Business Law 110 Mr. Blackmun Case Study Problem #1 September 16‚ 2009 Case Study: Arbitration The issue pertaining to this case is whether a court can set aside an arbitration award on the basis that it violates public policy‚ subsequent to Mr. Edson being released from his job after being found intoxicated while on duty and being awarded reinstatement by the arbitrators. Exxon Mobile‚ the employer‚ filed a suit claiming that the award contravenes with public policy‚ which opposes intoxicated
Premium Law Appeal Civil procedure
ARCHER V. WARNER (01-1418) 538 U.S. 314 (2003) 283 F.3d 230‚ reversed and remanded. NATURE OF CASE Leonard and Arlene Warner sold the Warner Manufacturing Company to Elliott and Carol Archer. The Archers sued the Warners in North Carolina state court for fraud in connection to the sale. The settlement was that the Warners would pay the Archers $300‚000. The Warners paid $200‚000 and executed a promissory note for $100‚000. The Warners failed to make payments on the promissory note and the
Premium Appeal United States Jury
Plaintiff AmeriPride services‚ Inc (“Plaintiffs”) initiated action pursuant to CERCLA more than sixteen years ago to recover investigation and remediation costs of about $7.75 million it incurred after a perchloroethelyne (“PCE”) contamination caused by previous owners Valley Industrial Services‚ Inc. (“VIS”) an industrial dry cleaning and laundry business using PCE as a solvent. VIS would eventually merge into Texas Eastern Overseas‚ Inc (“TEO”). After trial‚ appeal‚ and settlement with other parties
Premium Law Civil procedure Legal terms
Chapter 3 – Jurisdiction State Court: Subject Matter Jurisdiction Personal Jurisdiction: Defendant voluntarily subject themselves by: Forum Selection Clause No challenge of lawsuit OR Defendant is a resident (can be sued at permanent place of residence/business) OR Defendant is served with process while in the state (plaintiff files complaint‚ defendant receives summons = process once received‚ clock starts ticking) OR Defendant did business‚ entered/breached a K or committed a tort in
Premium Jurisdiction Civil procedure Court
JONES VS HALL Legal Environment of Business Team G: Pablo Angell Amanda Hardin Brandon Weber BUSI 3303.03 Professor Leslie E. Lenn‚ JD TABLE OF CONTENTS 2. Executive Summary 3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Statement of the Problem Summary of the Issues Analysis and Solutions Recommended Action 1. Type of case: The type of cases leading up to this case are‚ in order of subject‚ Recording Communications Without Permission‚ Resisting Arrest‚ Violation/ Deprivation of Civil
Premium Law Appeal United States
I am writing to dispute/remove a billing error in the amount on the account 36224* with The Bank of the West. This account is not my account. The account 34224‚ the Bank of the West was opened by Mr. Craig L. Mezey on March 1st‚ 2006. Craig L. Mezey opened this account/loan for a purchase a Recreational Merchandise “2005 Sea Hunt 202.” The boat was registered on his (Craig L. Mezey) name. In October 24‚ 2007‚ the Circuit Court‚ Fifth Judicial Circuit in and Marion County‚ Florida ordered to Craig
Premium Civil procedure Plaintiff Lawsuit
Abstract In the case of White v. Gibbs‚ the plaintiff‚ Mrs. Debbie White‚ sued O’Malley’s Tavern alongside Patrick Gibbs. Gibbs served as bartender at the tavern during the night in question. Mrs. White seeks settlement under the state of Indiana’s Dram Shop Act. Under the Dram Shop Act‚ a bartender assumes liability to any persons injured who were served alcohol while exhibiting obvious signs of intoxication (Todd‚ 1986). Since the two parties reside in different states‚ the case was brought to
Premium Civil procedure Plaintiff United States
a) The acts of John and Lisa are despicable. The similarity in both of the acts is that they are using things that belong to me without my permission. Both are causing trouble in different ways and both are stealing something from me. John taking my car without my consent is unethical. Both of us staying being roommates doesn’t mean he can take anything that belongs to me without my permission. It is clear breach of my 1st Amendment rights. There are lot of risks because of his act. He is not only
Premium Privacy Plaintiff Aristotle
KTS FURNITURE CO.‚ LTD QUALITY MANAGEMNET PROCEDURE Subject CONTROL OF NONCONFORMING PRODUCT Document No. QP-QMR-04 Revision No. 00 Effective Date 2-06-2015 Copy No. 01 Prepared By QMR Date Reviewed By QMR Date Approved By MD Date KTS FURNITURE CO.‚ LTD Control of nonconforming product Document No. : QP-QMR-04 Revision No. : 00 Effective Date : 02-06-2015 Page : 1 Document
Premium Management File system Quality assurance
may be broken is if there is a child protection issue that requires me to pass on relevant information to safeguard a child from harm‚ which is my top priority. All parents must read and sign that they have read and understand my policies and procedure on how I run my setting. I will comply with the Data Protection Act on information sharing. If a child is identified as a child in need (section 17 of the Children Act 1989) I will‚ normally with the parent’s permission‚ give appropriate information
Premium Children Act 1989 Data Protection Act 1998 Divorce