Preview

Alexander The Great, Ashoka, And Wudi: A Comparative Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1257 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Alexander The Great, Ashoka, And Wudi: A Comparative Analysis
In ancient time, in order to expand their empires and accumulate properties, many successful emperors or leaders usually conquered other places through strong military forces. Someone then concludes that “the most successful ancient empires were able to maintain hegemony over conquered peoples with little or no thought to anything besides military power.” However, a successful emperor, such as Alexander the Great, Ashoka, and Han Wudi, did not gain the political control of the conquered regions through military force, but adopted more complicated and efficient methods such as controlling or eliciting peoples’s thoughts through education, making strict laws and assimilation—adapting cultures of conquered areas as well as diffusing its own culture …show more content…
In fact, Alexander the Great adapted a very unique strategy to control and convince conquered people-assimilation. A the same time the Hellenization went, Alexander also respected certain regional custom of conquered areas. Such intolerance of different cultures created a sense of belonging for conquered people, so they would satisfy with their current lives and maintained the hegemony. For instance, different from Ashoka, who interrelated to other religions, Alexander the Great actually was very open to different cultures since he hoped to mix Macedonians, Greeks and conquered people into one larger group. He wore Persian clothing, encouraged intermarriage(even his wife was a Persian princess), respecting religions of conquered people, and even punished Macedonians who mistreated native populations (Lecture 8). His intolerance to other cultures worked and conquered people had less ambitious to take against him. His achievement was proved and appreciated by Plutarch, a Greek writer. Plutarch recorded that Alexander “strove to acquire the goodwill of the conquered by showing respect for their apparel, so that they might continue constant in loving the Macedonians as rulers, and might not feel hate toward them as enemies” (Plutarch on Alexander and Hellenization, p111). Therefore, Alexander the Great successfully controlled conquered people and maintained the peace through assimilation until his death. It was true that powerful empires would expand their regions through military force. However, it did not mean that military force could solve every problem after conquering. In fact, Han dynasty, the Maurya dynasty and the kingdom of Macedon utilized education, laws and assimilation as other kinds of bloodless weapons, to protect their expand regions

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The classical empires experienced periods of great power by centralization of power and establishing belief systems to maintain power over their empire. This is true for both Han China and Mauryan India. Both of these classical empires were very successful in the ancient world because they were able to expand and create strong political policies to keep their empires strong and stable. While both Han China and Mauryan/Gupta India built distinct political structure to ensure that their officials were implementing their policies, Han China and Mauryan India used belief systems as techniques to ensure that there was order in their empires.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This is how Alexander’s Empire differed from the others, as he did not have enough people, he allowed the Persians to be part of the new Empire instead of disposing of them. Alexander was the clear example of rapprochement; he married Roxana, a Persian…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In both China during the Han dynasty and the Roman Republic/Empire, the way they absorbed conquered peoples into their society was a very savvy way of governing. When the Romans or Chinese had conquered an opposing nation, instead of taking over the towns and cities and disposing of their rulers, they allowed the conquered peoples to govern themselves as long as they stayed loyal and gave tribute to Rome or the Emperor respectively. For example, when the Romans had taken over Gaul (modern day…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 326 BCE, Alexander the Great conquered the Near East. After the conquest, Hellenism gradually spread in the area. It was the Alexander's intentional attempt to inculcate the Greek beliefs and culture in to minds of people throughout the world. According to the historians, Alexander the Great was the most arrogant king and warrior, who was in the view that Greek culture had the potential to influence any other culture in the world, and every nation could benefit from its universality.…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The forms of conquest and domination throughout the Middle East and Central Asia varied greatly throughout the centuries. The most successful empires were able to expand and exert their dominance through tactics that had not been utilized in previous empires. While the Umayyad and Safavid empires were powerful, the Ottoman and Mongol Empires became two of the strongest empires in the Middle East and Central Asia due to their inclusion of minorities, powerful tactics, and expansion through military force and trade.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, the Persian Emperor Paries lll, was brightly intelligent and his army outnumbered Alexander’s. By surprise Alexander denied the offer from Emperor to surrender all the Persian Empire west of Euphrates, and proceeded to invade the rest of Persia. Alexander mind was set on one thing only; that was to conquer the entire empire, which was just what he did. Persian grew a massive love for Alexander once the made the attempt to merge the Greek and Persian cultures, but they we’re both holding important positions. By doing so this caused him a lot of hardship once he begins to rule the former Persian Empire. Even though he adopted the Persians ways of governing; while keeping the Greek cultural ways. Alexander looked to create a new-found life with the empire, but not to exclude, but those in Greece started to resent him while the was away in Persia. The attention that Alexander showed the Persians, made those in Greece feel jealous a d the citizens began to…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexanders respect of other people's beliefs was one of the biggest reasons he is considered great. While other conquerors in this time period, like the persians, would try to destroy and get rid of other people's cultures Alexander would study and learn from them. He did this to such an extent in Egypt that they even referred to him as a god and pharaoh. In other places he would study their beliefs, and try to understand them as a people, and he may have been doing this to learn how to control them, but based on his character it is more likely that he did it so learn how to respect them.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander was able to do all of this at the young age of thirty-three years old. The Hellenistic Culture blended Greek Culture with Cultures that he saw while conquering new lands. Alexander made an effort to bring people from different cultures and places together. He did this many ways.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He had the courage and the will to do what no other king has done.His courage contributed greatly to his success hence the name, Alexander The Great. In the Background Essay, it claims that Alexander set off to conquer Persia almost right after he inherited the throne. Most people might think that he was stupid and that he was a madman to try and achieve that. But he did it, he took down the Persian army. Alexander The Great’s legacy spread Hellenization throughout the known world at the time. Hellenization is the spread of Greek culture and language, culture and population. It took a lot of courage and self esteem to be able to spread the Greek language among the conquered lands because he didn’t know if the people would hate it or not be he did it anyway. He could have faced rejection. At the end of it all, Alexander had courage like no other…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genghis Khan Thesis

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thesis: Genghis Khan's innovative style of warfare won him an empire twice as large as any other in history, measured through land size or population. The Mongols spread revolutionary ideas of culture and civilization throughout Asia, an empire t Ghengis a false version of history that as the author points out largely demonizes the Mongols.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    At only 32 years old, Alexander had created the largest empire the world had seen. He conquered land ranging from Greece to Egypt, and from Egypt to Asia and Persia. At just 20 years old, Alexander received the throne from Philip. Soon after, he began to build his empire. Alexander was very proud of his accomplishments, as one would expect. After defeating his close friend Dareius in battle, Alexander boasted, “What, pray? Dost thou not think that we are already victorious, now that we are relieved from wandering a vast and desolate country in pursuit of a Dareius who avoids battle?” (Plutarch…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The start of western culture came with the Greeks, and Alexander made it achieve global dominance by spreading it throughout the vast empire that he formed. He introduced the notion that the government should be for everyone, no just the wealthy. He is also considered to be a pioneer in urban planning and established around twenty cities, such as Alexandria, that became important trade centers and locations of many cultures. The local culture was further changed by Alexander's Greek-influenced city planning techniques, which established towns with a central market square, school, offices, shops, a public theater, and gym. It was changes such as these that led to the Hellenistic period of Greece after the death of Alexander, which is marked with increasing urbanization. His empire contained many cultures because he allowed the nations he conquered to practice any religion they wanted. He also incorporated some of the ideas of other nation into Greek culture making it stronger and…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World Empires

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Throughout human history we have seen the rise and fall of many great cities and empires, through archeological records and remains of cites. Mostly all of the empires that we have record has impacted and influence our world today. The most noticeable empires that have the greatest influence on today’s world are the early great empires of the Hittites and Assyrians and the later empires of the Romans and Chinese in the 2nd half of the first millennium. However both the early and later empires differ in how they got power and established themselves in the world. Some factors that contributed to the rise of the Roman and Chinese empires were the political structure and military conquest.…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Introduction (author 's name (professor /instructor (subject (date of submission ) Why the Spanish could conquer the Aztecs ? It was in 1519 when a band of Spanish conquistadors , led by Hernan Cortes arrived at the Yucatan Peninsula . Together with a small army of 600 men , Cortes sought out to conquer the Aztec empire for their country .…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Empires have been welcomed and glorified by people by being given empires laudatory names. They are seen as innocent without plans and reasons occasionally like the example of the United State invaded Iraq. Nevertheless, empires are not innocent, because rulers would like to plunder other lands and people by using them such as the British aggression of India and the Americans armed intervention against Iraq.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays