1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 John Quincy Jones c/o (street address) city‚ state‚ by [00000] Tele: 000-000-0000 John Quincy Jones‚ Appears as: Sui Juris (FILL IN NAME OF COURT HERE) THE STATE OF (NAME OF STATE)‚ Plaintiff‚ vs. JOHN QUINCY JONES‚ Aggrieved Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: (enter your case number here) WRIT OF PRAECIPE TO THE COURT CLERK Date: (? th) Day of (month)‚ 2005 (time of trial)‚ Traffic Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2. Therefore you are respectfully
Premium Civil procedure Plaintiff State
1 Commonwealth of Massachusetts 2 The Trail Court 3 Judgment of Divorce 4 Present: February 20‚ 2011 5 Hon. John Doe Justice 6 Patricia Bean‚ Plaintiff Vs. 7 David Bean‚ Defendant 8 This action was submitted to this court for consideration this 20th day of February‚ 2013. 9 The Defendant was served personally within the State of Massachusetts. 10 Plaintiff presented a verified complaint. 11 The Defendant has filed an answer or amended answer
Premium Plaintiff Pleading Complaint
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL‚ MALAYSIA v CHIOW THIAM GUAN [1983] 1 MLJ 51 FACT: An application made by the attorney general to have the plaintiff’s Statement of Claim struck out under 0.18 r. 19‚ Rules of High Court 1980 on the ground that the Statement of Claim disclosed no cause of action. The plaintiff sought for a declaration that the mandatory sentence of death under section 57(1) of the Internal Security Act was unconstitutional as being unreasonable‚ oppressive and infringing the equality provision
Premium Law Constitution Crime
1. What type of act used in reaching the Verdict of this case? Why? * The act that been used in this case are Act‚ 1967 under Section 20. This act was used to analyze the case of Teoh Chye Lyn dismissal order by All staff Outsourcing Sdn. Bhd. . 2. What are the factors which are lacking in this case upon reaching the judgment? * Well to be frank‚ there is no many lacking’s in this case. This case is very short‚ simple and easy to understand whereby we can clearly see that the claimant
Premium Critical thinking Judgment Lawsuit
Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila EN BANC G.R. No. L-6515 October 18‚ 1954 DAGUHOY ENTERPRISES‚ INC.‚ plaintiff-appellee‚ vs. RITA L. PONCE‚ with whom is joined her husband‚ DOMINGO PONCE‚ defendants-appellants. Marcelino Lontok and Marcelino Lontok‚ Jr. for appellants. Zavalla‚ Bautista and Nuevas for appellee. MONTEMAYOR‚ J.: The Daguhoy Enterprises‚ Inc.‚ a local corporation‚ with principal office in the City of Manila filed in the Court of First Instance
Premium Complaint Pleading Mortgage
CASE 1 of 5 Donnelly v. Rees 141 Cal. 56‚ Cal. 1903. November 6‚ 1903 FACTS: An action may be maintained by the sole heir of a deceased person to set aside a deed procured from the deceased without consideration by the fraudulent practices of the defendants and their undue influence over the deceased‚ who was known to be an habitual drunkard for more than five years before the execution of the deed‚ to anextent seriously to impair his mind‚ and who was so intoxicated at the time as to render him
Premium Plaintiff Complaint Judgment
IN THE COURT OF 1st CLASS CIVIL JUDGE‚ LAHORE The Aga Khan Hospital and Medical College Foundation VERSUS Mr. Bashir Ahmad WRITTEN STATEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT Respectfully Sheweth: Preliminary Objections 1. That the Plaintiff has not properly authorized Mr. Sherali Razwani S/O Ferozeali Razwani and Mrs. Shagufta Shamsuddin Hassan W/O Shamsuddin Sadruddin Hassan to file this suit. Hence‚ the Plaint is liable to be dismissed. 2. That the plaint is defective on the grounds
Premium Plaintiff Civil procedure Pleading
Within the court system‚ bias and prejudice exists. The courts take measures to try to prevent these biases and prejudices from affecting their proceedings and the outcomes of the cases. Even with the courts best prevention efforts many ethical issues arise. One area where many ethical issues are present is in jury selection and within the jury itself. The process of jury selection is called voir dire (Starr & McCormick‚ pg. 21). However‚ it is not as much of a selection process as it is an
Premium Jury Court Supreme Court of the United States
Procedural History The Plaintiff‚ Transamerica Oil Corporation‚ brought suit under the Kansas Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) to recover damages resulting from the breach of an express warranty by the defendant‚ Lynes‚ Inc. and Baker International Corporation. A jury in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas found in favor of the plaintiff and awarded Transamerica Oil Corporation $196‚577.62. The defendant appealed the court’s ruling December 21‚ 1983. Defendant claimed that
Premium Appeal Warranty Law
Everyone is at some point in time whether intentional or not guilty of judging someone or something before getting all the information needed to make an opinion instead of an assumption. Common errors in judgment affect our ability to creatively think‚ which I know I am guilty of a couple of judgment errors. (Bethel‚ 2013‚ pg. 4) Projection which is blaming your faults on others because everyone does it is something I am personally guilty of doing. (Bethel‚ 2013‚ pg.4) I remember in high school getting
Premium Judgment Error Blame