is pretty clearly an argument passage; the argument is the fact of mad, mutual assured destruction is deterrent. The author argues that mad is commonly a self-confident damage and be supposed to a valuable within the discourage of nuclear attack during the cold war. Yet, he believes that Iran’s leaders do not give a damn as regards of murdering their own natives group in vast figures. The author’s argument is a justification in which the reason functions as evidence in support of the conclusion. Thus, the passage is a purpose of providing a rational basis for believing the conclusion to be true. Due to this interpretation, the propositions preceding the primary claim that is mutual assured destruction is deterrent.
Exercises 13: This is an explanation passage; what is being explained is the discover of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Devin McCall stated his brother’s name is Kevin McCall and he live in Laurenburg North Carolina.…

    • 113 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    4) For you, do the themes in the Overture to a Midsummer Night’s Dream represent the characters in the play? Why or why not?…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Part 2: Is it explicitly stated, or did you have to infer it? No, I did not have to read between the lines discover the claim of the essay. The author was clear about the claim she made.…

    • 536 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Essay 2 ENC 1102

    • 742 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The first story that came to mind when I started thinking about conflict was “Big Black Good Man”. At first, with the way the story starts, it seems like the protagonist is going to be Olaf and the antagonist is going to be Jim. The narrator paints Olaf out to be this nice, older man, who loves his wife and looks after his sailor tenants like they are his children. Then, in walks Jim. And Olaf’s first thought is “he was staring at the biggest, strangest, blackest man he’d ever seen in all his life.” Olaf was frightened and felt weak and puny compared to Jim. Jim proceeds to ask for a room for about five or six days. Once Olaf hands him a key to the room, he notices how large Jim’s hands are and that he could kill him with one blow. Olaf then shows him to his room and Jim says, “I wants a bottle of whiskey and a woman, can you fix me up?” Olaf says “yes”, he was used to doing that for his other tenants. He hesitates, but when he gets back to his office his calls up Lena to have her come over for Jim. When she arrived he made sure to tell her how big and black Jim was, Lena just said she could handle him. After that, for the entire time Jim stayed there he requested Lena every night. On the sixth night Jim comes in to Olaf’s office commands him to “stand up!” Olaf is paralyzed, he thinks Jim is about to attack him and maybe even kill him. Slowly, Olaf stands up and Jim circles his fingers around Olaf’s neck. Not closing, but massaging gently, moving back and forth. Then Jim starts to laugh and Olaf says, “Please don’t hurt me.” And in turn, still laughing, Jim says, “I wouldn’t hurt you, boy” and then leaves. Olaf falls to his chair and starts to cry, he thought believes Jim was mocking him and showing how easily he could kill him. After that he dreamed about revenge. A year later Jim is back, and Olaf thinks he has his chance at revenge at last. But, Olaf was wrong all along. The reason Jim had put his…

    • 742 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Chapter 16 Outline Part 1

    • 1763 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The federal government in 1865 faced unprecedented questions: how could the Union be restored and the defeated south reintegrate into the nation? Would the Confederate states be treated as conquered territories? Who would set the standards for readmission- Congress or the president? Most important what would happen to the 3.5 million former slaves?…

    • 1763 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Questions 6 through 12: Read the following passage then mark each fact according to its relevance to the passage. Be sure to offer your supporting logic.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Also, while in New Salem, Lincoln, met Ann Rutledge. “Ann was the young daughter of a tavern keeper where Abraham boarded occasionally (Gienapp, 2002. pp. 21). At the time that Abraham first met Ann she was engaged. Lincoln was always more sociable around women who were already involved with someone. “Ann was engaged to John McNeil when Abraham first took notice of her. Some time passed and McNeil admitted to Ann that his real last name was McNamar. After this confession John left for New York to take care of family business” (Gienapp, 2002. pp. 21). John left leaving the availability for Abraham to act upon his emotions. “Abraham and Ann became conditionally engaged in 1935. Unfortunately, Ann died suddenly in August 1835 before the couple…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As I was reading Susan Griffin’s essay I found the structure confusing to some extent. She talks about one thing, compares it with her life and then jumps to another story. In her essay Griffin brings up many topics; cells, rockets, world war two. In a way, reading through Griffin’s essay and understanding it is like solving a puzzle. One piece of the puzzle gives you nothing about the whole picture. Once the pieces are assembled, the picture becomes clear. Griffin, throughout examining others secrets and emotions, she comes to express her own secrets and emotions and know how she became the person she is today.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Donald L. Niewyk’s fifth and sixth chapters both deal more with outside perspectives and outside reactions than it does with those who were persecuted. The fifth chapter, “Bystander Reactions,” offers four different arguments as to why bystanders acted they way they did during the Holocaust. The sixth chapter, “Possibilities of Rescue,” discusses three different viewpoints on what foreign governments could have done to prevent the Holocaust. These two chapters conclude Niewyk’s book The Holocaust and wrap up the final sequence of events surrounding the Holocaust and the camps.…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Unit 064 1.1 Essay

    • 2978 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The actual Steiner ethos is to provide an unhurried and creative learning environment where children can find the joy in learning and experience the richness of childhood rather than early specialisation or academic hot-housing. Routines form a key part as does a blend of adult-directed and child-initiated play. Manufactured toys are not to be used as these are thought to inhibit children natural curiosity and imagination. Formal reading and writing does not begin until a child is 7 years old and there is emphasis on working according to children’s personalities. The approach works well for all children irrespective of academic ability, class, ethnicity or religion. It takes into account of the needs of the whole child – academic, physical, emotional and spiritual. It’s based on an understanding of the relevance of the different phases of child development. It’s supposed to develop a love of learning and enthusiasm for school. This approach is respected world wide for its ability to produce very able young people who have a strong sense of self and diverse capacities that enable them to become social and economically responsible…

    • 2978 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Directions: Complete the activity by reading each passage and answering the questions. Do not forget to spell check and proofread your work. Note: Clues will be provided after each question to guide you in your answers for Reading #1. Clues will not be provided in Reading #2.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reading Assignment 2

    • 680 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Mr. Vittorini and the other survivors of the earthquake do not feel that the fact that the scientists can not predict earthquakes is the reason science betrayed them. Vittorini says he feels betrayed because the scientists knew that they live in a earthquake area and did not inform the people of the town that the buildings are not structurally secure as well as the fact the the authorities told them it was fine to go back into their homes. A great section of the article includes Picuti and Vittorini’s accounts on the matter. “I’m not crazy,” Picuti says. “I know they can’t predict earthquakes. The basis of the charges is not that they didn’t predict the earthquake. As functionaries of the state, they had certain duties imposed by law: to evaluate and characterize the risks that were present in L’Aquila.” Part of that risk assessment, he says, should have included the density of the urban population and the known fragility of many ancient buildings in the city centre. “They were obligated to evaluate the degree of risk given all these factors,” he says, “and they did not.” “This isn’t a trial against science,” insists Vittorini, who is a civil party to the suit. But he says that a persistent message from authorities of “Be calm, don’t worry”, and a lack of specific advice, deprived him and others of an opportunity to make an informed decision about what to do on the night of the earthquake. “That’s why I feel betrayed by science,” he says. “Either they didn’t know certain things, which is a problem, or they didn’t know how to communicate what they did know, which is also a problem” (Macmillan 2011).…

    • 680 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HUM 111 CRITICAL THINKING

    • 554 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The two assumptions from Chapter ten I had to be aware of to ensure that it did not interfere with my critical analysis is the assumption that…

    • 554 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Love

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Assess your comprehension of stated main ideas. Complete the following two-column notes, set up as question-answers, with information from the chapter.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Examine Texts one, two, three and four carefully and then answer the questions on page 7.…

    • 2134 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays