BUSINESS LAW - BBAL201 Term 3 2013 Business Law Assignment Name：Yue Xingchen Student No：S57975 Date：11/09/13 Executive Summary This report is going to analyse the Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic) and torts in Australia. The Wrong Act 1958(Vic) is one of the most important proposed law in Victoria‚ It has been amendment in 2002 and 2003. The aim of the wrong Act was to legislate for wrongs against a person‚ Torts is an
Premium Tort Negligence Tort law
on the student website to answer the following questions. Scenario: WIRETIME‚ Inc.‚ Advertisement Has WIRETIME‚ Inc.‚ committed any torts? If so‚ explain. Wiretime‚ Inc.’s ad in the well-known industry magazine stated that BUGusa‚ Inc. electronic recording devices are low quality and not reliable for more than a month (University of Phoenix‚ 2013). This tort is defamation since it can harm the company’s reputation. This written defamation‚ or libel‚ falls under the element of specificity because
Premium Tort Strict liability Negligence
Intro to Law In Class Assignment: Chapter 12 – Torts Answers in bold Questions: 1. Matt lost his Introduction to Law text‚ so he "borrowed" Sam’s copy without first asking Sam’s permission. After using it to study for the exam‚ he gave it back to Sam. This is an example of a. trespass to personal property or chattels. b. conversion. c. interference with a contractual relationship. d. false imprisonment. 2. The four basic elements in a negligence case are: a. duty‚ proximate
Premium Tort Tort law
LAW OF TORT LAW2002-N 20011/12 Lectures 3 and 4: Trespass to the Person Lectures 5 – 12: Negligence TRESPASS TO THE PERSON Reading: Steele Chap 2 to page 81; Street Chap 3; Winfield Chap 4. ASSAULT AND BATTERY Introduction Battery: intentional application of force to another person. Assault: act of the defendant which causes to the claimant reasonable apprehension of the infliction of an immediate battery on him by the defendant. Battery 1. The character
Premium Tort Tort law
Week Two Student Guide This week you are introduced to the concept of torts and the risk management process. This may help you identify how an organization can minimize the tort liability risk for a company. The readings analyze intentional torts and negligence with the intentional torts against persons‚ as well as examples of cases that address this issue. You study unintentional tort (negligence)‚ and you discuss the seminal case of Palsgraf v. The Long Island Railroad Company. The readings
Premium Tort
Contents Introduction Law plays important roles to protect benefits‚ obligations and bringing fair for everybody in society. This report gives information about tortuous liability‚ contractual liability‚ vicarious liability‚ the tort of negligence and defences. After that‚ I can determine liability of person who is responsible when violations as well as providing advices for the legal problems in business of VJSC. (3.1) Contrast liability in torts with contractual liability Tortuous
Premium Tort Tort law Duty of care
DEFINITIONS: In common law jurisdictions‚ tort is a civil wrong although in certain circumstances it is also treated as a criminal case e.g. in cases of assault. It is recognized legally as a basis for an action of a lawsuit. TORT: In common law jurisdictions‚ tort is a civil wrong although in certain circumstances it is also treated as a criminal case e.g. in cases of assault. It is recognized legally as a basis for an action of a lawsuit. Torts are considered under the law of obligations. Duties
Premium Law Tort Common law
Historical Background of Law of Tort: The modern law of torts has evolved through four main stages. In early stage when society was primitive private vengeance and self control were the only remedies available to the wronged person against the wrongdoer. He could get his wrong redressed with the help of his friends or relatives. The second stage of development of civil law was characterized by the state coming into existence when its functions were only persuasive in nature. It did not have enforcing
Free Common law Law Tort
September 16‚ 2006 Worksheet 1 EMPLOYMENT TORTS Employer’s Liability 1. Introduction The basis of the liability of an employer for negligence in respect of injury suffered by his employee during the course of the employee’s work is twofold: 1. He may be liable for breach of the personal duty of care which he owes to each employee; 2. He may be vicariously liable for breach by one employee of the duty of care which that employee owes to his fellow employees. The action against
Premium Employment Tort law Tort
Argument: Could the injuries be avoided or less serious if the plaintiff had worn a seatbelt? 5) Is the corporate defendant vicariously liable for the tort of the employee defendant? Law: The Law of Torts is a resolution to compensate any individual who have suffered any harm or wrongdoing. The tort of negligence is a broad area of law that “involves inadvertent or unintentional careless conduct causing injury or damage to another person or his property.” (Yates‚ Bereznicki-Korol & Clarke
Premium Tort Tort law