essay will discuss the history of asylum seekers coming to Australia’s shores and explore most recent guidelines in relation to the issues surrounding new arrivals of asylum seekers. It will also provide an overview on the attitudes towards asylum seekers within Australia as part of encouraging integration of people from different cultures. This paper also will intend to address the issues asylum seekers and refugees are facing in Australia. The policy on Asylum Seekers and Refugees remains one
Premium Refugee Human rights Australia
custody and filed an asylum application on his behalf against the wishes of his father‚ whom lived in Cuba. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) rejected the application as legally void causing the minor Plaintiff to appeal to the district court. The district court dismissed the case stating that the minor plaintiff’s father was the only one authorized to apply for his son’s asylum. The minor plaintiff argued that the law did not state the validity of the asylum application. The court
Premium Law United States Appeal
2001). There is evidence that refugees and asylum seekers may be disadvantaged in their access to these resources (Burchill‚ 2001). Eke‚ 2006 points out that thousands come the UK each year‚ having to adjust to a new life in foreign country and not knowing where to start. People’s interpersonal and language skills‚ and in particular their ability to articulate their health problem and conduct consultations‚ may mediate access to care (NCCSDO‚ 2001). Asylum seekers are often from very different cultures
Premium Health care Medicine Health
Jane’s Asylum Memorandum and Elian Gonzalez Case Brief Advanced Legal Writing Professor M. Hamilton Kaplan University September 1‚ 2009 Memorandum To: Attorney Justine Case CC: Professor Mindy Hamilton Date: 8/17/09 Re: Jane’s Asylum Case Question Presented Under the Immigration and Naturalization Service requirements for filing a petition for asylum in the U.S.‚ can a relative submit
Premium Human rights United States United States Constitution
filed asylum application on the minor’s behalf against the fathers wishes. This application was rejected by the Immigration and Naturalization Services as legally void. Plaintiff appealed to the District court‚ which was dismissed because the plaintiff’s father was the solely authorized to apply for the Plaintiffs asylum. Plaintiff appealed the dismissal as vocative of 1158 of the Immigration and Nationally Act of 1996 (INA)‚ 8 U.S.C.S. 1101 et seq. whether the Plaintiff minor applied for asylum within
Free United States Appeal Supreme Court of the United States
why the Australian government should be obliged to welcome asylum seekers who use illegal methods to come here. We have the responsibility to protect our borders and way of life against what could amount to a huge arrival of immigrants whose backgrounds and possible criminal status are unknown. Australia shouldn’t accept the refugees as they are over populating the country and if we do more and more will come. People believe that asylum seekers deserve a fair go just like everyone else‚ but why
Premium Australia Crime Refugee
persuasive‚ and refers to specific facts sufficient to demonstrate that the applicant is a refugee.” 8 U.S.C.A. § 1158(b)(1)(B)(ii) (West 2009). Analysis: I. Eligibility Anyone who is present in the United States‚ regardless of status‚ may apply for asylum. 8 U.S.C.A. § 1158(a)(1) (West 2009). However‚ eligibility is determined on the basis of refugee status. 8 U.S.C.A. § 1158(b)(1)(A) (West 2009). Refugee status is established by having a foreign nationality and either suffering previous persecution
Premium Family Mother Father
Paralegal RE: Jane Doe’s Asylum Case DATE: August 16‚ 2000 Questions Presented 1. Whether Jane‚ a minor‚ would be able to file a petition for asylum on her own behalf? 2. Whether Billy‚ the minors uncle and non-custodial adult‚ would be able to file a petition for asylum on behalf of Jane‚ if being a minor is an issue? 3. Whether Jane can use claims of physical abuse and being used as a governmental propaganda tool as grounds for filing a petition for asylum under United States law
Premium United States Law of the United States Parent
of his inspection and placed him in the care of his paternal great uncle‚ Lazaro Gonzalez‚ who resides in Miami‚ Florida. On January 19‚ 2000 Lazaro Gonzalez‚ plaintiff filed this lawsuit‚ alleging that the INS lacked the authority to reject the asylum applications and was required by federal statutes and regulations to accept and adjudicate those applications. Defendants urge this Court to dismiss the action or‚ alternatively‚ to grant summary judgment. Defendants attack the Complaint on various
Premium United States Constitution United States Supreme Court of the United States
------------------------------------------------- CC: Tony T. Smith Gonzalez v. Reno‚ 212 F.3d 1338 (11th Cir. 2000) Procedural History: Plaintiff‚ Elian Gonzalez‚ a six year old minor‚ through his “next of friend”‚ Lazaro Gonzalez‚ filed an asylum application with the INS (Immigration & Naturalization Service)‚ which was denied. The plaintiff’s then filed a claim in the federal district court which stated the Plaintiff’s due process rights were violated and the INS had overstepped their
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Supreme court